You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
Fast Booting RGH2 Proof
Posted:
Fast Booting RGH2 ProofPosted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 18, 201212Year Member
Posts: 566
Reputation Power: 22
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 18, 201212Year Member
Posts: 566
Reputation Power: 22
Just Uploaded This, and i just realized i didnt show DoctorJ999 or anything, but you can see the Coolrunner.
#2. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 18, 201212Year Member
Posts: 566
Reputation Power: 22
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 18, 201212Year Member
Posts: 566
Reputation Power: 22
Just For you to Realize, I Turned it on at 59 Seconds into the Video, and it booted at 1:09
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#3. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 06, 201014Year Member
Posts: 2,699
Reputation Power: 153
if that is rgh2.0 then it does boot very fast for rgh2.0 but there is absolutely no proof that its rgh2.0 and not the original rgh
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#4. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 18, 201212Year Member
Posts: 566
Reputation Power: 22
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 18, 201212Year Member
Posts: 566
Reputation Power: 22
14179 Dashboard, ill redo the video, open up xexmenu, blah blah
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#5. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 19, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,206
Reputation Power: 10
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 19, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,206
Reputation Power: 10
lucky if mine boots at all it takes over 4 minutes
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#6. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 06, 201014Year Member
Posts: 2,699
Reputation Power: 153
DoctorJ999 wrote 14179 Dashboard, ill redo the video, open up xexmenu, blah blah
look, im not trying to flame you or start an argument all im saying is there is no proof this is rgh2.0 i believe that it is rghed but unless you show the wiring is for rgh2.0 and not original rgh then there is no way to prove its rgh2.0.....
i bring this up for one reason, you said you made it for someone to believe u that you have a quick booting rgh2.0 but without proof thats is actually 2.0 no one will believe so im just trying to help you in your quest to prove what you have set out to prove.
- 3useful
- 0not useful
#7. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 19, 201014Year Member
Posts: 5,070
Reputation Power: 216
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 19, 201014Year Member
Posts: 5,070
Reputation Power: 216
your sure you didnt write the nandump & not the nandflash.bin
very fast thats a very realistic boottime for being on 2.0
very fast thats a very realistic boottime for being on 2.0
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#8. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 18, 201212Year Member
Posts: 566
Reputation Power: 22
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 18, 201212Year Member
Posts: 566
Reputation Power: 22
With wires for dvdmeece
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#9. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 18, 201212Year Member
Posts: 566
Reputation Power: 22
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 18, 201212Year Member
Posts: 566
Reputation Power: 22
and mafia your still open to trading right
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#10. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 08, 201014Year Member
Posts: 2,310
Reputation Power: 10427
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 08, 201014Year Member
Posts: 2,310
Reputation Power: 10427
You were arguing that you had no problems with it. Obviously RGH2.0 is slower/more picky then 1.0. 1:00 isn't bad. But sure as hell isn't as good as instant.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.