tbyeah wrote

KarI wrote And the fact they said "No building has ever fallen due to fire" prier 9/11 yet 3 building 3 due to fire.

The Pentagon was apparently hit by a plane yet the hole was to small to fit a boeing in it.

so many more I could name.

It wasn't just fire...

You think the huge forces involved in two large aircraft smashing into a building at full speed are irrelevant?

The man who built it said that they were able to with stand 1-2 hits from aircrafts.

how cares this happen 2001 this is 2013 no one care about 911 anymore

FaZeKid2002 wrote how cares this happen 2001 this is 2013 no one care about 911 anymore

tell that to the family of the victims (Fazefanboy... I mean fazekid2002)

There is 100's of videos about 9/11 conspiracies . There isnt much that could be said that isnt already known.

KarI wrote

tbyeah wrote

KarI wrote And the fact they said "No building has ever fallen due to fire" prier 9/11 yet 3 building 3 due to fire.

The Pentagon was apparently hit by a plane yet the hole was to small to fit a boeing in it.

so many more I could name.

It wasn't just fire...

You think the huge forces involved in two large aircraft smashing into a building at full speed are irrelevant?

The man who built it said that they were able to with stand 1-2 hits from aircrafts.

The aircraft hits and the fires together. That's a lot. Two aircraft of that size caused huge structural damage to the buildings. They weakened the building to a degree where the fire was the final straw.

A lot of people seem to forget that it was two huge planes.
Also if you see the footage the plane takes out supports in the building and the floors above the plane crash down, causing so much force it takes it out floor by floor.

I say there is more to it than planes being hijacked and slammed into buildings. Two planes hit two buildings in New York, but three buildings fell.

The hole left in the Pentagon looks to be too small. Even if there is an explanation, why was it not engulfed in flames from the fuel? It just blew up and smoldered out. I think it should have burned for quite a bit, just as the towers did days after. I also don't understand why there is only one Pentagon tape of what happened there. There are cameras all over that building. It's one of the most protected buildings. There is no way that the convenient store video is the only one that got anything.

Back to the towers: How did passports and IDs of the hijackers survive when the flames were supposedly hot enough to melt the beams? If the tops did collapse, which wouldn't have been that surprising in my opinion, then the other floors should have created resistance. The floors created zero resistance, and they fell in free fall. Building 7 had a vertical gash in the side of the building from debris, but that would mean no main support beams should have been harmed (at least not enough for a collapse. There is no way it fell, especially in a demolition style. I have seen pictures of buildings around the towers. One building was almost cut in half horizontally, but it continued to stand. How if these other buildings could not? I don't understand that.

For the plane that crashed in Pennsylvania there were no pieces of the plane in the crater. It was just an empty crater that you can make with some bombs. Can't believe people fell for that one too.

This conspiracy has been going on forever, on here especially. Every day there's a new thread "9/11 government set up man!!" I'm not trying to be the dick here, but it's getting annoying. Yes a lot of things don't add up, but people making 1000's of threads a day on this gets pretty annoying.

There was definitely explosives. "With a plane that huge it would have caused structure damage" Yeah, it would have fallen a few floors then tipped over. But yet it goes straight down.
Real news is being reported daily @
infowars . com