well sell it and move on then don't buy the next one then i think its amazing but you try make a game and see how many people buy it

OmittingCoder wrote I don't understand why this is happening. Ever Call of Duty game after Black Ops 1 was horrible. MW3 is way too easy and boring as ****. Black Ops 2 doesn't make any freakin' sense. The weapons are ****. Pistols are better than Assault Rifles. Shotguns are insane. Only high fire rate guns are good. The damage system is stupid in BO2. Why do they make it this way?

this is ttg, not imma bitch about every call of duty .com
just stop NO ONE cares.

Infinity_Lays wrote COD sucks its terrible they put little to no effor into the game. All of the are the same and don't wow anyone. Look at bf2 bc2 and the look at bf3 and the difference

Biggest load of waffle ever, they evidently put effort into it or they wouldn't have 200000 daily active players, or millions sold, or people still continuously playing it... They changed ALOT, something which the other CoD's havent.

they gradually try to improve it but everyone who i play with who has played since cod4 we all agree cod 4 then waw were the best by miles and they got s*** from there on, mw2 was too easy cus of ump, black ops 1 the famas was stupidly OP then core was incosistent, mw3 mattered about connection so i was going like 120 - 10 everygame and bops2 is just terrible core is so inconsistent, the damage makes no sense, fair enough shotguns are powerful but there able to shoot way to far but they'll never make one better than cod 4 or waw, they think they know what there doing but tbh they seem the noobiest cus all they do is help the bad noobs become better with stupids ideas in the game, personally i think the multiplayer gameplay runs exaactly the same as bops1 just with slight changes that you cant really notice

OmittingCoder wrote I don't understand why this is happening. Ever Call of Duty game after Black Ops 1 was horrible. MW3 is way too easy and boring as ****. Black Ops 2 doesn't make any freakin' sense. The weapons are ****. Pistols are better than Assault Rifles. Shotguns are insane. Only high fire rate guns are good. The damage system is stupid in BO2. Why do they make it this way?

MODERN WARFARE 2 is still the best call of duty.

H0DGERS wrote

OmittingCoder wrote I don't understand why this is happening. Ever Call of Duty game after Black Ops 1 was horrible. MW3 is way too easy and boring as ****. Black Ops 2 doesn't make any freakin' sense. The weapons are ****. Pistols are better than Assault Rifles. Shotguns are insane. Only high fire rate guns are good. The damage system is stupid in BO2. Why do they make it this way?

MODERN WARFARE 2 is still the best call of duty.

its not mw2 was alright, cod 4 has and always be the best cod

upuser wrote

Batch541 wrote

SkoomaTripping wrote The game is balanced. Submachine guns should beat everything but shotguns close range. Pistols should beat assault rifles close range.

Get over it.

hmm...... sub machine guns beating everything. A assault rifle vs a sub machine gun acroos map. sub machine gun wins in bo 2. even though a sub machine gun would have **** accuracy across that map.

Sub machine guns damage drops a lot a distance, and their accuracy.

MSMC is a fu*king sniper, you can easily kill someone across the map with it.

Yea I Agree. It's Boring To Me Too.

SkoomaTripping wrote The game is balanced. Submachine guns should beat everything but shotguns close range. Pistols should beat assault rifles close range.

Get over it.

a assault rifle will **** you up a lot more than a pistol at close range in real life so how is the game balanced its **** shit worst cod of all time

Pistols are better than Assault Rifles. Shotguns are insane. Only high fire rate guns are good. The damage system is stupid in BO2. Why do they make it this way?

yup i know what you mean, Well if you cant beat them Join them

Sadly thats what i had to do