Well, time isn't man made. Man measures time with numbers. Time itself is just the motion of the universe. Time is real, but humans may not be able to manipulate it. Though I think it may be possible to travel to other universes that are in different time periods (assuming the theory of multiverses is true.) We could then see the past without it changing our own, though it would be messed up changing someone elses. We will never truely know until scientists either prove or disprove something.

You opinion is well respected, I will take in consideration on my next research.

First off, Einstein himself thought time travel could be possible. Ever heard of the little equation E=MC squared. Yeah that equation leaves open the possibility of time travel. And second, time is not man made. It is woven into the fabric of space. Also known as space-time. Every scientist in the world knows that time exists. So I don't know where you are getting your information but you should probably study a little harder in science cause right now, you are failing :facepalm:

KAmiKaZiGRuNT wrote First off, Einstein himself thought time travel could be possible. Ever heard of the little equation E=MC squared. Yeah that equation leaves open the possibility of time travel. And second, time is not man made. It is woven into the fabric of space. Also known as space-time. Every scientist in the world knows that time exists. So I don't know where you are getting your information but you should probably study a little harder in science cause right now, you are failing :facepalm:

wow you guys should get working on a time machine you might even get a sticky

SnDCaution wrote

KAmiKaZiGRuNT wrote First off, Einstein himself thought time travel could be possible. Ever heard of the little equation E=MC squared. Yeah that equation leaves open the possibility of time travel. And second, time is not man made. It is woven into the fabric of space. Also known as space-time. Every scientist in the world knows that time exists. So I don't know where you are getting your information but you should probably study a little harder in science cause right now, you are failing :facepalm:

wow you guys should get working on a time machine you might even get a sticky

If they made a working time machine, they would probably revive a Nobel prize rather than a sticky.

I'm not sure how you got time machine out of what he just said either.

KAmiKaZiGRuNT wrote First off, Einstein himself thought time travel could be possible. Ever heard of the little equation E=MC squared. Yeah that equation leaves open the possibility of time travel. And second, time is not man made. It is woven into the fabric of space. Also known as space-time. Every scientist in the world knows that time exists. So I don't know where you are getting your information but you should probably study a little harder in science cause right now, you are failing :facepalm:

ok just read this instead of being a dickhead: For one, our idea of time doesn't run the clocks that "give" us the "time"! Is that not puzzling? In reality, metal springs or batteries and not time activate clocks.
Ask yourself this question: "Why do I believe a clock gives me the time whereas time doesn't run that clock? Time is clearly missing from that specific reality that is a clock!
Then time is neither controlling the time duration of our life that is at the mercy of an accident, nor our aging, which runs on biological processes such as the physical duplication of cells.
Obviously time is not involved in our so-called aging process! Now choose any word, within our human language that implies time, you will find out that time is never involved! Even simultaneity and instantaneity must occur elsewhere than in time as both involve no time!
Besides there has to be a reason or some doubt, for which so many, including you and I, do ask the question:does time exist?

Here is an answer:
There is no physical interaction whatsoever between our concept of time and any physical phenomenon.
As a consequence we cannot perceive physically our concept of time.
And as a consequence again we are unable to describe the alleged entity time.
Time fails both aspects of the double condition that could establish it's physical entity.
And that is true in the science of physics too! Richard Feynman, a renown physicist, suggested that "time runs independently of everything else."
Not connected to anything real, "time" is only a word of our language and "t" only a mathematical symbol in physics.
Time is non physical. Time does not exist in reality!"

Ok I get what you are trying to say but I think you are overthinking it. Neither of us are experts in this subject so I am just going to leave this alone. I am going to say that time does exist. The thing that we think of as "time" is very real". Their are many example's, even within your reply. It does exist so just trust the worlds scientists because I think they know a little bit more on the subject than we do. Sorry if my last post was insulting.

KAmiKaZiGRuNT wrote First off, Einstein himself thought time travel could be possible. E=MC squared.

That equation is wrong, the whole basis of that was saying that the speed of light can not be broken.

There are particles that have been found to be faster than light, therefore E does not equal MC squared.

drgnmeister wrote

KAmiKaZiGRuNT wrote First off, Einstein himself thought time travel could be possible. E=MC squared.

That equation is wrong, the whole basis of that was saying that the speed of light can not be broken.

There are particles that have been found to be faster than light, therefore E does not equal MC squared.

I thought E=MC2 Meant that Energy was equal to matter...? :S