No, It wasn't.

That video is completely fabricated.
The makers of it have edited clips to make the person in the clip look guilty of something they are not. Take the woman in the interview laughing about something that you can't hear because the audio is switched off. The video insinuates that she shouldn't be laughing like that because she just lost a child. Well no, she is laughing and smiling because she is reminiscing about her child when she was alive. How she would smile at her before getting on the bus and be off to school.
The audio was switched off though, so it looks incriminating, while it is a very normal action.
The man smiling and laughing before taking the podium then his mood suddenly changes is also a false accusation.
He has just lost a child, anyone who has been to a funeral will see people snap in and out of happiness and sadness because people deal with death differently. To assume you know how and what this man is feeling and thinking about it insulting.
Perhaps he was doing the same as the woman above, reminiscing about his child which made him happy, then he suddenly snapped back to reality and realized where he was and why he was there which caused the sudden change.

The mortician is self explanatory really, he's a bit quirky.
Think about what that man does for a living and what he has just seen before the media shoved microphones in his face which probably contributed to his weird behavior massively. He looks at and examines dead bodies for a living.
You can only do that for so long before you start to become a little creepy in the eyes of other people.
Perhaps his strange head movements and facial ticks are a coping mechanism he uses to deal with the horrors of his job and seeing the bullet ridden dead bodies of the children killed that day.

The man in the woods wearing army trousers, if the people making the video actually did research, was a teacher there going in to help the children make food but he was running a little late.
He was wearing the army trousers because he considered them to be old and didn't mind getting them dirty with food mix, which probably would have been inevitable considering he was going to be making it with a bunch of kids.
Simple as.
The woman's name in the database was a simple error when they made the video, they didn't take her name for a shortened version of her real name which if they had of searched in the database, they would have found her records.

The child's dresses were obviously a hand me down to their daughter, there is nothing weird about that at all.
The old man who claimed to harbor and keep kids safe.
So what?
He's an old man looking for his 15 minutes of fame.
That doesn't mean there's a conspiracy in place.

The thing about there being no ambulances is, sorry to put it vulgarly, bullsh*t.
There are plenty of pictures of ambulances there just after the event took place, the media jumped on that bandwagon and they looked like fools after.
Even a high ranking official and ex-FEMA workers have said that they run emergency drills and practices all the time.
New York is a major city and so is London, large terrorist targets, they probably would have had these drills happening most of the time in both cities.
I think it's coincidence that Sandy Hook had one, but I can guarantee due to the fabricated nature of this video there wasn't even one running near Sandy Hook, probably a few towns away but they're instantly making the weakest connections they can.

The pages on Facebook etc set up days before the incident is simple to explain.
You can change the names of your Facebook page and most site pages to a new thing whenever you want. Why would people make brand new pages dedicated to Sandy Hook when they could simply edit an old one which already had people subscribed and following it?

This video is dumb.
The makers don't even believe it is a hoax or they wouldn't have needed to mute that interview.

I'm not saying it couldn't have been a conspiracy, i'm just saying that if the Government of the United States wanted to set this up to increase gun control they wouldn't have made this many mistakes, that when you look at it closer are not really mistakes, just misinformation taken out of context by a couple of sad video makers who wanted to spread fear and induce panic.

Which they succeeded in doing by the looks of it.

TL:DR

The video is stupid and makes no sense.

I have a friend in another forum that lost his son to this shooting. It's not a hoax, nor should we be supporting this being a hoax. People died, you can't fake that. Stop spreading around the hoax bullsh*t because it's fake, please.

At the start of the video. You moron.

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Why would you even post this, people lost their lives in this situation. Imagine what you are doing but turned around to your side. Like this:

When you have kids and they go off to school and get killed in a school shooting would you want people starting rumors saying that it was fake and photo shopping all of this to make it look fake? I think you wouldn't. For all of you who think it's fake I'm sorry but you must be insane. Please delete this post.

There has been some specilation about that video, but it WAS NOT a hoax, you cannot fake that many deaths, and innocent little children died. I think this post should be deleted.

it is not a hoax so please dont say it is

Sith wrote No, It wasn't.

That video is completely fabricated.
The makers of it have edited clips to make the person in the clip look guilty of something they are not. Take the woman in the interview laughing about something that you can't hear because the audio is switched off. The video insinuates that she shouldn't be laughing like that because she just lost a child. Well no, she is laughing and smiling because she is reminiscing about her child when she was alive. How should would smile at her before getting on the bus and be off to school. The audio was switched off though, so it looks incriminating, while it is a very normal action.
The man smiling and laughing before taking the podium then his mood suddenly changes is also a false accusation. He has just lost a child, anyone who has been to a funeral will see people snap in and out of happiness and sadness because people deal with death differently. To assume you know how and what this man is feeling and thinking about it insulting. Perhaps he was doing the same as the woman above, reminiscing about his child which made him happy, then he suddenly snapped back to reality and realized where he was and why he was there which caused the sudden change.

The mortician is self explanatory really, he's a bit quirky. Think about what that man does for a living and what he has just seen before the media shoved microphones in his face which probably contributed to his weird behavior massively. He looks at and examines dead bodies for a living.
You can only do that for so long before you start to become a little creepy in the eyes of other people.
Perhaps his strange head movements and facial ticks are a coping mechanism he uses to deal with the horrors of his job and seeing the bullet ridden dead bodies of the children killed that day.

