You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#21. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 30, 201113Year Member
Posts: 890
Reputation Power: 75
Status: Offline
Joined: May 30, 201113Year Member
Posts: 890
Reputation Power: 75
I have a pair of solo HD's, I personally like them although they are way to over priced, You could spend 50 on headphones better than beats.
In beats you normally pay for the slick design and the name.
In beats you normally pay for the slick design and the name.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#22. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 20, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,573
Reputation Power: 67
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 20, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,573
Reputation Power: 67
I would but I can't afford it. You should get them.
- 0useful
- 2not useful
#23. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 13, 201113Year Member
Posts: 3,066
Reputation Power: 125
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 13, 201113Year Member
Posts: 3,066
Reputation Power: 125
r00t_b33r wroteIn the opening of the thread you are hostile towards Beats. People who actually like them will then disregard the thread because your opinions differ. Get the concept yet?Ishcabible wroteStain wroter00t_b33r wrote My topic is here for a reason, so we don't clog up this section with stupid Beats and headphones threads. Is this necessary? Can we discuss music now, please?Your thread is filled with bias people.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Biased against what exactly? It's not that we're poor people that can't afford Beats (jealousy), as the people that contribute to the thread (r00t_b33r, Parallel, and me) all have headphone collections worth at least three times as much as the Studios; and it's not an irrational hate against Monster--they're effectively helping to screw up the headphone industry by basically forcing the manufacturers we like to focus on bassy headphone to turn a profit.
Hah... Hahaha... Headphone collections? Over $300? About that...
- 0useful
- 1not useful
#24. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 20, 201212Year Member
Posts: 1,359
Reputation Power: 78
Why don't we just stick to my Beats thread? It has grown in size, plus I'm thinking about renaming it to Beats discussion. So that all the talk about Beats can remain in one thread instead of 100's of other threads.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#25. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 18, 201113Year Member
Posts: 16,419
Reputation Power: 24469
Status: Offline
Joined: May 18, 201113Year Member
Posts: 16,419
Reputation Power: 24469
Stain wroter00t_b33r wroteIn the opening of the thread you are hostile towards Beats. People who actually like them will then disregard the thread because your opinions differ. Get the concept yet?Ishcabible wroteStain wroter00t_b33r wrote My topic is here for a reason, so we don't clog up this section with stupid Beats and headphones threads. Is this necessary? Can we discuss music now, please?Your thread is filled with bias people.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Biased against what exactly? It's not that we're poor people that can't afford Beats (jealousy), as the people that contribute to the thread (r00t_b33r, Parallel, and me) all have headphone collections worth at least three times as much as the Studios; and it's not an irrational hate against Monster--they're effectively helping to screw up the headphone industry by basically forcing the manufacturers we like to focus on bassy headphone to turn a profit.
Hah... Hahaha... Headphone collections? Over $300? About that...
Finally back from being gone all day, sorry for the late response.
In my thread I tell people not to talk about Beats and the like because that's not what the thread is for. It's for people requesting headphone advice, not sharing their opinions on headphones that are completely ridiculous and quite frankly a waste of time. I wish I could spend more time discussing good headphones than getting so hung up on awful ones. If they're so closed minded they can't handle being wrong or acknowledging that they bought the wrong headphones, then it's their loss.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#26. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 16, 201113Year Member
Posts: 718
Reputation Power: 28
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 16, 201113Year Member
Posts: 718
Reputation Power: 28
Beats suck, end of story, r00t_beer knows what he's talking about.
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#27. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 29, 201014Year Member
Posts: 5,727
Reputation Power: 1271
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 29, 201014Year Member
Posts: 5,727
Reputation Power: 1271
If you want to pay for $20's worth of headphone and $380 for the brand name then sure. But beats are shiet quality, all tunnel sound.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#28. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 13, 201113Year Member
Posts: 3,066
Reputation Power: 125
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 13, 201113Year Member
Posts: 3,066
Reputation Power: 125
Ishcabible wroteYou don't catch on to quick do you? The thread is hostile towards Beats. You don't point out good qualities.Stain wroteStain wroteDon't get me wrong, I hate Beats but in your thread your hostile towards Beats and it only attracts other people who are hostile towards them.r00t_b33r wrote My topic is here for a reason, so we don't clog up this section with stupid Beats and headphones threads. Is this necessary? Can we discuss music now, please?Your thread is filled with bias people.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Biased against what exactly? It's not that we're poor people that can't afford Beats (jealousy), as the people that contribute to the thread (r00t_b33r, Parallel, and me) all have headphone collections worth at least three times as much as the Studios; and it's not an irrational hate against Monster--they're effectively helping to screw up the headphone industry by basically forcing the manufacturers we like to focus on bassy headphone to turn a profit.
That's not bias; that's sense.
And we're not hostile; we overemphasize points because that's what gets attention. Basically anti-advertising.
- 0useful
- 2not useful
#29. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 18, 201113Year Member
Posts: 16,419
Reputation Power: 24469
Status: Offline
Joined: May 18, 201113Year Member
Posts: 16,419
Reputation Power: 24469
Stain wroteIshcabible wroteYou don't catch on to quick do you? The thread is hostile towards Beats. You don't point out good qualities.Stain wroteStain wroteDon't get me wrong, I hate Beats but in your thread your hostile towards Beats and it only attracts other people who are hostile towards them.r00t_b33r wrote My topic is here for a reason, so we don't clog up this section with stupid Beats and headphones threads. Is this necessary? Can we discuss music now, please?Your thread is filled with bias people.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Biased against what exactly? It's not that we're poor people that can't afford Beats (jealousy), as the people that contribute to the thread (r00t_b33r, Parallel, and me) all have headphone collections worth at least three times as much as the Studios; and it's not an irrational hate against Monster--they're effectively helping to screw up the headphone industry by basically forcing the manufacturers we like to focus on bassy headphone to turn a profit.
That's not bias; that's sense.
And we're not hostile; we overemphasize points because that's what gets attention. Basically anti-advertising.
I give Beats credit where credit is due, but there's really nothing to credit them on. If anything, I can only say the advertising department a bang-up job polishing poop.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#30. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 13, 201113Year Member
Posts: 3,066
Reputation Power: 125
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 13, 201113Year Member
Posts: 3,066
Reputation Power: 125
r00t_b33r wroteYou are hostile towards Beats. Do you understand that, that keeps people who are looking into Beats away.Stain wroter00t_b33r wroteIn the opening of the thread you are hostile towards Beats. People who actually like them will then disregard the thread because your opinions differ. Get the concept yet?Ishcabible wroteStain wroter00t_b33r wrote My topic is here for a reason, so we don't clog up this section with stupid Beats and headphones threads. Is this necessary? Can we discuss music now, please?Your thread is filled with bias people.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Biased against what exactly? It's not that we're poor people that can't afford Beats (jealousy), as the people that contribute to the thread (r00t_b33r, Parallel, and me) all have headphone collections worth at least three times as much as the Studios; and it's not an irrational hate against Monster--they're effectively helping to screw up the headphone industry by basically forcing the manufacturers we like to focus on bassy headphone to turn a profit.
Hah... Hahaha... Headphone collections? Over $300? About that...
Finally back from being gone all day, sorry for the late response.
In my thread I tell people not to talk about Beats and the like because that's not what the thread is for. It's for people requesting headphone advice, not sharing their opinions on headphones that are completely ridiculous and quite frankly a waste of time. I wish I could spend more time discussing good headphones than getting so hung up on awful ones. If they're so closed minded they can't handle being wrong or acknowledging that they bought the wrong headphones, then it's their loss.
- 0useful
- 2not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.