You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#61. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 06, 201113Year Member
Posts: 12,347
Reputation Power: 632
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 06, 201113Year Member
Posts: 12,347
Reputation Power: 632
Speeding wrote building collapse straight down which can't simply happen from a high speed plane hitting towards the top of a huge building.
Has there ever been tests done to prove this claim?
- 0useful
- 1not useful
#62. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 26, 201311Year Member
Posts: 41
Reputation Power: 2
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 26, 201311Year Member
Posts: 41
Reputation Power: 2
it was all propaganda .9/11 was all planed by the us government
- 1useful
- 3not useful
#63. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 16, 201311Year Member
Posts: 68
Reputation Power: 2
I honestly don't believe it was a terrorist attack.. I mean yeah, it seems legit that terrorists did do it.
But look at all of the evidence of it.
Don't call me a conspiracist for this.. There was an illuminati card trading game made in 1990. There was a card called "terrorist nuke". That card showed 2 buildings identical to the twin towers. Burning. Exploding.
Do you know how much tax money they got out of that? Of course it was planned. Maybe for destruction, or tax money. I just know it wasn't a terrorist attack.
But look at all of the evidence of it.
Don't call me a conspiracist for this.. There was an illuminati card trading game made in 1990. There was a card called "terrorist nuke". That card showed 2 buildings identical to the twin towers. Burning. Exploding.
Do you know how much tax money they got out of that? Of course it was planned. Maybe for destruction, or tax money. I just know it wasn't a terrorist attack.
- 0useful
- 3not useful
#64. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 16, 201311Year Member
Posts: 68
Reputation Power: 2
Lavish wroteA lot of people believe the building had bombs planted inside it on almost every floor. Buildings don't just collapse from a plane hitting it..Speeding wrote building collapse straight down which can't simply happen from a high speed plane hitting towards the top of a huge building.
Has there ever been tests done to prove this claim?
- 0useful
- 2not useful
#65. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 06, 201113Year Member
Posts: 12,347
Reputation Power: 632
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 06, 201113Year Member
Posts: 12,347
Reputation Power: 632
iTypp wroteLavish wroteA lot of people believe the building had bombs planted inside it on almost every floor. Buildings don't just collapse from a plane hitting it..Speeding wrote building collapse straight down which can't simply happen from a high speed plane hitting towards the top of a huge building.
Has there ever been tests done to prove this claim?
Because planes just hit buildings every day to know that for a fact.
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#66. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 11, 200915Year Member
Posts: 2,045
Reputation Power: 424
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 11, 200915Year Member
Posts: 2,045
Reputation Power: 424
iTypp wroteLavish wroteA lot of people believe the building had bombs planted inside it on almost every floor. Buildings don't just collapse from a plane hitting it..Speeding wrote building collapse straight down which can't simply happen from a high speed plane hitting towards the top of a huge building.
Has there ever been tests done to prove this claim?
What I don't understand...is...
Let's say their were bombs on each floor. How can you say it has to be the government who put the bombs when it could have easily been the terrorists? Smh..
I believe 9/11 was terrorists, and I believe they did have bombs planted on each or every other floor, but I don't think "Oh no, the bombs mean the government did it.."
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#67. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 09, 201311Year Member
Posts: 2,222
Reputation Power: 62
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 09, 201311Year Member
Posts: 2,222
Reputation Power: 62
I never knew there were so many architectural engineers on TTG...
- 6useful
- 0not useful
#68. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 19, 201311Year Member
Posts: 497
Reputation Power: 33
Here's a few reasons why I think It was all a set up.
Most of the alleged hijackers are still alive to this day and their names were never removed as the hijackers.
WTC both feel a free fall speed which meant explosives had to been planted there before.
1 building didn't get hit by a plane and fell also at free fall speed.
The plane that hit the pentagon left a hole way to small to a boeing into.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
possibly a drone.
Most of the alleged hijackers are still alive to this day and their names were never removed as the hijackers.
WTC both feel a free fall speed which meant explosives had to been planted there before.
1 building didn't get hit by a plane and fell also at free fall speed.
The plane that hit the pentagon left a hole way to small to a boeing into.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
possibly a drone.
- 3useful
- 1not useful
#69. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 11, 201113Year Member
Posts: 3,334
Reputation Power: 201
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 11, 201113Year Member
Posts: 3,334
Reputation Power: 201
x94 wroteActually laughed when you said free fell. The planes hit mid-building to upper-building. The buildings didn't collapse from the bottom. The lack of support from the hits on the middles of the buildings made the upper parts collapse and with that weight, it just kept going on and on till the ground. It's simple logic. As opposed to all your other "points" (yet to be proven) I can't be asked to even start to go into detail there.Here's a few reasons why I think It was all a set up.
Most of the alleged hijackers are still alive to this day and their names were never removed as the hijackers.
WTC both feel a free fall speed which meant explosives had to been planted there before.
1 building didn't get hit by a plane and fell also at free fall speed.
The plane that hit the pentagon left a hole way to small to a boeing into.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
possibly a drone.
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#70. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 22, 201212Year Member
Posts: 1,073
Reputation Power: 44
Although i should of posted here, i had more proof and info? I don't get why my post got closed.
Forums/t=6089631/9-11-theory-gove...rt=10.html
Forums/t=6089631/9-11-theory-gove...rt=10.html
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.