You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#21. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 14, 201212Year Member
Posts: 1,571
Reputation Power: 170
Status: Offline
Joined: May 14, 201212Year Member
Posts: 1,571
Reputation Power: 170
Zuko wrote They should only have to release banned usernames because there is no point in keeping those locked up.They definitely shouldn't make the inactive users give up their names thoughdo u really want someone who is banned username?
they dont allow you to have a banned users name for a reason. if someone searches that name finds out that that person is a scammer, and someone who causes problems they will think thats you.
also if someone gets banned I can see them joining with the same name causeing more problems till they get banned again. then they will change their ip again and repeat. how far do u want this to go?
get over the fact you csnt takr a name thats already taken... it doesn't really matter.
- 1useful
- 1not useful
#22. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 25, 201212Year Member
Posts: 546
Reputation Power: 22
I agree, they should delete the old accounts...
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#23. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 201311Year Member
Posts: 3,101
Reputation Power: 144
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 201311Year Member
Posts: 3,101
Reputation Power: 144
I do agree with you there but TTG have no right to delete their account, they made it its theirs, they should only open up the perma ban ones.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#24. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 28, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,324
Reputation Power: 49
The TTG staff have enough to deal with, so why make them do extra work just for some accounts. They don't care, it earns them more money.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#25. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 24, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,376
Reputation Power: 190
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 24, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,376
Reputation Power: 190
I was inactive for two years too! Cause I had a life to attend too!
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#26. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 12, 201113Year Member
Posts: 3,979
Reputation Power: 229
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 12, 201113Year Member
Posts: 3,979
Reputation Power: 229
As much as I would want this username: ashley
No matter how long they joined, or no matter how inactive their account is, its still theirs to keep and own, and in which nobody has the right to take it off them.
I mean like, how would you feel if you had one of these inactive accounts, and it got deleted because someone wanted the username and you thought you wanted to use TTG in the future? It's their right to have that account and that comes with the features that account holds.
I would like them to delete the inactive accounts, but its not going to happen.
No matter how long they joined, or no matter how inactive their account is, its still theirs to keep and own, and in which nobody has the right to take it off them.
I mean like, how would you feel if you had one of these inactive accounts, and it got deleted because someone wanted the username and you thought you wanted to use TTG in the future? It's their right to have that account and that comes with the features that account holds.
I would like them to delete the inactive accounts, but its not going to happen.
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#27. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 19, 201014Year Member
Posts: 3,488
Reputation Power: 155
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 19, 201014Year Member
Posts: 3,488
Reputation Power: 155
just be on the loook out for when it becomes available :p gl
- 0useful
- 1not useful
#28. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 14, 201311Year Member
Posts: 275
Reputation Power: 10
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 14, 201311Year Member
Posts: 275
Reputation Power: 10
The staff already said they are not planning to deactivate any old accounts.
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#29. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 01, 201311Year Member
Posts: 2,530
Reputation Power: 116
Status: Offline
Joined: May 01, 201311Year Member
Posts: 2,530
Reputation Power: 116
-Snowflake wroteZuko wrote They should only have to release banned usernames because there is no point in keeping those locked up.They definitely shouldn't make the inactive users give up their names thoughdo u really want someone who is banned username?
they dont allow you to have a banned users name for a reason. if someone searches that name finds out that that person is a scammer, and someone who causes problems they will think thats you.
also if someone gets banned I can see them joining with the same name causeing more problems till they get banned again. then they will change their ip again and repeat. how far do u want this to go?
get over the fact you csnt takr a name thats already taken... it doesn't really matter.
You say "Get over...." as if i'm the one that brought this up and am making a big deal of it.
And yea I don't care if I'm using a username that had a bad reputation in the past... I just want to use that name. Who honestly cares. Well you do I guess and I could care less if you and a few others hate me for it.
I say Free the banned usernames!
- 1useful
- 1not useful
#30. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 22, 201311Year Member
Posts: 1,045
Reputation Power: 54
Yeah it's a shame. There are more OG not being used than there is being used
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.