McGeady wrote Idk why they dont just ban guns already.

theirs so many mistakes with this one of them the ARMY

Yin wrote

Click to View Content

661King wrote

Chiellini wrote

661King wrote

Chiellini wrote

661King wrote

Chiellini wrote

661King wrote

Chiellini wrote

Pyre wrote

Chiellini wrote

Pyre wrote

ExoticWolfs wrote

Once again, I'll refer you back to my previous post. In Britain, the last mass shooting at a school was 40 years ago. We haven't had one since we put a ban in place afterwards. Yes, there's always going to be psychotic murderers out there, but, I'd feel much safer if I knew those phycho's didn't have a gun in their hand (which I do feel safe because I know they can't go to the nearest store and pick up an assault rifle).

Point is, you Americans can sit back and just watch these mass shootings of innocent kids go on and at the end of the day, all you care about are your guns. I mean, how many more shootings of presidents or innocent people will it take before you ban them?

What good is that doing for you guys. Sitting back and watching kids die? And it isnt easy just to get rid of guns, there would be so much more problems.

Ugh, why can't you ignorant people comprehend that if there were no guns, you wouldn't need guns to protect yourselves. Yes, it'll be difficult, but surely that's better in the long run?

What about all the guns that people already own? You think the military is going to rush into millions of peoples homes and find every gun and destroy it? Just the thought scares me. The riots and protests would be insane.. No need to call us ignorant when we are just debating. :facepalm:

I have no idea how the American government would handle banning guns. But they should do it. Blah blah blah it's against my rights. What about those kids who were shot innocently? They HAD rights, and now, because some crazy kid was able to buy a gun at a store, took away their rights.

Okay, I'm going to give you a hypothetical question, say one of your parents, or close relatives was shot dead for NO reason, would you be or against guns? Give me an honest answer.

Yea um I know for a fact a KID did not just walk up into a gun store and buy a gun. He got it from someone. And yea that kind of stuff happens, and I would be pretty upset but we can't just go out and ban every single gun. People die from illegal and legal drugs too, so how do we go about stopping that? All I know is changing the Constitution would make Americans furious. Why don't we just go back to school security, since so many killings are happening at schools now?

Actually, gun show loopholes. You can literally walk up to a guy at a gun show and buy 10 AR-15s without background checks, a drivers license, or proof of residency. All you have to do is show him the money. If drugs were legalized and regulated, there would be less ODs. Patriot Act and NDAA got rid of our 1st amendment. Americans didn't care. So our schools should be more like third world countries? Where your kids can get shot for being kids.

After reading doing a google search about gun show loopholes, I found that regulated gun shows require background checks for gun purchases. You can buy guns illegally from alot of places though. It's the same with any other illegal thing in the U.S.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Yahoo answers is opinionated. The other site isnt really credible since its a sub domain.

All you have to do is go up to a person selling from his "private collection" and buy the guns. You do not have to have a license to sell your guns at a gun show(in most areas).

NOTE: I have looked for the specific clip about the Vangaurd documantery and only found this clip. I do NOT always share views with current and the young turks.

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

People would buy AR-15s illegally if gun bans were placed on them. Some things you just can't stop. Gun bans = enraged Americans who want their 2nd Amendment, no protection for people that were actually responsible with their guns before the ban, and an advantage to bad people that buy guns illegally.

Why would a law abiding citizen break the law and buy an AR-15 if its illegal? Then they would become criminals. Even if Americans get enraged, they wont do anything. Proof: NDAA, Patriot Act, Backdoor bailouts, etc. You can still protect yourself with a hand gun or a shot gun. If bad people had to go through a background check and mental health check, im pretty sure the wont pass. Also, 40% of guns sold are bought using the loophole. If you got rid of the loophole and be required to run background checks less criminals would get guns.

source: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Law abiding citizens want protection. If all guns were banned, you would have to get them illegally, not just AR-15s. Are you against people having guns at all? I can't tell what side you are on because you keep talking about how easy it is to get a gun, which is not the topic.

They wouldn't be law abiding if they break the law. As you can see by my previous posts, I'm only talking about assault rifles. I don't have to be on either side to know that its extremely easy to get a gun with the current laws.

Because unconstitutional laws aren't laws. If the government creates laws that goes against the Constitution, we have every right to go against them. Abiding to the Constitution is the only lawful thing. The government's laws are secondary. If they happened to ban all guns, or even just one type of gun, you have every right to break that law. You would only be unlawful to the police. They have no authority to say what is lawful or not. They only enforce the laws. They took an oath to uphold the Constitution. Any law that goes against it is unconstitutional and they have no right to enforce. If they do enforce it, they are breaking the law. Unconstitutional laws aren't laws.

The government has the power to amend the constitution with enough support. Which means, with support, they can pass the ban and enforce it. You don't have the right to break the law. You have the right to "take back your government" but America has proven over and over again they wont do anything no matter how badly they are being screwed over. Also, its the courts who decide whats unconstitutional, not you.

gothkid72 wrote A 14 year old boy got shot in the back of the head at Price Middle School and is said to be alert, conscious, and responding. [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Who doesn't get shot now days and for gun bans just to let everyone know i cant go tell my gun to get up and shoot some one i physically have to pull the trigger the gun don't do it for me GUNS DON'T KILL PEOPLE , PEOPLE KILL PEOPLE

P.s: there's a crewel world out there nothing we can do about it

[/quote]GUNS DON'T KILL PEOPLE , PEOPLE KILL PEOPLE [/quote]

Well there you go then .. LETS BAN PEOPLE !!.

