I agree that the shot guns are way to extreme. The KSG-12 can kill across map with no problem, etc. Everything else seems perfect to me. The guns are the way they are, because they are "Futuristic" guns. Hint Hint: The game is taken place in 2025 maybe? But, oh well. People normally say a game sucks, because they are horrible at the game. I know you will come back with saying "My K/D is like 1.50, so I do not suck" but then again, you are complaining.

I got bored of it after a week.

Its called Battlefield or any other shooting sim. Not FPS!!!

Clover- wrote I agree that the shot guns are way to extreme. The KSG-12 can kill across map with no problem, etc. Everything else seems perfect to me. The guns are the way they are, because they are "Futuristic" guns. Hint Hint: The game is taken place in 2025 maybe? But, oh well. People normally say a game sucks, because they are horrible at the game. I know you will come back with saying "My K/D is like 1.50, so I do not suck" but then again, you are complaining.

I'm not saying I'm amazing at the game because quite frankly I'm not. I'm just implying that I'm not god awful. But if you think about it and an Assault Rifle should kill faster than a pistol. And it doesn't.

Purist_Co-Leader wrote

OmittingCoder wrote I don't understand why this is happening. Ever Call of Duty game after Black Ops 1 was horrible. MW3 is way too easy and boring as ****. Black Ops 2 doesn't make any freakin' sense. The weapons are ****. Pistols are better than Assault Rifles. Shotguns are insane. Only high fire rate guns are good. The damage system is stupid in BO2. Why do they make it this way?

How about you just suck so you **** about it. no cares if you dont like it stop playing whats 1 person compared to 600k on everyday. you being on means nothing bye.

lol you sound very mad, i bet you dont even have over a one kd. also the lad compensation is terrible. i get killed when i see the kid in prone but on his screen he is behind me,

OmittingCoder wrote

Clover- wrote I agree that the shot guns are way to extreme. The KSG-12 can kill across map with no problem, etc. Everything else seems perfect to me. The guns are the way they are, because they are "Futuristic" guns. Hint Hint: The game is taken place in 2025 maybe? But, oh well. People normally say a game sucks, because they are horrible at the game. I know you will come back with saying "My K/D is like 1.50, so I do not suck" but then again, you are complaining.

I'm not saying I'm amazing at the game because quite frankly I'm not. I'm just implying that I'm not god awful. But if you think about it and an Assault Rifle should kill faster than a pistol. And it doesn't.

I understand where you are getting at, but think about this situation.

You are standing 4 feet from someone. You have an Assault Rifle, and he has a Pistol. And at the same time, you guys start to shoot. Who will win? Someone with a heavy assault rifle? Or someone with a light pistol who can pull the trigger faster due to the lightness of it?

OmittingCoder wrote I don't understand why this is happening. Ever Call of Duty game after Black Ops 1 was horrible. MW3 is way too easy and boring as ****. Black Ops 2 doesn't make any freakin' sense. The weapons are ****. Pistols are better than Assault Rifles. Shotguns are insane. Only high fire rate guns are good. The damage system is stupid in BO2. Why do they make it this way?

This isn't facebook or twitter or any other social site if your going to complain do it somewhere else called the "rant section"

It's because they don't change the games. That's why everybody thinks the older games were better, and the newer ones seem to get worse. You're just getting bored of them.

Clover- wrote I agree that the shot guns are way to extreme. The KSG-12 can kill across map with no problem, etc. Everything else seems perfect to me. The guns are the way they are, because they are "Futuristic" guns. Hint Hint: The game is taken place in 2025 maybe? But, oh well. People normally say a game sucks, because they are horrible at the game. I know you will come back with saying "My K/D is like 1.50, so I do not suck" but then again, you are complaining.

Obviously your stunned bud, the ksg isn't good it has decent range but horrible hit detection so its balanced.. and obviously the game is made in the future

Clover- wrote

OmittingCoder wrote

Clover- wrote I agree that the shot guns are way to extreme. The KSG-12 can kill across map with no problem, etc. Everything else seems perfect to me. The guns are the way they are, because they are "Futuristic" guns. Hint Hint: The game is taken place in 2025 maybe? But, oh well. People normally say a game sucks, because they are horrible at the game. I know you will come back with saying "My K/D is like 1.50, so I do not suck" but then again, you are complaining.

I'm not saying I'm amazing at the game because quite frankly I'm not. I'm just implying that I'm not god awful. But if you think about it and an Assault Rifle should kill faster than a pistol. And it doesn't.

I understand where you are getting at, but think about this situation.

You are standing 4 feet from someone. You have an Assault Rifle, and he has a Pistol. And at the same time, you guys start to shoot. Who will win? Someone with a heavy assault rifle? Or someone with a light pistol who can pull the trigger faster due to the lightness of it?

Yeah I see what you mean... But some of the time it isn't even close range (for me at least). I feel like the pistols (especially that tac gun?) are overpowered. They can take down anything even people with SMGs.