You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
2D over 3D l I can't Decide l Read/Rate.
Posted:
2D over 3D l I can't Decide l Read/Rate.Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 05, 201212Year Member
Posts: 601
Reputation Power: 28
Status: Offline
Joined: May 05, 201212Year Member
Posts: 601
Reputation Power: 28
I've noticed recently as I make people YouTube Backgrounds that Include 3D text they get more subs even if they dont have videos ( AmuseCentral is a good example ). I tried sticking with 2D but I dont think I get as much attention... Im just wanting to know what you as the veiwers think.
3D Personal Background l Rate?
3D Personal Background l Speed Art
2D Personal Background l Rate?
Thanks for reading and letting me know what you think
3D Personal Background l Rate?
3D Personal Background l Speed Art
2D Personal Background l Rate?
Thanks for reading and letting me know what you think
Last edited by Triplicating ; edited 2 times in total
#2. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 19, 201212Year Member
Posts: 1,769
Reputation Power: 0
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 19, 201212Year Member
Posts: 1,769
Reputation Power: 0
i like the 2d one as it is unique and clean !! keep up the good work man
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#3. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 05, 200915Year Member
Posts: 12,208
Reputation Power: 885
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 05, 200915Year Member
Posts: 12,208
Reputation Power: 885
They both look very sexy but I always prefer 3-dimensional text for YouTube backgrounds. I would have to say my personal favourite is the first background.
Good job on both of them though, they are both nice.
Good job on both of them though, they are both nice.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#4. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 05, 201212Year Member
Posts: 601
Reputation Power: 28
Status: Offline
Joined: May 05, 201212Year Member
Posts: 601
Reputation Power: 28
-GFX wrote i like the 2d one as it is unique and clean !! keep up the good work man
Thanks, im just tying to get a veiwers point of view on the BGs
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#5. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 01, 201014Year Member
Posts: 10,792
Reputation Power: 550
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 01, 201014Year Member
Posts: 10,792
Reputation Power: 550
IMO, the 3D one looks more badas*
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#6. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 05, 201212Year Member
Posts: 601
Reputation Power: 28
Status: Offline
Joined: May 05, 201212Year Member
Posts: 601
Reputation Power: 28
Uzi wrote They both look very sexy but I always prefer 3-dimensional text for YouTube backgrounds. I would have to say my personal favourite is the first background.
Good job on both of them though, they are both nice.
Thanks Uzi, I guess ill stick with 3D till i get a partnership
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#7. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 02, 201113Year Member
Posts: 302
Reputation Power: 14
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 02, 201113Year Member
Posts: 302
Reputation Power: 14
3D- 8/10
2D- 9/10
sexy AF
-aP Zirka
2D- 9/10
sexy AF
-aP Zirka
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#8. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 22, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,849
Reputation Power: 88
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 22, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,849
Reputation Power: 88
IMO 2D > 3D . I think more graphic designers stick to 2D on their youtube backgrounds.(eg. Acrez, Rated, ChromeDesigns, etc.) In this case, 2nd background.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#9. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 05, 201212Year Member
Posts: 601
Reputation Power: 28
Status: Offline
Joined: May 05, 201212Year Member
Posts: 601
Reputation Power: 28
Aqulz wrote IMO 2D > 3D . I think more graphic designers stick to 2D on their youtube backgrounds.(eg. Acrez, Rated, ChromeDesigns, etc.) In this case, 2nd background.
Yea, thats why ive been sticking with 2D it just looke better and its cleaner, Thanks
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#10. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 12, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,403
Reputation Power: 60
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 12, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,403
Reputation Power: 60
Stick with the 2-D. More fresh & sleek. :sarcasm:
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.