My head hurts after this post.

this is very interesting

Good try... but the big crunch theory has already been disproved.
The big crunch is when the metric expansion of space reverses and goes back into a singularity, but that singularity is what is at the middle of a black hole, it won't create a new big bang... also the universe expansion is not slowing down, it is accelerating... and there isn't enough mass in the universe for it to happen.
Also, this would need to happen in a closed universe - WMAP has shown the universe is flat, and for this theory the universe needs to be a special type of a spherical shape. And this would only happen in a closed universe, and the universe is open without boundaries, so it couldn't crunch.

Human wrote Good try... but the big crunch theory has already been disproved.
The big crunch is when the metric expansion of space reverses and goes back into a singularity, but that singularity is what is at the middle of a black hole, it won't create a new big bang... also the universe expansion is not slowing down, it is accelerating... and there isn't enough mass in the universe for it to happen.
Also, this would need to happen in a closed universe - WMAP has shown the universe is flat, and for this theory the universe needs to be a special type of a spherical shape. And this would only happen in a closed universe, and the universe is open without boundaries, so it couldn't crunch.

Actually blue shift proves, that some stella forms are approaching eachother and moving in, im not saying they all are it will probobally be billions of years or even trillions. and besides theirs no proof that if the big crunch happened, the reconnection of the universe could be one mass source of energy.

-Mark wrote I have never thought of it like this.

Mind boggling stuff just there

thanks man !!!

toook some time 20202020

Good post looks pretty cool

Coupon wrote Good post looks pretty cool

thanks man
20202020202020202

p3adrenaline wrote

Human wrote Good try... but the big crunch theory has already been disproved.
The big crunch is when the metric expansion of space reverses and goes back into a singularity, but that singularity is what is at the middle of a black hole, it won't create a new big bang... also the universe expansion is not slowing down, it is accelerating... and there isn't enough mass in the universe for it to happen.
Also, this would need to happen in a closed universe - WMAP has shown the universe is flat, and for this theory the universe needs to be a special type of a spherical shape. And this would only happen in a closed universe, and the universe is open without boundaries, so it couldn't crunch.

Actually blue shift proves, that some stella forms are approaching eachother and moving in, im not saying they all are it will probobally be billions of years or even trillions. and besides theirs no proof that if the big crunch happened, the reconnection of the universe could be one mass source of energy.

The Andromeda system is going to crash into the milky way in a few billion years... all galaxies move around.
And that's also ridiculous as anyway, if you are implying the universe is crunching in we have evidence it's moving out...

Ur theory might be correct but i still think that its a line
Thats why we use time lines and stuff but that migh be because its
Easier to use a line then an oval or a circle

My science teacher was talking about this in Class one day

and he said that "If everything stays the same, then wouldn't it all form the same. The Earth, the planets, and everything in the Universe, would form back EXACTLY the same way"

Blew my mind too