You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
My theory on particles being "semi-conscious."
Posted:

My theory on particles being "semi-conscious."Posted:

Vortensity
  • TTG Senior
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 12, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,320
Reputation Power: 69
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 12, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,320
Reputation Power: 69
Now, first of all, this video will help you understand my theory.



A single electron can go through both slits, at the same time.

But when you "observe" it only goes through one. I personally believe that particles are semi-conscious. Meaning it can make it's own decisions.

My theory, what do you think?
#2. Posted:
Human
  • TTG Undisputed
Status: Offline
Joined: May 01, 201014Year Member
Posts: 5,834
Reputation Power: 249
Status: Offline
Joined: May 01, 201014Year Member
Posts: 5,834
Reputation Power: 249
Oh my god that's just stupid.
Consciousness isn't even a physical thing for a start.
This is probably the most ridiculous thing I have EVER heard... it is dumb.
Our brain has a electromagnetic field 1.96 x 10 to the 9th power or so metres long... the massive brain waves affect the electron to make it act like a particle.
#3. Posted:
Vortensity
  • TTG Senior
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 12, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,320
Reputation Power: 69
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 12, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,320
Reputation Power: 69
Human wrote Oh my god that's just stupid.
Consciousness isn't even a physical thing for a start.
This is probably the most ridiculous thing I have EVER heard... it is dumb.
Our brain has a electromagnetic field 1.96 x 10 to the 9th power or so metres long... the massive brain waves affect the electron to make it act like a particle.


You could of put this in a better way tbf.

Not gonna have an argument with you about it, because you seem to know more about me.

Just a theory I made in like 30 seconds after a chat with a friend. Sorry if I insulted your intelligence.

Just to add, electron = sub-atomic particle.
#4. Posted:
Human
  • TTG Undisputed
Status: Offline
Joined: May 01, 201014Year Member
Posts: 5,834
Reputation Power: 249
Status: Offline
Joined: May 01, 201014Year Member
Posts: 5,834
Reputation Power: 249
Oh sorry if I offended you >.< there's been a lot of annoying posts recently and it's got me worked up... but there isn't any direct evidence for or against your theory so it must stay as a theory
#5. Posted:
Vortensity
  • TTG Senior
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 12, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,320
Reputation Power: 69
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 12, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,320
Reputation Power: 69
Human wrote Oh sorry if I offended you >.< there's been a lot of annoying posts recently and it's got me worked up... but there isn't any direct evidence for or against your theory so it must stay as a theory


Yeah i've been seeing all these stupid things on here, kind of annoyed me as well. But I honestly thought my theory was decent compared to others.

Mehh, oh well, and dw about it

Cheers for the feedback anyway.
Jump to:
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.