You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#11. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 17, 201311Year Member
Posts: 1,540
Reputation Power: 67
4-3-1-2 worked well for me.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#12. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 03, 201311Year Member
Posts: 59
Reputation Power: 2
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 03, 201311Year Member
Posts: 59
Reputation Power: 2
4-3-1-2 for me... i have tried a ton, too...
others i like are 4-3-3, 4-1-2-1-2, and 4-5-1
others i like are 4-3-3, 4-1-2-1-2, and 4-5-1
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#13. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 22, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,082
Reputation Power: 89
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 22, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,082
Reputation Power: 89
Personally I love the 4-3-2-1 formation. But it really depends on your play style.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.