Nice post, this could actually be true.
I guess we'll all find out 1 day...
I hope life just doesn't end though.

funny how everyone just agrees, without any knowledge of how stuff works or reading posts against clearly showing the stupidity of this...

Human wrote funny how everyone just agrees, without any knowledge of how stuff works or reading posts against clearly showing the stupidity of this...

Actually this makes perfect sense instead of hating why dont you stop being so stubborn and closed minded about things instead of being a d1ck?

p3adrenaline wrote

Human wrote funny how everyone just agrees, without any knowledge of how stuff works or reading posts against clearly showing the stupidity of this...

Actually this makes perfect sense instead of hating why dont you stop being so stubborn and closed minded about things instead of being a ****?

You can't even tell the difference in brain death and clinical death mate... I know physics unlike you, where is your research from? Captain Underpants? Serious, if you can disprove the laws of physics and.... close minded people as you would say then you are right, but you are completely wrong in most of your entire argument!

Human wrote

p3adrenaline wrote

Human wrote funny how everyone just agrees, without any knowledge of how stuff works or reading posts against clearly showing the stupidity of this...

Actually this makes perfect sense instead of hating why dont you stop being so stubborn and closed minded about things instead of being a ****?

You can't even tell the difference in brain death and clinical death mate... I know physics unlike you, where is your research from? Captain Underpants? Serious, if you can disprove the laws of physics and.... close minded people as you would say then you are right, but you are completely wrong in most of your entire argument!

Haha you make me chuckle, i hope you know all of the arguments stated in my theories relating to physics dont go against anything, so unless you know all the worlds secrets you cant disprove my theory, because the exert of the amount of energy in beginning of time does not change cuz clearly maybe you didnt know that energy cant be created or destroyed, and with knowing that and implying that with the blue shift theory, you can prove since all energy is staying the same, then one mass source of energy could be regenerated with the same amount of density and energy as the first one therefore it will exert again and repeat the process, but sorry your right about everything

p3adrenaline wrote

Human wrote

p3adrenaline wrote

Human wrote funny how everyone just agrees, without any knowledge of how stuff works or reading posts against clearly showing the stupidity of this...

Actually this makes perfect sense instead of hating why dont you stop being so stubborn and closed minded about things instead of being a ****?

You can't even tell the difference in brain death and clinical death mate... I know physics unlike you, where is your research from? Captain Underpants? Serious, if you can disprove the laws of physics and.... close minded people as you would say then you are right, but you are completely wrong in most of your entire argument!

Haha you make me chuckle, i hope you know all of the arguments stated in my theories relating to physics dont go against anything, so unless you know all the worlds secrets you cant disprove my theory, because the exert of the amount of energy in beginning of time does not change cuz clearly maybe you didnt know that energy cant be created or destroyed, and with knowing that and implying that with the blue shift theory, you can prove since all energy is staying the same, then one mass source of energy could be regenerated with the same amount of density and energy as the first one therefore it will exert again and repeat the process, but sorry your right about everything

There is no 'blue shift theory' blue shift is blue shift for a start.
I never stated energy couldn't be created or destroyed. I said that's the mystery, no one knows so it's another theory, care to make another topic about it?
Your argument is pretty much the same as the first post. The big crunch is a disproved theory, it will NOT happen. The universe IS NOT CLOSED, so it cannot happen.
You think the big bang is an explosion, where are your sources? Your info is wrong and it is flawed.
"Inside this gigantic cauldron, stars would meld together, causing all of space to become hotter than the sun. Eventually, stars would explode and black holes would emerge, slowly at first and then more rapidly. As the end drew near, the black holes would suck up everything around them. Even they would coalesce at some point to form a monstrous black hole that would pull the universe closed like a drawstring bag. At the end, nothing would remain but a super-hot, super-dense singularity -- the seed of another universe. Many astronomers think the seed would germinate in a "big bounce," starting the whole process over again." You haven't even got the theory right for a start, it doesn't just suck itself in.
it's also been established that the gravitational pull of a heavenly body becomes weaker as you go further away from that particular body (of course...). Then, why would the universe expands at an ever accelerating pace, given that if it is expanding away from the original point of the Big Bang? Scientist can't prove that...

Human wrote

p3adrenaline wrote

Human wrote

p3adrenaline wrote

Human wrote funny how everyone just agrees, without any knowledge of how stuff works or reading posts against clearly showing the stupidity of this...

Actually this makes perfect sense instead of hating why dont you stop being so stubborn and closed minded about things instead of being a ****?

You can't even tell the difference in brain death and clinical death mate... I know physics unlike you, where is your research from? Captain Underpants? Serious, if you can disprove the laws of physics and.... close minded people as you would say then you are right, but you are completely wrong in most of your entire argument!

