You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#11. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 30, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,311
Reputation Power: 120
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 30, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,311
Reputation Power: 120
Also wrote Bad text placements, and never set your focal to any other blend mode than normal.My focal is my render and it is normal.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#12. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 30, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,341
Reputation Power: 102
Status: Offline
Joined: May 30, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,341
Reputation Power: 102
Rhymes wroteMinnesota_Nice wrote People here are nuts with their borders, I'd take it down a notch and make them maybe 2px if anything haha.Its not a border, there cinematic bars and the almost perfect.
If they were truly cinematic the tag would be in an aspect ratio of 2.35:1 or 1.85:1.
Don't get criticism then deny it and say it's perfect.
- 0useful
- 1not useful
#13. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 201113Year Member
Posts: 15,189
Reputation Power: 740
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 201113Year Member
Posts: 15,189
Reputation Power: 740
Wait, where is the smudging here. All i see is a bunch of red.
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#14. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 14, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,365
Reputation Power: 64
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 14, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,365
Reputation Power: 64
Its monotone, lq, and has bad text. You are getting better though, its a step up from your other smudges.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#15. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 30, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,311
Reputation Power: 120
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 30, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,311
Reputation Power: 120
Minnesota_Nice wroteRhymes wroteMinnesota_Nice wrote People here are nuts with their borders, I'd take it down a notch and make them maybe 2px if anything haha.Its not a border, there cinematic bars and the almost perfect.
If they were truly cinematic the tag would be in an aspect ratio of 2.35:1 or 1.85:1.
Don't get criticism then deny it and say it's perfect.
My apologies, I never looked into the specifics of it. I didn't think it was something that had to be exact I just thought you were sposed to eye ball it. I didn't think it was to much or to little.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#16. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 31, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,024
Reputation Power: 52
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 31, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,024
Reputation Power: 52
answer ur freaking AIM bro
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#17. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 12, 201113Year Member
Posts: 4,017
Reputation Power: 252
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 12, 201113Year Member
Posts: 4,017
Reputation Power: 252
blending is off. too many c4ds make sigs look bad. sorry but i just dont like this one.
you can do better/
you can do better/
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#18. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 15, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,747
Reputation Power: 101
Status: Offline
Joined: May 15, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,747
Reputation Power: 101
That is some amazing work. I see no flaws in it. 10/10
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#19. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 17, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,911
Reputation Power: 85
Rhymes wroteAlso wrote Bad text placements, and never set your focal to any other blend mode than normal.My focal is my render and it is normal.
I saw the fractal on the render wrong and thought it was the render that was a diff. blend mode.
Just place the text better.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.