i got to agree with this there is alot more camping in the beta then bfbc2. i suppose you just have to want till all the cod noobs get the **** of it.

LOL i have gears 3 and i loved everything about it except the VS mode. People camping with Sawed off and gnasher. you should be used to cmaping playing gears lol.

But there is a lot of camping in battlefield. But its nothing like in COD.
in my opinion you actually have to camp. there is a lot o strategy that goes in winnning a game of rush. you need suppressive fire form snipers you ned your guys running up and causing diversions and you got guys like me. that run about 3/4 of the way to the objective and crawl through bushes clear out the objective plant the charges and defend the objective.

Defense is ALWAYS going to be camping. they need to defend. And it is a lot harder to defend than you think in this game. Every new location requires a new strategy. different positions different diversions. different ways of diluting their forces before they have a mass attack at an objective.

I dunno thats just my thoughts

Nickxmodz wrote The camping isn't half bad compared to the COD series.

I'm not hating on COD its just every time you turn around there is someone hiding in the corner.

I have to disagree i find way more campers in BF and with the addition of prone camping is going to be WAYYYYYYY worse than ant other BF

Its not a huge map Operation Metro so thats probably why people camp other maps will be good though

Theres Campers In real Life o_O
they try to make this game as real A Possible
and thats one Map
there probaly gonna be 10 more that are small, medium and big

If camping killed games then CoD would have died a long time ago.

CoD Camping: You cant beat them because they always use an unbeatable gun and spray at every single movement.
BF Camping: Big maps so not much of a problem, use teamwork to kill, chuck a grenade, use a vehicle, there are so many possibilities!