You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
Should we get 10th lobby verifiers?
Yes.
86.49% (64 votes)
86.49% (64 votes)
No.
13.51% (10 votes)
13.51% (10 votes)
Total Votes: 74
#71. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 21, 200914Year Member
Posts: 1,467
Reputation Power: 59
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 21, 200914Year Member
Posts: 1,467
Reputation Power: 59
Espada1Tazz wrote They should have admins for verification.
-Tazz
Well their's not a lot of admins thats why they should have verifiers
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#72. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 18, 201014Year Member
Posts: 2,448
Reputation Power: 112
Status: Offline
Joined: May 18, 201014Year Member
Posts: 2,448
Reputation Power: 112
That is a good idea and yea i would want to verify the lobbies
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#73. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 01, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,768
Reputation Power: 66
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 01, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,768
Reputation Power: 66
its your own risk on who you are trusting, TTG even said they don't take any responsibility for your actions you take for yourself, don't blame them, blame your self... trust verified/stickied lobbys only.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#74. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 07, 201014Year Member
Posts: 2,529
Reputation Power: 113
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 07, 201014Year Member
Posts: 2,529
Reputation Power: 113
No, because that is what a sticky is, if there were 10th verifiers That would just be an excuse for them to get into a 10th lobby and slip in and out for infections, i would only let a moderator verify my lobby and i think that they deserve to be payed to do that. kind of a useless post because everyone that says yes prolly has no jtag. :arrow: :arrow: :arrow: :arrow: :arrow:
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#75. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 30, 201014Year Member
Posts: 3,669
Reputation Power: 238
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 30, 201014Year Member
Posts: 3,669
Reputation Power: 238
Yes, we should
I wouldn't mind being a verifier
I wouldn't mind being a verifier
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#76. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 07, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,140
Reputation Power: 51
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 07, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,140
Reputation Power: 51
what is this post even about?
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#77. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 05, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,042
Reputation Power: 40
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 05, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,042
Reputation Power: 40
Tons of people want to verify 1/3 are leeches
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#78. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 24, 200915Year Member
Posts: 11,066
Reputation Power: 1528
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 24, 200915Year Member
Posts: 11,066
Reputation Power: 1528
No.....10th lobbies are old.
I dun think anyone cares, except leachers...
I dun think anyone cares, except leachers...
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#79. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 25, 201014Year Member
Posts: 178
Reputation Power: 7
NickAnderson wrote The Staff Will have to Work 2x Harder,
Be On TTG Loads More.
And they Dont Need any more Staff members and they dont have anough staff to verify every single lobby,
Its 2ice as hard to do there job closing posts and other things while trying to verify lobbys all there time.
ik but it would make ttg a less scammer filled with website its worth it
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#80. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 03, 201014Year Member
Posts: 465
Reputation Power: 19
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 03, 201014Year Member
Posts: 465
Reputation Power: 19
I Think its a Great idea!
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.