I play BO2 but it is terrible. I only play competitive and there is so many hitmarers.

To be fair, BLOPS 1 had good zombies.

Black ops 2 had a nice multiplayer, you could really enjoy it.

-Rinoman wrote Black ops 2 had a nice multiplayer, you could really enjoy it.

The sarcasm is real. It is real...right?

Your immature. Seriously. They would not be making more of them if people did not play them, but since you said Call of Duty World at War ( The best multiplayer game) was sick ill thank the topic.

I have gotten every cod but recently have been doing glitches that have got me reset, never doing those again

iPenny wrote Mw2 sucked. damage was a way too overated with 1-2 shot kills with UMP being the only gun used. (Then stupid trickshotters came and made it worse) and the 7-11-25 killstreak where a way too OP. MW2 = Terrible
Mw3 was just MW2 with the killstreaks reduced, the colour was more dull and weapon sounds were changed.

Black Ops 2 was good.
Lague play, zombies, Killstreaks and guns were mostly balanced and still Treyarch get hate.

The last great game Infinity Ward will ever have made is COD 4...

I don't get why people like balancing, it takes the fun out of finding good guns because they all start to do the same damage but just look and sound different.

i believe call of duty has got a lot to prove this year. i think if they don't get it right i can see a huge minority switching to BF4