TTG-H4CK wrote

BadCompany wrote

Jail wrote I'm not going to fight, but I agree, They copied BC2 and called it BF3. I know call of duty didnt make a new engine, but they do mix it up a bit more than Bf. This should be posted in Xbox General Discussion, all your going to get is Bf fanboys posting on it.

Battlefield 2
Battlefield 1943
Bad Company 2
Battlefield 3

Mhm Battlefield 2 2005 ,Bad Company 2 2009 , Battlefield 3 2011 ,Not really much of a copy .

Your name is Bad Company, biggest fanboy for any game on the entire site, and the friend is right the game sucks. Skyrim=Gameoftheyear

I love when kids like you post stuff like that, then i just laugh

Wow your friend must be a mw2 tryhard

TTG-H4CK wrote

BadCompany wrote

Jail wrote I'm not going to fight, but I agree, They copied BC2 and called it BF3. I know call of duty didnt make a new engine, but they do mix it up a bit more than Bf. This should be posted in Xbox General Discussion, all your going to get is Bf fanboys posting on it.

Battlefield 2
Battlefield 1943
Bad Company 2
Battlefield 3

Mhm Battlefield 2 2005 ,Bad Company 2 2009 , Battlefield 3 2011 ,Not really much of a copy .

Your name is Bad Company, biggest fanboy for any game on the entire site, and the friend is right the game sucks. Skyrim=Gameoftheyear

actually theres around 4 of us with Battlefield related usernames...and hes wrong he shouldnt have commented he started this argument, + yeah le's go slay some dragons, my runescape username is Dragon_Slayer_Elite_Dark-Lord0.53546.

You should not have made this post. Now its going to turn into an argument instead of " tell me your thoughts"

l_Emperor_l wrote My opinion is Call of Duty is way better.
CoD has just a pure amazing engine so their is no need for change. They changed what needed to be changed in MW3. For example they changed it so point streaks rather than killstreaks to prevent camping.

That made absolutely no sense... so you don't get points from kills if you camp? No matter what kids in CoD are going to camp.

Looks like he is not much of A friend and he must have horrible eyesight to say that BF3 graphics are bad.

Most of you kids on here won't have the attention span to read this, so just downvote and move on.
By the way most of yall talk, most of you guys are kids your self. Everyone against MW3 on the BF say everyone on COD is age 6-13, well most of you posters seem between the ages of 13-17, I don't know why you are trying to act as if you're more mature than the the average COD players.

The only reason BF doesn't have a reputation of kids is because BF2 was on PC, and people don't even have mics to talk on PC. Then in BFBC 2 and 1, everyone sits in party chat. While in COD you can talk to the opposing team between matches, so people switch out of party chat and start talking shit. On xbox i've played the following BF games; BF2 MC, BFBC 1/2, and their are just the same amount of pubescent kids talking.

And im not saying BF3 is bad, but graphics don't make a game. Its kind of like a girl.
Looks (graphics) attract you to the girl (game.) And her personality (gameplay) keeps you attracted. So don't think that just because MW3 didn't update the engine, its going to be some terrible game.

Oh, and inb4 im a COD fanboy. You'll see me in the MW3 forums defending BF3 from time to time, but it seems as if on the MW3 forums they are to occupied talking about MW3 to even mention BF3. While on the BF3 forums every post seems to have something about MW3. So im often defending it more. Just take a look at the trailers. Rarely on a MW3 video do I see the top comment refering to BF3, it happens but rarely. While on a BF3 video the top comment is always something about MW3.