You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
Fun fact: USA's 113th congress least productive in history
Posted:

Fun fact: USA's 113th congress least productive in historyPosted:

aNaughtyCuban
  • TTG Contender
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 13, 201014Year Member
Posts: 3,770
Reputation Power: 172
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 13, 201014Year Member
Posts: 3,770
Reputation Power: 172

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

WASHINGTON The current Congress has had just 15 bills signed into law so far, the fewest in recent history.

This is not an insignificant feat. After all, the 112th Congress (2011-2013) was the most unproductive since the 1940s. But even that Congress, by this time in its first year, had 23 bills signed into law.

And the low number cant be blamed on President Barack Obama. Hes vetoed just two pieces of legislation during his time in office, both in 2010.

The Huffington Post compiled the data from GovTrack, which lists laws since 1973. Back then, significantly more legislation made its way into public law. The height was the 94th (1975-1976) and 95th (1977-1978) legislative sessions.

While the 113th Congress has passed a couple of significant pieces of legislation including the reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act and disaster relief for Hurricane Sandy victims the approvals have often been accompanied by intense partisanship not seen in the past, when both VAWA and disaster relief received strong bipartisan support.

Other bills that became law this year, however, have been significantly less weighty awarding a congressional gold medal and a measure regarding commemorative coins.


[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]





For those of you that don't know, the 113th congress is the group of people currently in charge of the United States Government funding, laws, all that good stuff.

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
#2. Posted:
Amp-
  • TTG Addict
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 23, 201311Year Member
Posts: 2,243
Reputation Power: 129
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 23, 201311Year Member
Posts: 2,243
Reputation Power: 129
Why am I not surprised?

We have the worst congress in over 70 years. Awesome.
#3. Posted:
MariahCarey
  • Spooky Poster
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 12, 201212Year Member
Posts: 1,388
Reputation Power: 54
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 12, 201212Year Member
Posts: 1,388
Reputation Power: 54
They get paid too much for doing absolutely nothing. Didn't a recent survey said that about %60 of voters would remove all of congress from power?
#4. Posted:
Halo
  • Retired Staff
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 16, 201113Year Member
Posts: 21,631
Reputation Power: 2360
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 16, 201113Year Member
Posts: 21,631
Reputation Power: 2360
We've kind of noticed, ha. Sucks that it's happening now out of all times..
#5. Posted:
Vex-
  • V5 Launch
Status: Offline
Joined: May 01, 201311Year Member
Posts: 2,530
Reputation Power: 116
Status: Offline
Joined: May 01, 201311Year Member
Posts: 2,530
Reputation Power: 116
GoldReaper300 wrote They get paid too much for doing absolutely nothing. Didn't a recent survey said that about %60 of voters would remove all of congress from power?


If that's the case and this is a democracy then shouldnt it be done?
#6. Posted:
SexyxNinja
  • Challenger
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 04, 201212Year Member
Posts: 174
Reputation Power: 6
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 04, 201212Year Member
Posts: 174
Reputation Power: 6
They get. Paid way to much to do absolutely do nothing!
Jump to:
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.