You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
Who will win?
Blue
90.91% (30 votes)
90.91% (30 votes)
Red
9.09% (3 votes)
9.09% (3 votes)
Total Votes: 33
WW3 Teams Who will win?
Posted:
WW3 Teams Who will win?Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 21, 201212Year Member
Posts: 249
Reputation Power: 10
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 21, 201212Year Member
Posts: 249
Reputation Power: 10
So if WW3 was to start
-----------
Blue
-----------
Britain
America
S. Korea
Canada
Greenland
Iceland
S. Africa
Spain
France
Germany
Poland
Italy
Bulgaria
Romania
Greece
Turkey
Syria
Mexico
Australia
India
Japan
Finland
Sweden
Norway
New Zealand
-----------
Vs
-----------
Red
-----------
Russia
N. Korea
Brazil
Argentina
Uruguay
Chile
Colombia
Bolivia
Paraguay
N. Africa
Iraq
Iran
Saudi Arabia
Afghanistan
Pakistan
Yemen
Mongolia
Oman
Vietnam
-----------
China are Neutral
-----------
This is not for certain, it's just a prediction
Blue vs Red who will win?
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Last edited by ZohoDistance ; edited 2 times in total
-----------
Blue
-----------
Britain
America
S. Korea
Canada
Greenland
Iceland
S. Africa
Spain
France
Germany
Poland
Italy
Bulgaria
Romania
Greece
Turkey
Syria
Mexico
Australia
India
Japan
Finland
Sweden
Norway
New Zealand
-----------
Vs
-----------
Red
-----------
Russia
N. Korea
Brazil
Argentina
Uruguay
Chile
Colombia
Bolivia
Paraguay
N. Africa
Iraq
Iran
Saudi Arabia
Afghanistan
Pakistan
Yemen
Mongolia
Oman
Vietnam
-----------
China are Neutral
-----------
This is not for certain, it's just a prediction
Blue vs Red who will win?
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Last edited by ZohoDistance ; edited 2 times in total
#2. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 25, 201113Year Member
Posts: 3,539
Reputation Power: 704
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 25, 201113Year Member
Posts: 3,539
Reputation Power: 704
First of all, you're teams are all wrong. I'm Pretty sure Mexico and China would be on our side seeing as how we are their biggest source for the economic success. So why would they want to go against someone that they do trade with?
Also, the other reason Mexico wouldn't go against the US is because of NAFTA.
Also, the other reason Mexico wouldn't go against the US is because of NAFTA.
- 7useful
- 0not useful
#3. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 12, 201113Year Member
Posts: 3,979
Reputation Power: 229
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 12, 201113Year Member
Posts: 3,979
Reputation Power: 229
I have to agree with the person above me. I do not see how (as well as what the person above has wrote) the U.S. and Russia would go to war like this. They're building bridges between the two nations now. (They're not literally building a bridge that connects the two its more like separating their differences for the sake of the world.)
- 0useful
- 1not useful
#4. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 21, 201212Year Member
Posts: 249
Reputation Power: 10
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 21, 201212Year Member
Posts: 249
Reputation Power: 10
China are allies with N.Korea. and idk about mexico
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#5. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 27, 201311Year Member
Posts: 13
Reputation Power: 0
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 27, 201311Year Member
Posts: 13
Reputation Power: 0
ZohoDistance wrote China are allies with N.Korea. and idk about mexico
They are, but they even said that they will not defend N. Korea because they are annouying. Also China would lose Trillions of dollors in there economy that they have invested in the USA. Also Mexico is an allie and America and Europe supply them with weapons and materials.
- 0useful
- 2not useful
#6. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 20, 201211Year Member
Posts: 1,197
Reputation Power: 38
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 20, 201211Year Member
Posts: 1,197
Reputation Power: 38
First off teams are wrong.
Second, half of the teams on red are poor countries.
Also where in the hell would the fighting be taking place?
You need to re-evaluate your post, sir.
Second, half of the teams on red are poor countries.
Also where in the hell would the fighting be taking place?
You need to re-evaluate your post, sir.
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#7. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 20, 201311Year Member
Posts: 3,585
Reputation Power: 126
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 20, 201311Year Member
Posts: 3,585
Reputation Power: 126
I agree with everyone else, this just wouldn't happen. The teams are all wrong. Maybe fix them? Then we will decide.
- 0useful
- 1not useful
#8. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 01, 201113Year Member
Posts: 8,932
Reputation Power: 415
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 01, 201113Year Member
Posts: 8,932
Reputation Power: 415
No one.
World War 3 would likely lead to a Nuclear war.
World War 3 would likely lead to a Nuclear war.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#9. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 14, 201311Year Member
Posts: 1,708
Reputation Power: 64
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 14, 201311Year Member
Posts: 1,708
Reputation Power: 64
I highly doubt that the will be WW3 because of the UN and NATO and all of these treaties.
But I think China would be neutral. They are allied with N. Korea, but we depend on them (economy wise).
But I think China would be neutral. They are allied with N. Korea, but we depend on them (economy wise).
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#10. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 20, 201311Year Member
Posts: 503
Reputation Power: 19
If this actually happened, the Red I think would look as if they were winning about 30% of the "war". But then, as history shows, their whole governmental infrastructure would eventually collapse, and Blue eventually prevailing .
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.