iTzREAPER wrote ouch i bet there really kicking there self for releasing a beta

I guarantee they loss wouldn't be as bad if they didn't put such a shitty map as the beta

I dont even think the beta is that bad.
But if it really is very different from
the actual game then they shouldnt have released it
there loosing money.

Battlefield had it coming,
The game pretty much sucks

Wow that sucks alot! This is why Call Of Duty never makes a beta

Orange_Juice wrote Wow that sucks alot! This is why Call Of Duty never makes a beta

Exactly, so they can release their shit game, and then you've already spent 60+ dollars on it and nothing you can do. Im glad battlefield 3 had a beta, and personally I LOVE IT ;)

It's their fault for having poor servers, and core Graphics.

They could of picked a better map, I would of liked to see Caspian Border.

-StunneR- wrote

Orange_Juice wrote Wow that sucks alot! This is why Call Of Duty never makes a beta

Exactly, so they can release their **** game, and then you've already spent 60+ dollars on it and nothing you can do. Im glad battlefield 3 had a beta, and personally I LOVE IT ;)

Lol not sure if :trollin: or just stupid.
If the COD games are shit, why does black ops on 360 have more players online then gears of war 3 which just came out almost 2 weeks ago? Why is MW2 the 3rd most played on live? Why would people play shit games?

COD doesnt need a beta, everyone that knows anything about how marketing works would know betas etheir break sales or increase sales. And the last two COD betas, increased them.

Why isn't this topic closed yet? You mods enjoyin the fanboy war? You ain't doing your job!

HaZeDSyNdroMe wrote Why isn't this topic closed yet? You mods enjoyin the fanboy war? You ain't doing your job!

We're having intellectual discussions.