Aggie wrote

BulletsModz wrote According to campaign, I doubt there will be a ghosts two.
Worth nothing in my opinion.
The game is called ghosts, why would it make any sense at all to have a ghosts two?

By that logic there should not have been modern warfare 2 and 3.

We are clearly viewing things differently, my point of view is that the game is called ghosts, I don't see why it would make sense to have a second ghosts.
I think it will carry on, but I don't think it will be called ghosts.

BulletsModz wrote

Aggie wrote

BulletsModz wrote According to campaign, I doubt there will be a ghosts two.
Worth nothing in my opinion.
The game is called ghosts, why would it make any sense at all to have a ghosts two?

By that logic there should not have been modern warfare 2 and 3.

We are clearly viewing things differently, my point of view is that the game is called ghosts, I don't see why it would make sense to have a second ghosts.
I think it will carry on, but I don't think it will be called ghosts.

you could say the same for cod4 it was COD4: Modern Warfare on the cover but yet on mw2 no one refers to it as cod5: Modern warfare 2 same for mw3?

Aedy wrote

BulletsModz wrote

Aggie wrote

BulletsModz wrote According to campaign, I doubt there will be a ghosts two.
Worth nothing in my opinion.
The game is called ghosts, why would it make any sense at all to have a ghosts two?

By that logic there should not have been modern warfare 2 and 3.

We are clearly viewing things differently, my point of view is that the game is called ghosts, I don't see why it would make sense to have a second ghosts.
I think it will carry on, but I don't think it will be called ghosts.

you could say the same for cod4 it was COD4: Modern Warfare on the cover but yet on mw2 no one refers to it as cod5: Modern warfare 2 same for mw3?

We really have no way of knowing what they will do.
It could be called anything next time. My opinion is different than yours because I am thinking differently, you may be right, you may be wrong. Nobody knows.
It's still a pretty clean tag either way.

everyone saying there wont be a ghosts two clearly havnt played the campaign

BulletsModz wrote

Aedy wrote

BulletsModz wrote

Aggie wrote

BulletsModz wrote According to campaign, I doubt there will be a ghosts two.
Worth nothing in my opinion.
The game is called ghosts, why would it make any sense at all to have a ghosts two?

By that logic there should not have been modern warfare 2 and 3.

We are clearly viewing things differently, my point of view is that the game is called ghosts, I don't see why it would make sense to have a second ghosts.
I think it will carry on, but I don't think it will be called ghosts.

you could say the same for cod4 it was COD4: Modern Warfare on the cover but yet on mw2 no one refers to it as cod5: Modern warfare 2 same for mw3?

We really have no way of knowing what they will do.
It could be called anything next time. My opinion is different than yours because I am thinking differently, you may be right, you may be wrong. Nobody knows.
It's still a pretty clean tag either way.

Thanks dude and true good point.

This will be hilarious if theres not a ghosts 2. Which i doubt lol

They will go all the way up to Ghosts 3 probably. That's CoD for ya.

I think there'll be a two. If you guys played the campaign, you would think so!