You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#11. Posted:
Vancouver_Canucks
  • Summer 2018
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 04, 201014Year Member
Posts: 6,598
Reputation Power: 276
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 04, 201014Year Member
Posts: 6,598
Reputation Power: 276
I wouldnt trust people with a javelin at my school never mind a firearm.
#12. Posted:
ABR
  • Powerhouse
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 201212Year Member
Posts: 465
Reputation Power: 18
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 201212Year Member
Posts: 465
Reputation Power: 18
Good idea, they just chose a really bad time to do this.
#13. Posted:
ip
  • Winter 2020
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 30, 201211Year Member
Posts: 3,778
Reputation Power: 3016
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 30, 201211Year Member
Posts: 3,778
Reputation Power: 3016
I think that this is a cool thing. I would like to see it, but Mr. Obama is getting too strict on use. They take away rights that we have the right to have and are telling us what to do. I mean, its like they are tearing up the Constitution and throwing it out the god damn window. This makes me upset because I love my guns that I have, and they take them from me. I am only 14, but who cares. Lets take away thousands of dollars that our American people have spent on their collection and say you can't do anything about is. This is my thought on the "Weapon" Law. If I could call it that.
#14. Posted:
sukraM
  • TTG Senior
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 03, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,195
Reputation Power: 72
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 03, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,195
Reputation Power: 72
Would'nt work becaus there are immature people in this world that would joke around with a gun and someone would end up getting hurt simple as that.
#15. Posted:
Yang
  • Challenger
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 07, 201311Year Member
Posts: 187
Reputation Power: 7
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 07, 201311Year Member
Posts: 187
Reputation Power: 7
I don't think it's that safe... Because, Who knows somebody could be on drugs & get angry and shoot people.
#16. Posted:
DySu
  • Prospect
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 03, 201212Year Member
Posts: 609
Reputation Power: 27
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 03, 201212Year Member
Posts: 609
Reputation Power: 27
Yang wrote I don't think it's that safe... Because, Who knows somebody could be on drugs & get angry and shoot people.

There's drug tests every month, so the chance of a athlete being stupid enough to take drugs when there's surprise drugs tests just doesn't seem logical.
#17. Posted:
Tactrus
  • TTG Senior
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 24, 201212Year Member
Posts: 1,525
Reputation Power: 62
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 24, 201212Year Member
Posts: 1,525
Reputation Power: 62
I think it is wrong. Just another way for someone to get injured.
#18. Posted:
r00t
  • Administrator
Status: Offline
Joined: May 18, 201113Year Member
Posts: 16,419
Reputation Power: 24469
Status: Offline
Joined: May 18, 201113Year Member
Posts: 16,419
Reputation Power: 24469
yop wrote I think it is wrong. Just another way for someone to get injured.

There is one drowning for every 11,000 pools, each year. In a country of 6 million pools, 550 children under the age of 10 drown each year. One child is killed by gun for every 1 million-plus guns. In a country with an estimated 200 million guns, an estimated 175 children under 10 die each year.

Logically, then would we not ban pools before we ban guns? Think of the children!

Fear/outrage =/= real danger.
Jump to:
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.