You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
Do you think it was fake
Yes
53.15% (59 votes)
53.15% (59 votes)
No
46.85% (52 votes)
46.85% (52 votes)
Total Votes: 111
#41. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 12, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,506
Reputation Power: 101
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 12, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,506
Reputation Power: 101
Wow. This got me thinking. But the mythbusters busted part of that myth. The picture of Neil on the lander and hes all bright, well its because the moon is some what reflective. And white doesnt need much light to become bright. And theres one of two rocks and their shadows point in different directions. That was because one was on a hill and seemed to be pointing differently. But other than that this video pointed out some very interesting questions. Uhm, guess we'll never know
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#42. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 07, 201113Year Member
Posts: 878
Reputation Power: 35
Status: Offline
Joined: May 07, 201113Year Member
Posts: 878
Reputation Power: 35
Whoa. This is actually true! I wouldn't be smart enough to think this. :eh: :eh: :eh:
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#43. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 06, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,095
Reputation Power: 49
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 06, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,095
Reputation Power: 49
I think it's fake because the soviet space age was more advanced then the us. So they caught up by faking the moon landing
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#44. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 06, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,095
Reputation Power: 49
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 06, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,095
Reputation Power: 49
tpayne174 wrote Wow. This got me thinking. But the mythbusters busted part of that myth. The picture of Neil on the lander and hes all bright, well its because the moon is some what reflective. And white doesnt need much light to become bright. And theres one of two rocks and their shadows point in different directions. That was because one was on a hill and seemed to be pointing differently. But other than that this video pointed out some very interesting questions. Uhm, guess we'll never know.
Yes but myth busters is a paid program maybe threy could be paid to say that
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#45. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 06, 201014Year Member
Posts: 2,539
Reputation Power: 4
So we didnt land on the moon :O
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#46. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 01, 201014Year Member
Posts: 8,072
Reputation Power: 596
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 01, 201014Year Member
Posts: 8,072
Reputation Power: 596
#47. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 22, 201113Year Member
Posts: 13,704
Reputation Power: 14760
Motto: Quack
Motto: Quack
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 22, 201113Year Member
Posts: 13,704
Reputation Power: 14760
Motto: Quack
Nah I dont believe that. Neil Armstrong was the first...
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#48. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 20, 201113Year Member
Posts: 519
Reputation Power: 2
OMG there really ARE transformers on teh moon!
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#49. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 20, 201113Year Member
Posts: 519
Reputation Power: 2
We won't know the truth until they actually do their trip to the moon in 2018... IF they don't stage that one. They SHOULD know exactly what to expect on that trip but I have a feeling that they will run into surprises... Whether they publicize these surprises or not is what will be interesting.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#50. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 20, 201113Year Member
Posts: 519
Reputation Power: 2
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.