You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#11. Posted:
FreeToPlayOnPC
  • TTG Senior
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 26, 201212Year Member
Posts: 1,285
Reputation Power: 58
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 26, 201212Year Member
Posts: 1,285
Reputation Power: 58
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Sapphire is better for overclocking, according to this.
#12. Posted:
CMR
  • V5 Launch
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 18, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,609
Reputation Power: 73
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 18, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,609
Reputation Power: 73
Overclocker wrote
Heartwood wrote Yes you should be fine, but this is better - [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Benchmarks - [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]


You recommended the same card as he listed?

wtf


Yes because reviews say the Gigabyte performs better. Strange I know, but it's from people's personal experience.
#13. Posted:
CMR
  • V5 Launch
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 18, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,609
Reputation Power: 73
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 18, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,609
Reputation Power: 73
VEVO wrote
xplodingtaco1 wrote
Overclocker wrote
Heartwood wrote Yes you should be fine, but this is better - [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Benchmarks - [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]


You recommended the same card as he listed?

wtf

He recommended the Gigabyte version, which is better imo.
They are IDENTICAL in performance. Unless they are overclocked or have somewhat better cooling (performance difference will be still barely noticeable), no matter what manufacture makes them, they are identical in performance unless it's a different series or listed otherwise.


No, I believe the Gigabyte has higher stock clocking speeds.
#14. Posted:
Departure
  • TTG Senior
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 17, 201212Year Member
Posts: 1,094
Reputation Power: 47
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 17, 201212Year Member
Posts: 1,094
Reputation Power: 47
Youll be fine it looks good but a bit pricey.
#15. Posted:
FreeToPlayOnPC
  • TTG Senior
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 26, 201212Year Member
Posts: 1,285
Reputation Power: 58
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 26, 201212Year Member
Posts: 1,285
Reputation Power: 58
Unauthorized wrote Youll be fine it looks good but a bit pricey.

you think that's pricey...
Go to newegg.com and search GTX 690...
#16. Posted:
VEVO
  • TTG Destroyer
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 13, 201014Year Member
Posts: 7,299
Reputation Power: 306
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 13, 201014Year Member
Posts: 7,299
Reputation Power: 306
BRONZ3 wrote
VEVO wrote
xplodingtaco1 wrote
Overclocker wrote
Heartwood wrote Yes you should be fine, but this is better - [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Benchmarks - [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]


You recommended the same card as he listed?

wtf

He recommended the Gigabyte version, which is better imo.
They are IDENTICAL in performance. Unless they are overclocked or have somewhat better cooling (performance difference will be still barely noticeable), no matter what manufacture makes them, they are identical in performance unless it's a different series or listed otherwise.


Gigabytes are "supposed" to have better coolers.
Like I said, since the performance speeds are still stock, there will be no difference besides it being slightly cooler. Woopty doo.
Jump to:
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.