Brad- wrote

Feels wrote

Brad- wrote

Feels wrote The thing is, is you shouldn't have bought Eto'o (all-be-it on a free). You had Lukaku ready to start. It would have done him the world of good to get Champions League experience. Eto'o has lost a lot of his skill and pace and he's not as good as he used to be. Torres is well, being Torres and Demba Ba is a decent backup striker.

It's the same as Chelsea's attacking midfield situation. Willian, Schurrle, Hazard, De Bruyne, Mata and Oscar are all first team worthy midfielders. None of them are going to like being rotated around all the time. Sure, it's good to have strength in depth but I think you've [Chelsea] have over done it. I reckon a couple of them are going to leave, and I hope for your sake it isn't Mata and Hazard.

Lukaku is still too young and inexperienced to be our #1 Striker, he can do the job at West Brom, but he isn't ready yet to be #1 at Chelsea, competing for the title. It will definitely be better for him to stay on loan out at Everton.

Also, we need that many attacking midfielders, we play with a formation of 3 attacking midfielders and never will all of our top 3 be 100% match fit, once injuries start kicking in and we have mid week games, we will be able to always have a strong side out there competing to win games

I disagree. Lukaku has the attributes to play at top-level football. He just needs that experience, and how do you get it? By playing games. Also, regarding the attacking midfield situation, you don't need that many top AM's. When Jose finds his favourite among the six, the others will be surplus to requirements and forced to be benched until as you say, other players aren't match fit. They're not going to like sitting on the bench.

Exactly, Lukaku is lacking experience. He is too inexperienced to play #1 at Chelsea, it's way too much pressure for the kid. He will play a lot more games at Everton that he would have at Chelsea & he will do much better there.

You think that our top 3 AMs will always be 100% match fit? I can tell you now, that 90% of our games, only 1 of the 3 will be 100% fit. Don't expect any of our top AMs to be on the becnch resting for more than 2 games consecutively

If I remember correctly, Jose Mourinho had an established team at Inter and Real (could be wrong) and he didn't like rotating that often. That'd lead me to suggest that certain players won't play too many games. Sure, they'll end up playing CoC and FA Cup games but, the standard of talent that you have, they should all be playing every game in the Champions League.

Feels wrote

Brad- wrote

Feels wrote

Brad- wrote

Feels wrote The thing is, is you shouldn't have bought Eto'o (all-be-it on a free). You had Lukaku ready to start. It would have done him the world of good to get Champions League experience. Eto'o has lost a lot of his skill and pace and he's not as good as he used to be. Torres is well, being Torres and Demba Ba is a decent backup striker.

It's the same as Chelsea's attacking midfield situation. Willian, Schurrle, Hazard, De Bruyne, Mata and Oscar are all first team worthy midfielders. None of them are going to like being rotated around all the time. Sure, it's good to have strength in depth but I think you've [Chelsea] have over done it. I reckon a couple of them are going to leave, and I hope for your sake it isn't Mata and Hazard.

Lukaku is still too young and inexperienced to be our #1 Striker, he can do the job at West Brom, but he isn't ready yet to be #1 at Chelsea, competing for the title. It will definitely be better for him to stay on loan out at Everton.

Also, we need that many attacking midfielders, we play with a formation of 3 attacking midfielders and never will all of our top 3 be 100% match fit, once injuries start kicking in and we have mid week games, we will be able to always have a strong side out there competing to win games

I disagree. Lukaku has the attributes to play at top-level football. He just needs that experience, and how do you get it? By playing games. Also, regarding the attacking midfield situation, you don't need that many top AM's. When Jose finds his favourite among the six, the others will be surplus to requirements and forced to be benched until as you say, other players aren't match fit. They're not going to like sitting on the bench.

Exactly, Lukaku is lacking experience. He is too inexperienced to play #1 at Chelsea, it's way too much pressure for the kid. He will play a lot more games at Everton that he would have at Chelsea & he will do much better there.

You think that our top 3 AMs will always be 100% match fit? I can tell you now, that 90% of our games, only 1 of the 3 will be 100% fit. Don't expect any of our top AMs to be on the becnch resting for more than 2 games consecutively

If I remember correctly, Jose Mourinho had an established team at Inter and Real (could be wrong) and he didn't like rotating that often. That'd lead me to suggest that certain players won't play too many games. Sure, they'll end up playing CoC and FA Cup games but, the standard of talent that you have, they should all be playing every game in the Champions League.

You remember incorrectly. Mourinho loves to rotate, he always does it, he has done wherever he has gone

Brad- wrote

Feels wrote

Brad- wrote

Feels wrote

Brad- wrote

Feels wrote The thing is, is you shouldn't have bought Eto'o (all-be-it on a free). You had Lukaku ready to start. It would have done him the world of good to get Champions League experience. Eto'o has lost a lot of his skill and pace and he's not as good as he used to be. Torres is well, being Torres and Demba Ba is a decent backup striker.

It's the same as Chelsea's attacking midfield situation. Willian, Schurrle, Hazard, De Bruyne, Mata and Oscar are all first team worthy midfielders. None of them are going to like being rotated around all the time. Sure, it's good to have strength in depth but I think you've [Chelsea] have over done it. I reckon a couple of them are going to leave, and I hope for your sake it isn't Mata and Hazard.