The man in the woods wearing army trousers, if the people making the video actually did research, was a teacher there going in to help the children make food but he was running a little late. He was wearing the army trousers because he considered them to be old and didn't mind getting them dirty with food mix, which probably would have been inevitable considering he was going to be making it with a bunch of kids.
Simple as.
The woman's name in the database was a simple error when they made the video, they didn't take her name for a shortened version of her real name which if they had of searched in the database, they would have found her records.

The child's dresses were obviously a hand me down to their daughter, there is nothing weird about that at all.
The old man who claimed to harbor and keep kids safe.
So what?
He's an old man looking for his 15 minutes of fame.
That doesn't mean there's a conspiracy in place.

The thing about there being no ambulances is, sorry to put it vulgarly, ********. There are plenty of pictures of ambulances there just after the event took place, the media jumped on that bandwagon and it made them look a fool of themselves after.
Even a high ranking official and ex FEMA workers have said that they run emergency drills and practices all the time. New York is a major city and so is London, they probably would have had these drills happening most of the time in both cities, I think it's coincidence that Sandy Hook had one, but I can guarantee due to the fabricated nature of this video there wasn't even one running near Sandy Hook, probably a few towns away but they're instantly making the weakest connections they can.

This video is dumb. The makers don't even believe it is a hoax or they wouldn't have needed to mute that interview.

I'm not saying it couldn't have been a conspiracy, i'm just saying that if the Government of the United States wanted to set this up to increase gun control they wouldn't have made this many mistakes, that when you look at it closer are not really mistakes, just misinformation taken out of context by a couple of sad video makers who wanted to spread fear and induce panic.

Which they succeeded in doing by the look of it.

Watch the last 4 minutes of that video and then please explain to me why those pages were created 4 days before the event took place.

I'm not saying believe it was a hoax, but that ending really is weird.

sBs-NIGHTMARE wrote

Sith wrote No, It wasn't.

That video is completely fabricated.
The makers of it have edited clips to make the person in the clip look guilty of something they are not. Take the woman in the interview laughing about something that you can't hear because the audio is switched off. The video insinuates that she shouldn't be laughing like that because she just lost a child. Well no, she is laughing and smiling because she is reminiscing about her child when she was alive. How should would smile at her before getting on the bus and be off to school. The audio was switched off though, so it looks incriminating, while it is a very normal action.
The man smiling and laughing before taking the podium then his mood suddenly changes is also a false accusation. He has just lost a child, anyone who has been to a funeral will see people snap in and out of happiness and sadness because people deal with death differently. To assume you know how and what this man is feeling and thinking about it insulting. Perhaps he was doing the same as the woman above, reminiscing about his child which made him happy, then he suddenly snapped back to reality and realized where he was and why he was there which caused the sudden change.

The mortician is self explanatory really, he's a bit quirky. Think about what that man does for a living and what he has just seen before the media shoved microphones in his face which probably contributed to his weird behavior massively. He looks at and examines dead bodies for a living.
You can only do that for so long before you start to become a little creepy in the eyes of other people.
Perhaps his strange head movements and facial ticks are a coping mechanism he uses to deal with the horrors of his job and seeing the bullet ridden dead bodies of the children killed that day.

The man in the woods wearing army trousers, if the people making the video actually did research, was a teacher there going in to help the children make food but he was running a little late. He was wearing the army trousers because he considered them to be old and didn't mind getting them dirty with food mix, which probably would have been inevitable considering he was going to be making it with a bunch of kids.
Simple as.
The woman's name in the database was a simple error when they made the video, they didn't take her name for a shortened version of her real name which if they had of searched in the database, they would have found her records.

The child's dresses were obviously a hand me down to their daughter, there is nothing weird about that at all.
The old man who claimed to harbor and keep kids safe.
So what?
He's an old man looking for his 15 minutes of fame.
That doesn't mean there's a conspiracy in place.

The thing about there being no ambulances is, sorry to put it vulgarly, ********. There are plenty of pictures of ambulances there just after the event took place, the media jumped on that bandwagon and it made them look a fool of themselves after.
Even a high ranking official and ex FEMA workers have said that they run emergency drills and practices all the time. New York is a major city and so is London, they probably would have had these drills happening most of the time in both cities, I think it's coincidence that Sandy Hook had one, but I can guarantee due to the fabricated nature of this video there wasn't even one running near Sandy Hook, probably a few towns away but they're instantly making the weakest connections they can.

This video is dumb. The makers don't even believe it is a hoax or they wouldn't have needed to mute that interview.

I'm not saying it couldn't have been a conspiracy, i'm just saying that if the Government of the United States wanted to set this up to increase gun control they wouldn't have made this many mistakes, that when you look at it closer are not really mistakes, just misinformation taken out of context by a couple of sad video makers who wanted to spread fear and induce panic.

Which they succeeded in doing by the look of it.

Watch the last 4 minutes of that video and then please explain to me why those pages were created 4 days before the event took place.

I'm not saying believe it was a hoax, but that ending really is weird.

They were created days and sometimes months before the event because people changed names of their pages to Sandy Hook memorial pages because they already had people subscribed to them.

Why would you make a brand new page and start from scratch if you already have a page made that you can just change the name of and off you go?