You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
Does this game need improved or is it fine as it is?
Minor improvements needed.
40.00% (2 votes)
40.00% (2 votes)
Major improvements needed.
40.00% (2 votes)
40.00% (2 votes)
I would never touch this game it is fantastic.
20.00% (1 vote)
20.00% (1 vote)
Total Votes: 5
#11. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 13, 201014Year Member
Posts: 86
Reputation Power: 3
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 13, 201014Year Member
Posts: 86
Reputation Power: 3
#12. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 13, 201014Year Member
Posts: 86
Reputation Power: 3
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 13, 201014Year Member
Posts: 86
Reputation Power: 3
GeTxM3rKeD96 wrote You sir are **** Retarded. You and everyone else brought this on themselves they wanted a change in the COD series Riot shield cant be shot through Its Treyarch's first attempt at a shield cut them some slack. Sniper are what everybody asked for EASIER to use. Ghost is level 55 probably to piss kids like you off.(it worked). Shotguns Are a little OP but all you have to do is keep your distance. So quit ***** about the game I bet money you still play it every day grow some balls and quit posting stupid **** on forums.
First, calm down. Second, you are accusing me of asking for these changes when I have not. Lastly, I do play this game regularly but I have other games I play as well. I would not have made this list if I had not played this game for a considerable period of time.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#13. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 03, 201113Year Member
Posts: 5,774
Reputation Power: 280
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 03, 201113Year Member
Posts: 5,774
Reputation Power: 280
i thought the game sucked aswell until i adapted to it and learned how to play it.
now i love it.
now i love it.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#14. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 16, 201212Year Member
Posts: 76
Reputation Power: 4
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 16, 201212Year Member
Posts: 76
Reputation Power: 4
Ehh the knifing does suck and shotguns are OP but once you get used to it thing should get better.
and GeTxM3rKeD96 Just STFU.
and GeTxM3rKeD96 Just STFU.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#15. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 06, 201014Year Member
Posts: 480
Reputation Power: 18
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 06, 201014Year Member
Posts: 480
Reputation Power: 18
i like how you ignore my comment because you know everything i said was right
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#16. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 06, 201212Year Member
Posts: 45
Reputation Power: 1
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 06, 201212Year Member
Posts: 45
Reputation Power: 1
#17. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 13, 201014Year Member
Posts: 86
Reputation Power: 3
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 13, 201014Year Member
Posts: 86
Reputation Power: 3
nellis2010 wrote i agree with some of your points just not all of them.
Ghost is at level 55 as it is a very useful perk and should not be a beginners perk otherwise everyone would use it making UAV's useless and most killstreaks useless.
create a class is great now and its really not very hard to get back to the level you need to get the gun you like and even then you have all your camo's and attachments if fully prestiged or whatever. And also you can carry your favourite gun through.
who would try and hack a sentry gun standing in front of it anyways?
riot shields should be able to be shot through with certain guns.
i understand your frustration with shotguns they are really annoying.
and hit markers never feel like your shooting a juggernaut
Ghost had it's own section because it is one of the two useful perks. No it should not be LvL 55 and no it should not be LvL 20 but 30-40 would be a good range to get this perk.
Assault shields get shot through with every gun that has FMJ ... I do not understand why you made that comment.
The only time you would be behind a sentry gun is if your team spawns behind it.. at that point its not a problem so you don't make sense.
Getting hit markers irritates people and is quite understandable. Juggernaut was just an example so you could understand the feeling.
Are you happy I replied for you?
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#18. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 06, 201212Year Member
Posts: 89
Reputation Power: 3
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 06, 201212Year Member
Posts: 89
Reputation Power: 3
Have none of you thought it was just to make the game more realistic?
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#19. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 13, 201014Year Member
Posts: 86
Reputation Power: 3
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 13, 201014Year Member
Posts: 86
Reputation Power: 3
QStealth wrote Have none of you thought it was just to make the game more realistic?
It is possible that the intentions of Treyarch were to make the game more realistic. Although, the franchise has never been known for realistic combat scenarios, Treyarch could make a game more realistic. However, I do not see this game as very realistic, just a party game.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#20. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 13, 201014Year Member
Posts: 86
Reputation Power: 3
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 13, 201014Year Member
Posts: 86
Reputation Power: 3
CHP wrote i thought the game sucked aswell until i adapted to it and learned how to play it.
now i love it.
The game is playable but, it may be frustrating to a large group of players.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.