Lewis-E wrote

VexerZ wrote

Lewis-E wrote

VexerZ wrote

Lewis-E wrote Fifa rated him too highly. He's not as good as 87.

I don't support any team in the BPL but he has been a Chelsea hero since he has came and has served as a game winner for them in quite a number of matches.

I'm not saying he's not good or a Chelsea hero. Just not an 87 player.

The European Champions last season and he is their best player this season but not worthy of an 87. No logic once again in that one

Do you know what logic means. It's perfect logic. I do not think he should be rated 87.

Right mate, are you still flapping those lips?

I'm gonna take you back to school.

You need a point (your point is that Hazard should be an 86)
You need explanation (um, yeah you haven't got that far)
You need evidence (WHOOPS, EY?)

SO COME ON BRUV, TAKE THE STAGE, BYE!

There is no right and wrong. It's merely opinion. If fifa had rated him 84 I would of said upgraded to an 85/6.

Intoccabile wrote

Lewis-E wrote

VexerZ wrote

Lewis-E wrote

VexerZ wrote

Lewis-E wrote Fifa rated him too highly. He's not as good as 87.

I don't support any team in the BPL but he has been a Chelsea hero since he has came and has served as a game winner for them in quite a number of matches.

I'm not saying he's not good or a Chelsea hero. Just not an 87 player.

The European Champions last season and he is their best player this season but not worthy of an 87. No logic once again in that one

Do you know what logic means. It's perfect logic. I do not think he should be rated 87.

Right mate, are you still flapping those lips?

I'm gonna take you back to school.

You need a point (your point is that Hazard should be an 86)
You need explanation (um, yeah you haven't got that far)
You need evidence (WHOOPS, EY?)

SO COME ON BRUV, TAKE THE STAGE, BYE!

Get a firm grip of your life.

We got alot of argueing going on in this thread! Respect someones opinion guys! Any more opinions we should see?

Intoccabile wrote

Lewis-E wrote Doesn't make sense. I'm saying for example Bale, probably going to be rated 87, is a MUCH MUCH better player than Hazard. Therefore should be higher rated. Hence making hazard an 86.

NO BALE ISN'T A MUCH BETTER PLAYER YOU KNOBBER, HE IS OVERATTED AND FOREVER SOUTHAMPTON'S, HE IS NO BETTER THAN HAZARD, NO WORSE. They are the same in different ways.

Go back to your armchair you recliner fan.

are you **** joking, hazards a good player and had an decent season but bale this season has been sensational, hazard should be 85/86 and bale should be 87/88

-Burnley- wrote

Intoccabile wrote

Lewis-E wrote Doesn't make sense. I'm saying for example Bale, probably going to be rated 87, is a MUCH MUCH better player than Hazard. Therefore should be higher rated. Hence making hazard an 86.

NO BALE ISN'T A MUCH BETTER PLAYER YOU KNOBBER, HE IS OVERATTED AND FOREVER SOUTHAMPTON'S, HE IS NO BETTER THAN HAZARD, NO WORSE. They are the same in different ways.

Go back to your armchair you recliner fan.

are you **** joking, hazards a good player and had an decent season but bale this season has been sensational, hazard should be 85/86 and bale should be 87/88

Thankyou. Finally someone agrees.

If Benteke is not rated 80+ i will be maaad!

Ioway wrote If Benteke is not rated 80+ i will be maaad!

i know, but knowing ea he will be about 77/78

Think how good a Belgium team would be if fellani, benteke, lukaku and vertongen got An upgrade. Possibly Kompany aswell.

UP:



DOWN:


I might have left some people out.
My mind went blank when I tried to do this.