Zero_Point_Five wrote It sounds kind of harsh what I am about to say and will probably will get me "hate" but as you have said, the world is over populated and they are letting people die... but this NEEDS to happen. The earth is very finite in its resources and they are running out rapidly... we need to reduce the amount of people needing and using resources one way or another... Overall it is kind of like (although influenced by our behaviors) natural selection taking place.

Because of this, if there ever is (or already is) a cure for EVERYTHING I personally do not think it should be released or even used.

prepared for the hate comments

Click to View Content

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

To be honest i have to agree, i believe its very ture that the government would do such a thing.... and this is coming from a person that works for the government.

Why would the government hold back on a cure for diseases when they would earn billions out of selling it, they don't earn money from scientists who research so all though your theory is kind of interesting it is wrong, the government care way to much about money to hold back on something like this and also if they had it and they released it they would have more chance of being re elected as that is a huge thing, long story short the government are too greedy to ignore the billions they would earn and the way politics work they would release it for the next elections.


Rant over

Paws wrote Why would the government hold back on a cure for diseases when they would earn billions out of selling it, they don't earn money from scientists who research so all though your theory is kind of interesting it is wrong, the government care way to much about money to hold back on something like this and also if they had it and they released it they would have more chance of being re elected as that is a huge thing, long story short the government are too greedy to ignore the billions they would earn and the way politics work they would release it for the next elections.


Rant over

I agree they would release it to win the elections but, you are wrong in the making money part... First of all, the government wouldn't have control of the cure, the scientists who were granted the money would, and second, since the government didn't make the cure, it would be sold by a private corporation, not them

Paws wrote Why would the government hold back on a cure for diseases when they would earn billions out of selling it, they don't earn money from scientists who research so all though your theory is kind of interesting it is wrong, the government care way to much about money to hold back on something like this and also if they had it and they released it they would have more chance of being re elected as that is a huge thing, long story short the government are too greedy to ignore the billions they would earn and the way politics work they would release it for the next elections.


Rant over

They actually make a lot more by not releasing it. Millions of people buy pills everyday so if they release a cure it'll sell out quickly and they'll stop making money the next day. So your theory is invalid of them making billions off a cure. They'd actually lose money in the end.

I stopped reading after you said

i haven't found any solid evidence to back this up.

Miss wrote it'll sell out quickly and they'll stop making money the next day

Just because something sells out, doesn't mean people stop buying.
There is a thing called 'back order' and it works wonders.

So no, the theory is not invalid.

I Would like to take this time to say thank you for all your feedback on this theory, yeah most of you could be right about the government giving money to scientists to find the cure. But they also have to pay out all money for benefits for dole dossers etc. They need a way to make that money back to keep funding people like that. Okay they may make billions of pounds/dollars from selling the cure. But that money wont be a continuous income from people paying from charities. And therefore once they have received that lump sum of money, they would identify that the world is becoming over populated anyways. This could cause other natural disasters to happen, and even wars to start. Just so that they can have more people killed and lower the population down. I know it sounds sick, but im thinking logically.

i never understand why people dont like war. without war there will be a lot less deaths and the would will overpopulate too fast. disease will become basically immune to our vaccenes and we would run out of resources too fast to make more

If there was a cure for cancer, it would have been leaked, not just the governments scientists can discover it. There are universities and colleges and other countries which wouldn't be in on it.

Said wrote But that money wont be a continuous income from people paying from charities.

Non-Profit charities have a tax exemption so I don't know why you think the government is getting a piece of that pie.