White_Skyy wrote So Which One Do You Prefer? Personally I Think Bungie Is The Best Because They've Been Around Longer But On The Other Hand 343 Industries Looks Like There Going To Be Better.

Personally I love Bungie, but we can not judge 343 yet since none of their games are out yet. And by the way, Halo was originally 343's game. Bungie had a contract with 343, that's why the servers were transferred back to them because the contract time was up. Bungie rented their idea because they new they could do some big s*** with it, as you can see. Halo 4 may not be as good as the others, but once 343 warms up to everything, they will get greater just as Bungie did. I doubt it will take 2-3 games for 343 to get good based on how first-person shooter technology is changing.

lbreadstickl wrote

White_Skyy wrote So Which One Do You Prefer? Personally I Think Bungie Is The Best Because They've Been Around Longer But On The Other Hand 343 Industries Looks Like There Going To Be Better.

Personally I love Bungie, but we can not judge 343 yet since none of their games are out yet. And by the way, Halo was originally 343's game. Bungie had a contract with 343, that's why the servers were transferred back to them because the contract time was up. Bungie rented their idea because they new they could do some big s*** with it, as you can see. Halo 4 may not be as good as the others, but once 343 warms up to everything, they will get greater just as Bungie did. I doubt it will take 2-3 games for 343 to get good based on how first-person shooter technology is changing.

343 Did Help Make Halo: Reach..I don't know what part of Halo: Reach But They Did So You Can Judge Them Bye That..

Id have to say bungie, but I think 343 will do a good job with the halo series.

Suppression wrote Id have to say bungie, but I think 343 will do a good job with the halo series.

Yes, Honestly If 343 Fails Us Halo Fans We Will All Be Dissapointed And Me Myself Will Personally Sue Them For Making A Terrible Game xD

White_Skyy wrote

lbreadstickl wrote

White_Skyy wrote So Which One Do You Prefer? Personally I Think Bungie Is The Best Because They've Been Around Longer But On The Other Hand 343 Industries Looks Like There Going To Be Better.

Personally I love Bungie, but we can not judge 343 yet since none of their games are out yet. And by the way, Halo was originally 343's game. Bungie had a contract with 343, that's why the servers were transferred back to them because the contract time was up. Bungie rented their idea because they new they could do some big s*** with it, as you can see. Halo 4 may not be as good as the others, but once 343 warms up to everything, they will get greater just as Bungie did. I doubt it will take 2-3 games for 343 to get good based on how first-person shooter technology is changing.

343 Did Help Make Halo: Reach..I don't know what part of Halo: Reach But They Did So You Can Judge Them Bye That..

hahahahaha not really, you just said you didn't know which part they helped with. So if you judge any part of it, that could have been Bungie or 343's.

lbreadstickl wrote

White_Skyy wrote

lbreadstickl wrote

White_Skyy wrote So Which One Do You Prefer? Personally I Think Bungie Is The Best Because They've Been Around Longer But On The Other Hand 343 Industries Looks Like There Going To Be Better.

Personally I love Bungie, but we can not judge 343 yet since none of their games are out yet. And by the way, Halo was originally 343's game. Bungie had a contract with 343, that's why the servers were transferred back to them because the contract time was up. Bungie rented their idea because they new they could do some big s*** with it, as you can see. Halo 4 may not be as good as the others, but once 343 warms up to everything, they will get greater just as Bungie did. I doubt it will take 2-3 games for 343 to get good based on how first-person shooter technology is changing.

343 Did Help Make Halo: Reach..I don't know what part of Halo: Reach But They Did So You Can Judge Them Bye That..

hahahahaha not really, you just said you didn't know which part they helped with. So if you judge any part of it, that could have been Bungie or 343's.

It's Called Google!

lbreadstickl wrote

White_Skyy wrote So Which One Do You Prefer? Personally I Think Bungie Is The Best Because They've Been Around Longer But On The Other Hand 343 Industries Looks Like There Going To Be Better.

Personally I love Bungie, but we can not judge 343 yet since none of their games are out yet. And by the way, Halo was originally 343's game. Bungie had a contract with 343, that's why the servers were transferred back to them because the contract time was up. Bungie rented their idea because they new they could do some big s*** with it, as you can see. Halo 4 may not be as good as the others, but once 343 warms up to everything, they will get greater just as Bungie did. I doubt it will take 2-3 games for 343 to get good based on how first-person shooter technology is changing.

Which idiot told you that? Halo was thought up by Bungie, then in 1999, or 2000 Bungie signed a contract with Microsoft which brought Halo to the Xbox.. since it was originally going to be developed for Apple. In 2007 a couple weeks after Halo 3 was released, Bungie wanted to end the contract with Microsoft since they wanted to do their own things but they promised Microsoft that there were going to be two more Halo games that were going to be released. (Halo 3: ODST & Halo: Reach)

343 Industries was barley created in 2007..

So no, Bungie did not "rent" Halo...

P.S - 343i has only done the Defiant DLC (which IMO is better than the Noble DLC), TU, and Anniversary DLC.. and of course, Halo CEA..

Right now Im going with Bungie, Just because of what they have done for the series. But That might change after the realese of halo4

@Halo 4 So All That 343i Did Was A DLC Pack?

White_Skyy wrote @Halo 4 So All That 343i Did Was A DLC Pack?

Pretty much, yes. They did a title update for the game in November and added no bloom

Other than that, they just did the Anniversary & Defiant DLC..