iMitch wrote Yep, pretty sure no one on this thread has any decent football knowledge. You CANNOT compare Hazard to Navas, however you look at it. It's like comparing Lampard to Gerrard or even comparing Sturridge to Handanovic. Handanovic is two ratings higher to Sturridges UP card, so does that mean Handanovic is better than Sturridge?
Check. Mate.
-iMitch

Well obviously not you've just ruined your argument completely who compares a keeper to a striker? You can easily compare wingers same way you can compare midfielders i.e Frank and Gerrard, there has been this argument for years whose the better player and the comparison never gets answered as they both do vital things for their teams. So by comparing Hazard to Navas is pretty damn fair seeing as in FIFA 13 at the end he was a RM. Who knows what future cards he's going to get.

iMitch wrote Yep, pretty sure no one on this thread has any decent football knowledge. You CANNOT compare Hazard to Navas, however you look at it. It's like comparing Lampard to Gerrard or even comparing Sturridge to Handanovic. Handanovic is two ratings higher to Sturridges UP card, so does that mean Handanovic is better than Sturridge?
Check. Mate.
-iMitch

No I think it is you that has no footballing knowledge. Of course you can compare two wingers that play in the same league, sure they may have differences but of course you can compare them. Look at the raw quality of the player Hazard is better than Navas, fact. Sure Navas may be more assist oriented but look at Hazard he can break down defence with ease and is always a threat on the ball, he is a better shot than Navas without a doubt. Also Hazard can play the assisting role brilliantly for example against Fulham the other day. Hazard can do more and is better than Navas. Also Hazard can bring the whole Chelsea team up, if Hazard plays well so do Chelsea (his occasional inconsistency not withstanding).

Are you honestly saying you can't compare Navas and Hazard because you can clearly and I just did. Just because you type in bold and think you know more than everyone else doesn't mean you are right. CHECKMATE.

(Also here is an article comparing the two players, is this wrong as well?)

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Here are some quotes from the aforementioned article in case you were interested:

"When it comes to picking which player is the better footballer and has the bigger potential to be a match-winner, the answer is simple: Eden Hazard."

"Navas, on the other hand, has consistency to his game but is not at the same level in terms of talent as his Belgian opposite number."

"For all his strengths, Navas cannot compete in that regard and, thus, it can only be concluded that Hazard is the better player of the duo and by some distance."

Source: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]