You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#11. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 24, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,610
Reputation Power: 82
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 24, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,610
Reputation Power: 82
TTU wroteReach for the stars, my friend. Haswell on 4.8GHz, perhaps on a fully built loop with at the very least a 240 rad.r00t wrote No overclock within reason will noticeably shorten the life of your CPU and nobody knows how your CPU can overclock. The CPU will be old and useless before it ever comes close to failing, but over the years, it may not handle overclocks as well as it was when it was new. Make sure you're doing it right, though. This guide is simple enough and applies to 1150 as well as 1155.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Thank you! I went from a 4.2 GHz overclock to a 4.0 due to core temps, but when I get a better cooling system, I can happily reach a 4.8!
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#12. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 30, 201311Year Member
Posts: 1,203
Reputation Power: 48
MichaelBay wroteTTU wroteReach for the stars, my friend. Haswell on 4.8GHz, perhaps on a fully built loop with at the very least a 240 rad.r00t wrote No overclock within reason will noticeably shorten the life of your CPU and nobody knows how your CPU can overclock. The CPU will be old and useless before it ever comes close to failing, but over the years, it may not handle overclocks as well as it was when it was new. Make sure you're doing it right, though. This guide is simple enough and applies to 1150 as well as 1155.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Thank you! I went from a 4.2 GHz overclock to a 4.0 due to core temps, but when I get a better cooling system, I can happily reach a 4.8!
r00t had done i5 3570k with 4.8 on air. So the fully built loop isnt really necessary as both of them cpu's run very similar temps.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#13. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 19, 201113Year Member
Posts: 7,422
Reputation Power: 8670
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 19, 201113Year Member
Posts: 7,422
Reputation Power: 8670
LN2 wroteMichaelBay wroteTTU wroteReach for the stars, my friend. Haswell on 4.8GHz, perhaps on a fully built loop with at the very least a 240 rad.r00t wrote No overclock within reason will noticeably shorten the life of your CPU and nobody knows how your CPU can overclock. The CPU will be old and useless before it ever comes close to failing, but over the years, it may not handle overclocks as well as it was when it was new. Make sure you're doing it right, though. This guide is simple enough and applies to 1150 as well as 1155.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Thank you! I went from a 4.2 GHz overclock to a 4.0 due to core temps, but when I get a better cooling system, I can happily reach a 4.8!
r00t had done i5 3570k with 4.8 on air. So the fully built loop isnt really necessary as both of them cpu's run very similar temps.
You forget he did that on ivy bridge which overclocks quite a bit better than haswell.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.