You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
About quickscoping.
Posted:
About quickscoping.Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 02, 201014Year Member
Posts: 103
Reputation Power: 5
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 02, 201014Year Member
Posts: 103
Reputation Power: 5
I have seen alot of discussion about quickscoping. It seems people would like to remove quickscoping completely, because with soh pro aiming down sniper is too quick. Well... I don't know if they are just idiot or you can't play, but I've been laughing alot for those comments and now I wanted to share my opinion too.
First of all I'm not 11 years old wannabe optic predator, my gb rank is 119,975th (i know thats not very good, but im not playing gb for exp) and I've been playing call of duties everyday for few hours since release of Call of Duty 4. Note: I'm not trying to prove you my awsomeness, just telling few facts that helps you to understand what im saying.
Quicker aiming down doesn't make quickscoping any easier for me. My accuracy and speed are almost same in cod4 and mw2. I guess it really doesnt make any matter if you have soh pro or not, but there have been alot more "quickscopers" on youtube after releasing mw2. For example Optic Predator... there are millions of fanboys learning to quickscope and they usually arent even good. Good quickscoping takes some skills and experience also with soh pro. So I dont know why people think its about soh pro. Maybe people have watched too many quickscope montages and think its very overpowered weapon, because youtube people are getting alot of multikills all the time. Thats because montages are edited and videos dont show deaths of the "quickscope heroes". I usually get alot better stats using assault rifle or smg than intervention or barrett. Maybe its because im better with those weapons and im not good with intervention, but I dont think so. I bet I could beat most of youtube quickscopers in mw2 using famas. Not because im better or my opponent would be bad. Just because famas is better than intervention or barrett for alot of situations in mw2. Range is almost same and with HD TV and steady thumb i can shoot guy from other side of derail or any other big map. Firerate is better and it has 30 bullets in one mag which means 10 burst, so capacity is bigger. Also damage is same, usually one burst one kill. And with famas, you dont even have to ads at close range to get sure shot. So why does anyone think intervention or barrett is overpowered with soh pro? Just learn to play and stop whining.
I would rather remove noobtubes. It doesnt require any skills and you can easily get 2 kills / one death or with one man army alot more. But I dont give a shit if there will or will not be soh pro quickscoping in bo. It would be nice to also hear your opinions, but dont post any "F*** you noob randy wnb optic asshole kid...." comments or ill have to beat you in 1vs1. [there might be some bad english, but try to understand it.)
First of all I'm not 11 years old wannabe optic predator, my gb rank is 119,975th (i know thats not very good, but im not playing gb for exp) and I've been playing call of duties everyday for few hours since release of Call of Duty 4. Note: I'm not trying to prove you my awsomeness, just telling few facts that helps you to understand what im saying.
Quicker aiming down doesn't make quickscoping any easier for me. My accuracy and speed are almost same in cod4 and mw2. I guess it really doesnt make any matter if you have soh pro or not, but there have been alot more "quickscopers" on youtube after releasing mw2. For example Optic Predator... there are millions of fanboys learning to quickscope and they usually arent even good. Good quickscoping takes some skills and experience also with soh pro. So I dont know why people think its about soh pro. Maybe people have watched too many quickscope montages and think its very overpowered weapon, because youtube people are getting alot of multikills all the time. Thats because montages are edited and videos dont show deaths of the "quickscope heroes". I usually get alot better stats using assault rifle or smg than intervention or barrett. Maybe its because im better with those weapons and im not good with intervention, but I dont think so. I bet I could beat most of youtube quickscopers in mw2 using famas. Not because im better or my opponent would be bad. Just because famas is better than intervention or barrett for alot of situations in mw2. Range is almost same and with HD TV and steady thumb i can shoot guy from other side of derail or any other big map. Firerate is better and it has 30 bullets in one mag which means 10 burst, so capacity is bigger. Also damage is same, usually one burst one kill. And with famas, you dont even have to ads at close range to get sure shot. So why does anyone think intervention or barrett is overpowered with soh pro? Just learn to play and stop whining.
I would rather remove noobtubes. It doesnt require any skills and you can easily get 2 kills / one death or with one man army alot more. But I dont give a shit if there will or will not be soh pro quickscoping in bo. It would be nice to also hear your opinions, but dont post any "F*** you noob randy wnb optic asshole kid...." comments or ill have to beat you in 1vs1. [there might be some bad english, but try to understand it.)
The following 1 user thanked Hyp3rArska for this useful post:
KSIxSP33D (10-29-2010)
#2. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 31, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,379
Reputation Power: 53
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 31, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,379
Reputation Power: 53
Gud jub buddy +repped
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#3. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 07, 201014Year Member
Posts: 5,144
Reputation Power: 441
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 07, 201014Year Member
Posts: 5,144
Reputation Power: 441
about noobtubes.
there is not one man army in black ops.
1. Noob tubes only get 2 shots.
2. Noob Tubes go slower than bullets.
3. Noob Tubes have a slower Rate of fire.
4. Close range = no kill unless you direct impact them.
5. Snipers can shoot through walls.
6. Snipers are more accurate.
7. Sleight of hand makes you zoom in WAY too fast.
8. Also, noobtubing is meant to kill campers who camp in buildings, if your camping and die from some guy from a noobtube who you killed 3 times while camping, don't **** about it.
there is not one man army in black ops.
1. Noob tubes only get 2 shots.
2. Noob Tubes go slower than bullets.
3. Noob Tubes have a slower Rate of fire.
4. Close range = no kill unless you direct impact them.
5. Snipers can shoot through walls.
6. Snipers are more accurate.
7. Sleight of hand makes you zoom in WAY too fast.
8. Also, noobtubing is meant to kill campers who camp in buildings, if your camping and die from some guy from a noobtube who you killed 3 times while camping, don't **** about it.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#4. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 02, 201014Year Member
Posts: 103
Reputation Power: 5
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 02, 201014Year Member
Posts: 103
Reputation Power: 5
BuckFutter wrote about noobtubes.
there is not one man army in black ops.
1. Noob tubes only get 2 shots.
2. Noob Tubes go slower than bullets.
3. Noob Tubes have a slower Rate of fire.
4. Close range = no kill unless you direct impact them.
5. Snipers can shoot through walls.
6. Snipers are more accurate.
7. Sleight of hand makes you zoom in WAY too fast.
8. Also, noobtubing is meant to kill campers who camp in buildings, if your camping and die from some guy from a noobtube who you killed 3 times while camping, don't **** about it.
I know, ive seen that before... but with noobtube dont have to get direct impact, so you dont even have to aim to get kills. That makes it easier to use, atleast for me. Those eight facts are defending noobtubes. My opinion is that noobtubes are only good for annoying friends.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.