You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
AMD's new FX chips tested!
Posted:
AMD's new FX chips tested!Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 06, 201014Year Member
Posts: 8,002
Reputation Power: 426
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 06, 201014Year Member
Posts: 8,002
Reputation Power: 426
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Aha.
Wow, where to start. AMD really messed up this time. A fast 8 core CPU that can't be maxed out. Loses to a lower wattage 2500k in gaming and single threaded applications. I knew it probably be bad, but this, really? This is a bad thing since Sandy Bridge is on top, and is going to be for a while..so that = less competition between the two = less production. I sort of feel sorry for the people who bought AM3+ just to put their 8150's in. I guess it's back to the blackboard now AMD?
Aha.
Wow, where to start. AMD really messed up this time. A fast 8 core CPU that can't be maxed out. Loses to a lower wattage 2500k in gaming and single threaded applications. I knew it probably be bad, but this, really? This is a bad thing since Sandy Bridge is on top, and is going to be for a while..so that = less competition between the two = less production. I sort of feel sorry for the people who bought AM3+ just to put their 8150's in. I guess it's back to the blackboard now AMD?
#2. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 30, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,160
Reputation Power: 59
i5 beats it lol wtf?
but how much faster are the 8 cores in multi-threaded applications?
~GTX
but how much faster are the 8 cores in multi-threaded applications?
~GTX
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#3. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 06, 201014Year Member
Posts: 8,002
Reputation Power: 426
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 06, 201014Year Member
Posts: 8,002
Reputation Power: 426
GTX wrote i5 beats it lol wtf?
but how much faster are the 8 cores in multi-threaded applications?
~GTX
It performs a bit better than the 1100t due to the higher core clocks, 8 cores, and higher level of cache. Either way, the CPU all around is a flop.
5 years in production and it loses to a older 2500k.
AMD is funny.
Either way, a OC'd 2500k > The highest AMD FX chip out.
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#4. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 14, 201014Year Member
Posts: 295
Reputation Power: 10
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 14, 201014Year Member
Posts: 295
Reputation Power: 10
I was gonna build an AMD bulldozer PC soon.. but after i had heard about the benchmarks and how short it falls compared the the 2500k. I might switch over to Intel.. and i hate to do that being an AMD fan.. Those chips took toooo long just to come short or break even with the sandy bridge chips. im dissapointed.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#5. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 20, 201014Year Member
Posts: 446
Reputation Power: 19
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 20, 201014Year Member
Posts: 446
Reputation Power: 19
#6. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 11, 201014Year Member
Posts: 2,637
Reputation Power: 134
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 11, 201014Year Member
Posts: 2,637
Reputation Power: 134
Holy Shit<33 This Is Sick!
- 0useful
- 3not useful
#7. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 18, 201113Year Member
Posts: 16,419
Reputation Power: 24469
Status: Offline
Joined: May 18, 201113Year Member
Posts: 16,419
Reputation Power: 24469
I was really looking forward to this, if not just to drive prices down. If anything, Bulldozer is better for servers and some special tasks. They tried, but came up with nothing special. Sandy Bridge is a real phenomenon and they have something great with it. BD just couldn't touch it. I wish it had been better, too! I'm all for competition, which means better tech and lower prices. 'Tis a bummer.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#8. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 06, 201014Year Member
Posts: 8,002
Reputation Power: 426
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 06, 201014Year Member
Posts: 8,002
Reputation Power: 426
KingSOLOMAN wrote I was gonna build an AMD bulldozer PC soon.. but after i had heard about the benchmarks and how short it falls compared the the 2500k. I might switch over to Intel.. and i hate to do that being an AMD fan.. Those chips took toooo long just to come short or break even with the sandy bridge chips. im dissapointed.
That's what I'm sort of thinking. It's like...why release a more expensive chip that loses to a higher performer, cheaper, lower wattage 2500k? I can see the prices falling for all 3 of the new FX chips.
r00t_b33r wrote I was really looking forward to this, if not just to drive prices down. If anything, Bulldozer is better for servers and some special tasks. They tried, but came up with nothing special. Sandy Bridge is a real phenomenon and they have something great with it. BD just couldn't touch it. I wish it had been better, too! I'm all for competition, which means better tech and lower prices. 'Tis a bummer.
I was looking forward to the newer chips as well ( even though I already have my SB build ). Rumors were going around saying it's going to go head-to-head with the more expensive 2600k....but now we know what really happens. Lol. Hell, maybe Intel will take this huge mistake by AMD and bring Sandy Bridge E / Ivy Bridge @ a wicked price with solid performance and just destroy AMD and their FX chips.
:biggrin:
- 3useful
- 0not useful
#9. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 18, 201113Year Member
Posts: 16,419
Reputation Power: 24469
Status: Offline
Joined: May 18, 201113Year Member
Posts: 16,419
Reputation Power: 24469
Generation wroteKingSOLOMAN wrote I was gonna build an AMD bulldozer PC soon.. but after i had heard about the benchmarks and how short it falls compared the the 2500k. I might switch over to Intel.. and i hate to do that being an AMD fan.. Those chips took toooo long just to come short or break even with the sandy bridge chips. im dissapointed.
That's what I'm sort of thinking. It's like...why release a more expensive chip that loses to a higher performer, cheaper, lower wattage 2500k? I can see the prices falling for all 3 of the new FX chips.
r00t_b33r wrote I was really looking forward to this, if not just to drive prices down. If anything, Bulldozer is better for servers and some special tasks. They tried, but came up with nothing special. Sandy Bridge is a real phenomenon and they have something great with it. BD just couldn't touch it. I wish it had been better, too! I'm all for competition, which means better tech and lower prices. 'Tis a bummer.
I was looking forward to the newer chips as well ( even though I already have my SB build ). Rumors were going around saying it's going to go head-to-head with the more expensive 2600k....but now we know what really happens. Lol. Hell, maybe Intel will take this huge mistake by AMD and bring Sandy Bridge E / Ivy Bridge @ a wicked price with solid performance and just destroy AMD and their FX chips.
:biggrin:
They better not. I want that competition to keep going. I'm also building in Q1 of 2012 waiting on the next generation of graphics cards and new CPUs from Intel. I love watching new stuff come out and I want my PC to use as many new parts as I can.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#10. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 30, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,160
Reputation Power: 59
Community wrote Holy ****<33 This Is Sick!
Holy Shit this guy didnt read the post!
~GTX
- 1useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.