Haha you make me chuckle, i hope you know all of the arguments stated in my theories relating to physics dont go against anything, so unless you know all the worlds secrets you cant disprove my theory, because the exert of the amount of energy in beginning of time does not change cuz clearly maybe you didnt know that energy cant be created or destroyed, and with knowing that and implying that with the blue shift theory, you can prove since all energy is staying the same, then one mass source of energy could be regenerated with the same amount of density and energy as the first one therefore it will exert again and repeat the process, but sorry your right about everything

There is no 'blue shift theory' blue shift is blue shift for a start.
I never stated energy couldn't be created or destroyed. I said that's the mystery, no one knows so it's another theory, care to make another topic about it?
Your argument is pretty much the same as the first post. The big crunch is a disproved theory, it will NOT happen. The universe IS NOT CLOSED, so it cannot happen.
You think the big bang is an explosion, where are your sources? Your info is wrong and it is flawed.
"Inside this gigantic cauldron, stars would meld together, causing all of space to become hotter than the sun. Eventually, stars would explode and black holes would emerge, slowly at first and then more rapidly. As the end drew near, the black holes would suck up everything around them. Even they would coalesce at some point to form a monstrous black hole that would pull the universe closed like a drawstring bag. At the end, nothing would remain but a super-hot, super-dense singularity -- the seed of another universe. Many astronomers think the seed would germinate in a "big bounce," starting the whole process over again." You haven't even got the theory right for a start, it doesn't just suck itself in.
it's also been established that the gravitational pull of a heavenly body becomes weaker as you go further away from that particular body (of course...). Then, why would the universe expands at an ever accelerating pace, given that if it is expanding away from the original point of the Big Bang? Scientist can't prove that...

Do ya wanna cookie or something? its a theory? im not saying its real. its a possibility. And congratulations dude you officially know everything! Everything you say is 100% correct because you know everything so i bow down before you, you most intelligent being! your so smart dude. makin me jeal'n ;)

p3adrenaline wrote

Human wrote

p3adrenaline wrote

Human wrote

p3adrenaline wrote

Human wrote funny how everyone just agrees, without any knowledge of how stuff works or reading posts against clearly showing the stupidity of this...

Actually this makes perfect sense instead of hating why dont you stop being so stubborn and closed minded about things instead of being a ****?

You can't even tell the difference in brain death and clinical death mate... I know physics unlike you, where is your research from? Captain Underpants? Serious, if you can disprove the laws of physics and.... close minded people as you would say then you are right, but you are completely wrong in most of your entire argument!

Haha you make me chuckle, i hope you know all of the arguments stated in my theories relating to physics dont go against anything, so unless you know all the worlds secrets you cant disprove my theory, because the exert of the amount of energy in beginning of time does not change cuz clearly maybe you didnt know that energy cant be created or destroyed, and with knowing that and implying that with the blue shift theory, you can prove since all energy is staying the same, then one mass source of energy could be regenerated with the same amount of density and energy as the first one therefore it will exert again and repeat the process, but sorry your right about everything

There is no 'blue shift theory' blue shift is blue shift for a start.
I never stated energy couldn't be created or destroyed. I said that's the mystery, no one knows so it's another theory, care to make another topic about it?
Your argument is pretty much the same as the first post. The big crunch is a disproved theory, it will NOT happen. The universe IS NOT CLOSED, so it cannot happen.
You think the big bang is an explosion, where are your sources? Your info is wrong and it is flawed.
"Inside this gigantic cauldron, stars would meld together, causing all of space to become hotter than the sun. Eventually, stars would explode and black holes would emerge, slowly at first and then more rapidly. As the end drew near, the black holes would suck up everything around them. Even they would coalesce at some point to form a monstrous black hole that would pull the universe closed like a drawstring bag. At the end, nothing would remain but a super-hot, super-dense singularity -- the seed of another universe. Many astronomers think the seed would germinate in a "big bounce," starting the whole process over again." You haven't even got the theory right for a start, it doesn't just suck itself in.
it's also been established that the gravitational pull of a heavenly body becomes weaker as you go further away from that particular body (of course...). Then, why would the universe expands at an ever accelerating pace, given that if it is expanding away from the original point of the Big Bang? Scientist can't prove that...

Do ya wanna cookie or something? its a theory? im not saying its real. its a possibility. And congratulations dude you officially know everything! Everything you say is 100% correct because you know everything so i bow down before you, you most intelligent being! your so smart dude. makin me jeal'n ;)

Thanks bro, no problem!

Wow Ive never heard anything like this.

Great Post!

i support your theory