You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#31. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 06, 201212Year Member
Posts: 6,360
Reputation Power: 374
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 06, 201212Year Member
Posts: 6,360
Reputation Power: 374
CDN wrote This is neat, Russia's most powerful non-nuclear bomb.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
No, that isn't neat.
That's horrible, one of the main deterrents for Nuclear War was that it would destroy the Earth in the process, making it pointless.
If you take away this deterrent, future Nuclear [or non-nuclear] war becomes a lot more likely if things only go down from here...
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#32. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 12, 201014Year Member
Posts: 121
Reputation Power: 4
Wez wroteCDN wrote This is neat, Russia's most powerful non-nuclear bomb.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
No, that isn't neat.
That's horrible, one of the main deterrents for Nuclear War was that it would destroy the Earth in the process, making it pointless.
If you take away this deterrent, future Nuclear [or non-nuclear] war becomes a lot more likely if things only go down from here...
Its mainly just the fact that its like a nuclear bomb just with out the radiation or nuclear fallout that got my attention I should have explained that. Kind of bad choice in words/wording on my part. Trust me I don't want nuclear weapons or anything similar just like most people. I look forward toward the human race surviving lol
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#33. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 16, 201113Year Member
Posts: 418
Reputation Power: 16
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 16, 201113Year Member
Posts: 418
Reputation Power: 16
An Anti-matter bomb is more powerful then a nuclear bomb
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#34. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 01, 201113Year Member
Posts: 8,932
Reputation Power: 415
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 01, 201113Year Member
Posts: 8,932
Reputation Power: 415
SheriffMeow wrote An Anti-matter bomb is more powerful then a nuclear bomb
Anti-matter bomb's don't exist due to it costing too much to make. Although, I believe the Hydrogen Bomb is the most powerful bomb at this moment in time.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#35. Posted:
Status: Online
Joined: May 23, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,675
Reputation Power: 33918
Motto: This Film Is Dedicated To The Brave Mujahideen Fighters Of Afghanistan
Motto: This Film Is Dedicated To The Brave Mujahideen Fighters Of Afghanistan
Status: Online
Joined: May 23, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,675
Reputation Power: 33918
Motto: This Film Is Dedicated To The Brave Mujahideen Fighters Of Afghanistan
A nuclear weapon is powerful, but not "Destroy the entire USA" Powerful. One 50 Megaton Nuclear weapon would take out about 1/2-3/4 of New York City. Now guessing that the US has a stockpile of these, we could probably destroy half the nation with our own stockpile. But, there is a UN nuclear arms treaty, and countries have agreed never to use a nuclear weapon on foreign soil while the act is in place. So...if someone breaks that treaty...there are also an entire list-full of nuclear weaponized countries to defend themselves. So no, I do not believe these will be used as of today, and I doubt anyone has a weapons stockpile nuclear capable to destroy the Unite States, or Europe. So I feel safe right where I'm at.
- 1useful
- 1not useful
#36. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 01, 201113Year Member
Posts: 8,932
Reputation Power: 415
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 01, 201113Year Member
Posts: 8,932
Reputation Power: 415
TTGxBANANAS wrote A nuclear weapon is powerful, but not "Destroy the entire USA" Powerful. One 50 Megaton Nuclear weapon would take out about 1/2-3/4 of New York City. Now guessing that the US has a stockpile of these, we could probably destroy half the nation with our own stockpile. But, there is a UN nuclear arms treaty, and countries have agreed never to use a nuclear weapon on foreign soil while the act is in place. So...if someone breaks that treaty...there are also an entire list-full of nuclear weaponized countries to defend themselves. So no, I do not believe these will be used as of today, and I doubt anyone has a weapons stockpile nuclear capable to destroy the Unite States, or Europe. So I feel safe right where I'm at.
That all depends on who's waging the war. If Russia, N. Korea, Japan and China waged war on the UK, US and some of Europe, we'd most likely lose.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#37. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 09, 201212Year Member
Posts: 189
Reputation Power: 7
Im sure the americans will test their new weapon on someone soon
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#38. Posted:
Status: Online
Joined: May 23, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,675
Reputation Power: 33918
Motto: This Film Is Dedicated To The Brave Mujahideen Fighters Of Afghanistan
Motto: This Film Is Dedicated To The Brave Mujahideen Fighters Of Afghanistan
Status: Online
Joined: May 23, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,675
Reputation Power: 33918
Motto: This Film Is Dedicated To The Brave Mujahideen Fighters Of Afghanistan
Compete wrote Im sure the americans will test their new weapon on someone soon
Why would we? We are in a depression, full of maniacs shooting up daycares, and are still trying to completely end a war. We have no reason to launch nuclear weapons against another country, and probably never will unless fired at first. We may be full of idiots and corrupt politics, but we still follow the rules of warfare
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#39. Posted:
Status: Online
Joined: May 23, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,675
Reputation Power: 33918
Motto: This Film Is Dedicated To The Brave Mujahideen Fighters Of Afghanistan
Motto: This Film Is Dedicated To The Brave Mujahideen Fighters Of Afghanistan
Status: Online
Joined: May 23, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,675
Reputation Power: 33918
Motto: This Film Is Dedicated To The Brave Mujahideen Fighters Of Afghanistan
Pyre wroteMhm. Most of our hope is riding on the fact that N. Korea will just blow itself up in civil war, and China and Japan realize 60% of their exports go to us ._. SO hopefully we are deemed somewhat important to the world lolTTGxBANANAS wrote A nuclear weapon is powerful, but not "Destroy the entire USA" Powerful. One 50 Megaton Nuclear weapon would take out about 1/2-3/4 of New York City. Now guessing that the US has a stockpile of these, we could probably destroy half the nation with our own stockpile. But, there is a UN nuclear arms treaty, and countries have agreed never to use a nuclear weapon on foreign soil while the act is in place. So...if someone breaks that treaty...there are also an entire list-full of nuclear weaponized countries to defend themselves. So no, I do not believe these will be used as of today, and I doubt anyone has a weapons stockpile nuclear capable to destroy the Unite States, or Europe. So I feel safe right where I'm at.
That all depends on who's waging the war. If Russia, N. Korea, Japan and China waged war on the UK, US and some of Europe, we'd most likely lose.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#40. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 09, 201311Year Member
Posts: 56
Reputation Power: 4
Nuclear War is definitely on the table for everyone's next option... But, I think in terms of everything that everyone has lived for, we would all, as humans, have common sense and let that option alone. Although, we are inching closer to a new war, WW3. Our allies may seem like they agreed on the terms we gave them to be our allies, but in reality, they all absolutely hate us. We're different, they're different. Most are communist controlled and hate our political government and the rest just hate how we control our freedoms. The saying " Make peace/love not war " means nothing anymore. Heck, us Americans hardly make anything on our own anymore. In my opinion, America is lazy, but yet, a highly controlled environment with a bit of over protection. Nuke<Hydrogen bomb....
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.