CHIEF KEEF BANG BANG!!!!!!!! :arrow:

Wraith wrote GUNS DON'T KILL PEOPLE , PEOPLE KILL PEOPLE

Explain to me then why Canada, the UK, Australia, and virtually every other country that has implemented gun control has seen a reduction in gun violence?

Terriblw
Pray for hits loved ones

McGeady wrote Idk why they dont just ban guns already.

All that is going to happen is, the people that illegally get firearms, will still illegally get firearms, and the people that do follow the rules, will not have anything to defend themselves with.

661King wrote

Yin wrote

Click to View Content

661King wrote

Chiellini wrote

661King wrote

Chiellini wrote

661King wrote

Chiellini wrote

661King wrote

Chiellini wrote

Pyre wrote

Chiellini wrote

Pyre wrote

ExoticWolfs wrote

Once again, I'll refer you back to my previous post. In Britain, the last mass shooting at a school was 40 years ago. We haven't had one since we put a ban in place afterwards. Yes, there's always going to be psychotic murderers out there, but, I'd feel much safer if I knew those phycho's didn't have a gun in their hand (which I do feel safe because I know they can't go to the nearest store and pick up an assault rifle).

Point is, you Americans can sit back and just watch these mass shootings of innocent kids go on and at the end of the day, all you care about are your guns. I mean, how many more shootings of presidents or innocent people will it take before you ban them?

What good is that doing for you guys. Sitting back and watching kids die? And it isnt easy just to get rid of guns, there would be so much more problems.

Ugh, why can't you ignorant people comprehend that if there were no guns, you wouldn't need guns to protect yourselves. Yes, it'll be difficult, but surely that's better in the long run?

What about all the guns that people already own? You think the military is going to rush into millions of peoples homes and find every gun and destroy it? Just the thought scares me. The riots and protests would be insane.. No need to call us ignorant when we are just debating. :facepalm:

I have no idea how the American government would handle banning guns. But they should do it. Blah blah blah it's against my rights. What about those kids who were shot innocently? They HAD rights, and now, because some crazy kid was able to buy a gun at a store, took away their rights.

Okay, I'm going to give you a hypothetical question, say one of your parents, or close relatives was shot dead for NO reason, would you be or against guns? Give me an honest answer.

Yea um I know for a fact a KID did not just walk up into a gun store and buy a gun. He got it from someone. And yea that kind of stuff happens, and I would be pretty upset but we can't just go out and ban every single gun. People die from illegal and legal drugs too, so how do we go about stopping that? All I know is changing the Constitution would make Americans furious. Why don't we just go back to school security, since so many killings are happening at schools now?

Actually, gun show loopholes. You can literally walk up to a guy at a gun show and buy 10 AR-15s without background checks, a drivers license, or proof of residency. All you have to do is show him the money. If drugs were legalized and regulated, there would be less ODs. Patriot Act and NDAA got rid of our 1st amendment. Americans didn't care. So our schools should be more like third world countries? Where your kids can get shot for being kids.

After reading doing a google search about gun show loopholes, I found that regulated gun shows require background checks for gun purchases. You can buy guns illegally from alot of places though. It's the same with any other illegal thing in the U.S.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Yahoo answers is opinionated. The other site isnt really credible since its a sub domain.

All you have to do is go up to a person selling from his "private collection" and buy the guns. You do not have to have a license to sell your guns at a gun show(in most areas).

NOTE: I have looked for the specific clip about the Vangaurd documantery and only found this clip. I do NOT always share views with current and the young turks.

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

People would buy AR-15s illegally if gun bans were placed on them. Some things you just can't stop. Gun bans = enraged Americans who want their 2nd Amendment, no protection for people that were actually responsible with their guns before the ban, and an advantage to bad people that buy guns illegally.

Why would a law abiding citizen break the law and buy an AR-15 if its illegal? Then they would become criminals. Even if Americans get enraged, they wont do anything. Proof: NDAA, Patriot Act, Backdoor bailouts, etc. You can still protect yourself with a hand gun or a shot gun. If bad people had to go through a background check and mental health check, im pretty sure the wont pass. Also, 40% of guns sold are bought using the loophole. If you got rid of the loophole and be required to run background checks less criminals would get guns.

source: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Law abiding citizens want protection. If all guns were banned, you would have to get them illegally, not just AR-15s. Are you against people having guns at all? I can't tell what side you are on because you keep talking about how easy it is to get a gun, which is not the topic.

They wouldn't be law abiding if they break the law. As you can see by my previous posts, I'm only talking about assault rifles. I don't have to be on either side to know that its extremely easy to get a gun with the current laws.

Because unconstitutional laws aren't laws. If the government creates laws that goes against the Constitution, we have every right to go against them. Abiding to the Constitution is the only lawful thing. The government's laws are secondary. If they happened to ban all guns, or even just one type of gun, you have every right to break that law. You would only be unlawful to the police. They have no authority to say what is lawful or not. They only enforce the laws. They took an oath to uphold the Constitution. Any law that goes against it is unconstitutional and they have no right to enforce. If they do enforce it, they are breaking the law. Unconstitutional laws aren't laws.

The government has the power to amend the constitution with enough support. Which means, with support, they can pass the ban and enforce it. You don't have the right to break the law. You have the right to "take back your government" but America has proven over and over again they wont do anything no matter how badly they are being screwed over. Also, its the courts who decide whats unconstitutional, not you.

But they can't at the same time, because there would be a massive revolution, no one is going to give up their guns just because they tell us to.

McGeady wrote Idk why they dont just ban guns already.

Is that your answer to every tragedy. Just ban it? I own over 20 guns. Anywhere from WW2 german mausers to AR15's and ak47's. I have not killed one person. Why should i be punished? Not to mention more people die from hammers and drunk drivers every year then gun murders. So why dont we ban cars and hammers?