You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#11. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 16, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,331
Reputation Power: 49
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 16, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,331
Reputation Power: 49
Skull Candy-Designed for style/music,more popular
Beats-Designed for better sound quality/music producing,more expensive,had different features like bass boost,etc...
Beats-Designed for better sound quality/music producing,more expensive,had different features like bass boost,etc...
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#12. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 201113Year Member
Posts: 4,490
Reputation Power: 207
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 201113Year Member
Posts: 4,490
Reputation Power: 207
Beats by far. Skullcandy is the cheaper version.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#13. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 18, 201113Year Member
Posts: 16,419
Reputation Power: 24471
Status: Offline
Joined: May 18, 201113Year Member
Posts: 16,419
Reputation Power: 24471
YouAreMad wrote Skull Candy-Designed for style/music,more popular
Beats-Designed for better sound quality/music producing,more expensive,had different features like bass boost,etc...
I hope for their sake that nobody produces music using Beats. You need real headphones to do that.
Please post in my thread. You really need to.
Forums/viewtopic/p=15122729.html#15122729
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#14. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 18, 201113Year Member
Posts: 16,419
Reputation Power: 24471
Status: Offline
Joined: May 18, 201113Year Member
Posts: 16,419
Reputation Power: 24471
And I suspect the OP is ignoring me, and this entire topic, for that matter.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.