You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.

Could you do it?

Yes
13.33% (2 votes)
It depends...
53.33% (8 votes)
Never
33.33% (5 votes)

Total Votes: 15

Could you do it?
Posted:

Could you do it?Posted:

Philosophy
  • Ladder Climber
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 30, 201212Year Member
Posts: 378
Reputation Power: 14
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 30, 201212Year Member
Posts: 378
Reputation Power: 14
In 1972 there was a plane crash in the Andes mountains, there were 45 people on board including a rugby team. More than a quarter of the passengers died in the crash. 29 were still alive but when an avalanche swept over their shelter, another 8 were killed.

Faced with starvation and radio news reports that the search for them had been abandoned, the survivors fed on the dead passengers who had been preserved in the snow.

16 Passengers were rescued after one of them walked to a village and informed authorities of the other survivors.

Could you have eaten friends and family to survive?

I know that I couldn't unless I was immensely desperate.
#2. Posted:
Zombr
  • Winter 2019
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 01, 201212Year Member
Posts: 3,831
Reputation Power: 169
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 01, 201212Year Member
Posts: 3,831
Reputation Power: 169
If i were desperate, Then yes i would. If they are dead already, I See no reason to eat them.
#3. Posted:
Dada_Life
  • TTG Natural
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 25, 201014Year Member
Posts: 961
Reputation Power: 49
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 25, 201014Year Member
Posts: 961
Reputation Power: 49
of course, heres a bigger moral dilemma that they made us debate upon at our school


its around the 1600's or so, there is a ship with a 4 man crew but their ship is sinking. They all hop into the life raft and start afloat. They had only enough food to last about a week. Once they had run out, they began to look for ways to decide who is to die first for cannablism. The crew could not figure out a fair way to pull on with this. The captain whispers to the first mate "what about the deck boy" who is over the edge of the raft, sick and throwing up from starvation and dehydration. They decide to kill the deck boy with a rusty knife they had, they killed him and ate him, then a couple days later a boat showed up. The crew had been saved. Now the captain and crew are set to court for a Moral Murder case. The captain pleas innocent for the sake of survival it must've been done. The court thinks otherwise. You're the judge. what is you're ruling?
#4. Posted:
Valkyrie210
  • Wise One
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 22, 201212Year Member
Posts: 533
Reputation Power: 22
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 22, 201212Year Member
Posts: 533
Reputation Power: 22
Umm it really depends. I am pretty sure they'd let me eat then so I could survive. I know i'd let them eat me if I was dead and they were alive.
#5. Posted:
Philosophy
  • Ladder Climber
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 30, 201212Year Member
Posts: 378
Reputation Power: 14
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 30, 201212Year Member
Posts: 378
Reputation Power: 14
TheGoblin wrote of course, heres a bigger moral dilemma that they made us debate upon at our school


its around the 1600's or so, there is a ship with a 4 man crew but their ship is sinking. They all hop into the life raft and start afloat. They had only enough food to last about a week. Once they had run out, they began to look for ways to decide who is to die first for cannablism. The crew could not figure out a fair way to pull on with this. The captain whispers to the first mate "what about the deck boy" who is over the edge of the raft, sick and throwing up from starvation and dehydration. They decide to kill the deck boy with a rusty knife they had, they killed him and ate him, then a couple days later a boat showed up. The crew had been saved. Now the captain and crew are set to court for a Moral Murder case. The captain pleas innocent for the sake of survival it must've been done. The court thinks otherwise. You're the judge. what is you're ruling?


Not guilty.

For all they knew the boy could have died at any time.
#6. Posted:
mrgrowl
  • TTG Fanatic
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 09, 200915Year Member
Posts: 4,050
Reputation Power: 186
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 09, 200915Year Member
Posts: 4,050
Reputation Power: 186
Damn there was a movie based off of this event, but I can;t remember it for the life of me! It was a very good movie, but I feel asleep half way through. Can anyone enlighten me?

Oh, and yes.
#7. Posted:
Marvellous
  • New Member
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 12, 201212Year Member
Posts: 47
Reputation Power: 1
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 12, 201212Year Member
Posts: 47
Reputation Power: 1
I Think i would eat them .
But only of i was about to die and there was Nothing at all left to eat.
#8. Posted:
galaxyblast
  • TTG Senior
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 19, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,557
Reputation Power: 61
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 19, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,557
Reputation Power: 61
There are certain things in life i would NEVER do, under any circumstance. This is one of those things.
#9. Posted:
Flipped
  • Junior Member
Status: Offline
Joined: May 03, 201212Year Member
Posts: 96
Reputation Power: 5
Status: Offline
Joined: May 03, 201212Year Member
Posts: 96
Reputation Power: 5
TheGoblin wrote of course, heres a bigger moral dilemma that they made us debate upon at our school


its around the 1600's or so, there is a ship with a 4 man crew but their ship is sinking. They all hop into the life raft and start afloat. They had only enough food to last about a week. Once they had run out, they began to look for ways to decide who is to die first for cannablism. The crew could not figure out a fair way to pull on with this. The captain whispers to the first mate "what about the deck boy" who is over the edge of the raft, sick and throwing up from starvation and dehydration. They decide to kill the deck boy with a rusty knife they had, they killed him and ate him, then a couple days later a boat showed up. The crew had been saved. Now the captain and crew are set to court for a Moral Murder case. The captain pleas innocent for the sake of survival it must've been done. The court thinks otherwise. You're the judge. what is you're ruling?


Not Guilty. for all they know is that the they could of died.
#10. Posted:
Yin
  • TTG Undisputed
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 30, 201212Year Member
Posts: 5,468
Reputation Power: 245
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 30, 201212Year Member
Posts: 5,468
Reputation Power: 245
TheGoblin wrote of course, heres a bigger moral dilemma that they made us debate upon at our school


its around the 1600's or so, there is a ship with a 4 man crew but their ship is sinking. They all hop into the life raft and start afloat. They had only enough food to last about a week. Once they had run out, they began to look for ways to decide who is to die first for cannablism. The crew could not figure out a fair way to pull on with this. The captain whispers to the first mate "what about the deck boy" who is over the edge of the raft, sick and throwing up from starvation and dehydration. They decide to kill the deck boy with a rusty knife they had, they killed him and ate him, then a couple days later a boat showed up. The crew had been saved. Now the captain and crew are set to court for a Moral Murder case. The captain pleas innocent for the sake of survival it must've been done. The court thinks otherwise. You're the judge. what is you're ruling?

I can see where it would be not guilty, though I feel the captain should have sacrificed himself for his crew.

On topic: I wouldn't be able to do it. As much I would probably want to at the time, I couldn't.
Jump to:
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.