Lukaku is still too young and inexperienced to be our #1 Striker, he can do the job at West Brom, but he isn't ready yet to be #1 at Chelsea, competing for the title. It will definitely be better for him to stay on loan out at Everton.

Also, we need that many attacking midfielders, we play with a formation of 3 attacking midfielders and never will all of our top 3 be 100% match fit, once injuries start kicking in and we have mid week games, we will be able to always have a strong side out there competing to win games

I disagree. Lukaku has the attributes to play at top-level football. He just needs that experience, and how do you get it? By playing games. Also, regarding the attacking midfield situation, you don't need that many top AM's. When Jose finds his favourite among the six, the others will be surplus to requirements and forced to be benched until as you say, other players aren't match fit. They're not going to like sitting on the bench.

Exactly, Lukaku is lacking experience. He is too inexperienced to play #1 at Chelsea, it's way too much pressure for the kid. He will play a lot more games at Everton that he would have at Chelsea & he will do much better there.

You think that our top 3 AMs will always be 100% match fit? I can tell you now, that 90% of our games, only 1 of the 3 will be 100% fit. Don't expect any of our top AMs to be on the becnch resting for more than 2 games consecutively

If I remember correctly, Jose Mourinho had an established team at Inter and Real (could be wrong) and he didn't like rotating that often. That'd lead me to suggest that certain players won't play too many games. Sure, they'll end up playing CoC and FA Cup games but, the standard of talent that you have, they should all be playing every game in the Champions League.

You remember incorrectly. Mourinho loves to rotate, he always does it, he has done wherever he has gone

Ah okay fair enough.
Anyway, I still stand by what I said, I think one or two of your top midfielders will want to leave for wanting to play every game!

Feels wrote

Brad- wrote

Feels wrote

Brad- wrote

Feels wrote

Brad- wrote

Feels wrote The thing is, is you shouldn't have bought Eto'o (all-be-it on a free). You had Lukaku ready to start. It would have done him the world of good to get Champions League experience. Eto'o has lost a lot of his skill and pace and he's not as good as he used to be. Torres is well, being Torres and Demba Ba is a decent backup striker.

It's the same as Chelsea's attacking midfield situation. Willian, Schurrle, Hazard, De Bruyne, Mata and Oscar are all first team worthy midfielders. None of them are going to like being rotated around all the time. Sure, it's good to have strength in depth but I think you've [Chelsea] have over done it. I reckon a couple of them are going to leave, and I hope for your sake it isn't Mata and Hazard.

Lukaku is still too young and inexperienced to be our #1 Striker, he can do the job at West Brom, but he isn't ready yet to be #1 at Chelsea, competing for the title. It will definitely be better for him to stay on loan out at Everton.

Also, we need that many attacking midfielders, we play with a formation of 3 attacking midfielders and never will all of our top 3 be 100% match fit, once injuries start kicking in and we have mid week games, we will be able to always have a strong side out there competing to win games

I disagree. Lukaku has the attributes to play at top-level football. He just needs that experience, and how do you get it? By playing games. Also, regarding the attacking midfield situation, you don't need that many top AM's. When Jose finds his favourite among the six, the others will be surplus to requirements and forced to be benched until as you say, other players aren't match fit. They're not going to like sitting on the bench.

Exactly, Lukaku is lacking experience. He is too inexperienced to play #1 at Chelsea, it's way too much pressure for the kid. He will play a lot more games at Everton that he would have at Chelsea & he will do much better there.

You think that our top 3 AMs will always be 100% match fit? I can tell you now, that 90% of our games, only 1 of the 3 will be 100% fit. Don't expect any of our top AMs to be on the becnch resting for more than 2 games consecutively

If I remember correctly, Jose Mourinho had an established team at Inter and Real (could be wrong) and he didn't like rotating that often. That'd lead me to suggest that certain players won't play too many games. Sure, they'll end up playing CoC and FA Cup games but, the standard of talent that you have, they should all be playing every game in the Champions League.

You remember incorrectly. Mourinho loves to rotate, he always does it, he has done wherever he has gone

Ah okay fair enough.
Anyway, I still stand by what I said, I think one or two of your top midfielders will want to leave for wanting to play every game!

Mourinho made it very clear to all the Chelsea players that we will be running a rotation policy and if they are not comfortable with it, just to leave. Nobody left, so we can assume that all of our players are happy with a rotation policy. It will also increase competition for places in the squad. It's all good!

Chelsea have the perfect balanced squad to win everything, we have a decent shot at it aswell


Don't hate on Torres too much, he did manage to 'skill De Gea' before missing an open goal

He was 50 mil down the drain the second they bought him.

to me, chelsea really didn't need to buy willian. they have too many midfielders already. I think they should of just let him go to tottenham

Torres is a class football player, he will always be a class football player.

His form has dropped due to his injury he had, When he joined Chelsea he came across an injury. Ever since he hasn't been able to pull himself back up

But you can't judge him. Once Class, Always class.

He is one of my favourite players to this day.

Pwn wrote Torres is a class football player, he will always be a class football player.

His form has dropped due to his injury he had, When he joined Chelsea he came across an injury. Ever since he hasn't been able to pull himself back up

But you can't judge him. Once Class, Always class.

He is one of my favourite players to this day.

His form has dropped for two and a half season now? That's not form dude, form is temporary. His confidence, skill and pace has dropped significantly. He isn't class anymore.

Hey brad, I have a secret.


oh, [ Register or Signin to view external links. ] and [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]