You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#21. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 12, 201212Year Member
Posts: 3,639
Reputation Power: 108
There's really no reason to go back, we never found anything interesting in the moon, plus it's extremely expensive. I think we would rather invest the money to send humans to mars because we've never been to mars.
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#22. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 16, 201311Year Member
Posts: 1,964
Reputation Power: 184
Lavish wrote You can see the moon with extreme detail with a telescope.
If they saw something on the moon, they couldn't exactly "hide it".
you ruin the fun in the conspiracy forum.
- 0useful
- 1not useful
#23. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 28, 201410Year Member
Posts: 2,512
Reputation Power: 722
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 28, 201410Year Member
Posts: 2,512
Reputation Power: 722
I'm almost certain that it's the cost, we talk about this in school quite often and that's what our teachers say.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#24. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 06, 201212Year Member
Posts: 6,360
Reputation Power: 374
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 06, 201212Year Member
Posts: 6,360
Reputation Power: 374
CoraI wroteLavish wrote You can see the moon with extreme detail with a telescope.
If they saw something on the moon, they couldn't exactly "hide it".
you ruin the fun in the conspiracy forum.
Some would argue that the easy to respond to posts ruin all the fun in the conspiracy forum.
Not often enough when someone comes along and really blows your mind.
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#25. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 01, 201311Year Member
Posts: 596
Reputation Power: 32
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 01, 201311Year Member
Posts: 596
Reputation Power: 32
This crazy to even think about haha, maybe something did happen up there!
- 0useful
- 1not useful
#26. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 23, 201410Year Member
Posts: 8
Reputation Power: 0
Its not exactly cheap to go up there
Easyjet isn't going to take you
Easyjet isn't going to take you
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#27. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 29, 201113Year Member
Posts: 949
Reputation Power: 45
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 29, 201113Year Member
Posts: 949
Reputation Power: 45
Costs too much money to send someone to the moon
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#28. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 29, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,649
Reputation Power: 65
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 29, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,649
Reputation Power: 65
Doh wrote Probably because it costs quite a lot of money to get up their and back. There isn't always a reason, maybe they built something up there
Money isn't an issue with our 16t debt. Thanks Osama
- 1useful
- 1not useful
#29. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 09, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,369
Reputation Power: 58
Like what other users have said, there's no point spending billions traveling to a place we've already visited multiple times. The moon is just a big rock with craters. Nothing special. It's better we spend the money on space exploration. It's time for the next human achievement; travel to Mars. We need to be able to travel farther than our own moon if we want to travel to other planets that are capable of sustaining life. If we can prove the existence of aliens, just think of the possibilities. So instead of spending billions on learning more about a dusty rock, we can learn about an planet that is possible in sustaining life.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#30. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 18, 200915Year Member
Posts: 3,907
Reputation Power: 342
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 18, 200915Year Member
Posts: 3,907
Reputation Power: 342
We've learned what we can about that large rock circling the earth and moving on.
If for whatever reason they feel the need to spend a few more billion dollars to go back to that rock in space we've already been to i'm sure they would.
I think NASA has harvested the information they need from it and have moved on to other endeavors, like a trip to Mars for example. Theres just no point in spending the money to send someone back there to find out information we already know.
We need to move forward with the space program, not back.
If for whatever reason they feel the need to spend a few more billion dollars to go back to that rock in space we've already been to i'm sure they would.
I think NASA has harvested the information they need from it and have moved on to other endeavors, like a trip to Mars for example. Theres just no point in spending the money to send someone back there to find out information we already know.
We need to move forward with the space program, not back.
- 1useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.