5FDP wrote Leave the man alone seriously he's innocent always was. I swear if a white teen was shot by him it would have never been looked at.

You don't get it. He shot a man.

var wrote

5FDP wrote Leave the man alone seriously he's innocent always was. I swear if a white teen was shot by him it would have never been looked at.

You don't get it. He shot a man.

He did I get it but it was for self defense he is not a murder he defended him self I think you are the one who doesn't get it.

5FDP wrote

var wrote

5FDP wrote Leave the man alone seriously he's innocent always was. I swear if a white teen was shot by him it would have never been looked at.

You don't get it. He shot a man.

He did I get it but it was for self defense he is not a murder he defended him self I think you are the one who doesn't get it.

So you're telling me...

A guy can stalk and approach someone for no justifiable reason, attack him, and then when he gets attacked back, kill the guy, claim "self defense", and still get away with it? The law is pretty messed up if you can do that and get away with it.

Establish wrote

5FDP wrote

var wrote

5FDP wrote Leave the man alone seriously he's innocent always was. I swear if a white teen was shot by him it would have never been looked at.

You don't get it. He shot a man.

He did I get it but it was for self defense he is not a murder he defended him self I think you are the one who doesn't get it.

So you're telling me...

A guy can stalk and approach someone for no justifiable reason, attack him, and then when he gets attacked back, kill the guy, claim "self defense", and still get away with it? The law is pretty messed up if you can do that and get away with it.

I don't think you have the right information.

Establish wrote

5FDP wrote

var wrote

5FDP wrote Leave the man alone seriously he's innocent always was. I swear if a white teen was shot by him it would have never been looked at.

You don't get it. He shot a man.

He did I get it but it was for self defense he is not a murder he defended him self I think you are the one who doesn't get it.

So you're telling me...

A guy can stalk and approach someone for no justifiable reason, attack him, and then when he gets attacked back, kill the guy, claim "self defense", and still get away with it? The law is pretty messed up if you can do that and get away with it.

Its not illegal to follow someone if they are acting odd. And then trayvon attacks george and and smashed his head into the concrete. Im sure i would shoot someone if they were doing that. The verdict was right, and so is the law.

In all honesty, this should have been over with last year. The media always drags shit out longer than it should be.

This is BS. Not all African Americans are treated this way. The letter implies that all are treated like trash.

SuperControllerz wrote

Establish wrote

5FDP wrote

var wrote

5FDP wrote Leave the man alone seriously he's innocent always was. I swear if a white teen was shot by him it would have never been looked at.

You don't get it. He shot a man.

He did I get it but it was for self defense he is not a murder he defended him self I think you are the one who doesn't get it.

So you're telling me...

A guy can stalk and approach someone for no justifiable reason, attack him, and then when he gets attacked back, kill the guy, claim "self defense", and still get away with it? The law is pretty messed up if you can do that and get away with it.

Its not illegal to follow someone if they are acting odd. And then trayvon attacks george and and smashed his head into the concrete. Im sure i would shoot someone if they were doing that. The verdict was right, and so is the law.

If they are acting "odd"? Trayvon was walking with a pack of Skittles and iced tea. How in the world is that odd? Furthermore, Zimmerman confronted Trayvon, and there is no proof whatsoever that Trayvon attacked Zimmerman first.

SuperControllerz wrote

Establish wrote

5FDP wrote

var wrote

5FDP wrote Leave the man alone seriously he's innocent always was. I swear if a white teen was shot by him it would have never been looked at.

You don't get it. He shot a man.

He did I get it but it was for self defense he is not a murder he defended him self I think you are the one who doesn't get it.

So you're telling me...

A guy can stalk and approach someone for no justifiable reason, attack him, and then when he gets attacked back, kill the guy, claim "self defense", and still get away with it? The law is pretty messed up if you can do that and get away with it.

Its not illegal to follow someone if they are acting odd. And then trayvon attacks george and and smashed his head into the concrete. Im sure i would shoot someone if they were doing that. The verdict was right, and so is the law.

Right. The only people that actually knows what happen one was accused of murder and the other is dead. Zimmerman did have injury's too his head and Trayvon didn't. Prosecution could not prove that it was racist (neither could the FBI) or premeditated so he was found innocent.

5FDP wrote

SuperControllerz wrote

Establish wrote

5FDP wrote

var wrote

5FDP wrote Leave the man alone seriously he's innocent always was. I swear if a white teen was shot by him it would have never been looked at.

You don't get it. He shot a man.

He did I get it but it was for self defense he is not a murder he defended him self I think you are the one who doesn't get it.

So you're telling me...

A guy can stalk and approach someone for no justifiable reason, attack him, and then when he gets attacked back, kill the guy, claim "self defense", and still get away with it? The law is pretty messed up if you can do that and get away with it.

Its not illegal to follow someone if they are acting odd. And then trayvon attacks george and and smashed his head into the concrete. Im sure i would shoot someone if they were doing that. The verdict was right, and so is the law.

Right. The only people that actually knows what happen one was accused of murder and the other is dead. Zimmerman did have injury's too his head and Trayvon didn't. Prosecution could not prove that it was racist (neither could the FBI) or premeditated so he was found innocent.

Because Trayvon was beating him in a fight that Zimmerman started. Also, Zimmerman wasn't accused of murder. He committed murder, and successfully lied and claimed "self-defense". Zimmerman had no justifiable reason to stalk Trayvon, and the police told him not to. He killed a man, and got away with it, which is a failure in the legal system.