ALL I CAN SAY IS BOOBS :p

#20words

I really like this piece.. it's stunning. The lighting and shading is excellent, and the detail is impressive on the two flowers and her hair.

Her figure looks realistic, although i'm not too sure about her feet. They seem a little deep at the heel - it makes them look a tad too chunky. If there's anything to improve it would be that. However, I don't have much experience in this art style so I could be wrong. That's just how I see it.

Good work. Best of luck in the graphics contest. :bigups:

Pin wrote I really like this piece.. it's stunning. The lighting and shading is excellent, and the detail is impressive on the two flowers and her hair.

Her figure looks realistic, although i'm not too sure about her feet. They seem a little deep at the heel - it makes them look a tad too chunky. If there's anything to improve it would be that. However, I don't have much experience in this art style so I could be wrong. That's just how I see it.

Good work. Best of luck in the graphics contest. :bigups:

They did look odd to me as well but I couldn't tell why.
It can be hard to see sometimes, when you make it, you know?

Thank you for the feedback.

Wow very nice illustration man, I've only just started and I hope on day I could produce them like this, I'd appreciate if you could give me some tips for future times? PM me maybe?

This is so impressive. Makes me wish I had a pen tablet and could draw! I'm so jealous. Also, I hope you win the graphics contest!

Not a bad piece of work (And thats a compliment from me)

Good Points:
> Figure is well done, good proportions, and i love the hair.
> I like the background, while it is blurred, you can see there is still detail in there. Maybe change the amount of blur on areas closer to the front, will give it a bit more depth.
> The colours you used are very well picked, nothing to contrasting, and just enough to draw your eyes where you want them to look.

Criticisms:
> Shadows need to be improved in areas, specifically uder the hair, but also where the hand is on the log, as it is atm it seems almost on top of the picture as oppose to on the log, just needs a little more shadow work before it looks like it belongs there.
> The proportion of the breasts seems a little off, not a lot, just enough to look a fraction abnormal.
> The hands and feet need work, but considering they are difficult things to draw you have done a good job.
>Finally, tweak the shape of one of the roses not just the colours, it will hide the fact that it is just a duplication

My criticism is merely constructive: all in all, its a nice composition

-wilkes-

-Wilkes- wrote Not a bad piece of work (And thats a compliment from me)

Good Points:
> Figure is well done, good proportions, and i love the hair.
> I like the background, while it is blurred, you can see there is still detail in there. Maybe change the amount of blur on areas closer to the front, will give it a bit more depth.
> The colours you used are very well picked, nothing to contrasting, and just enough to draw your eyes where you want them to look.

Criticisms:
> Shadows need to be improved in areas, specifically uder the hair, but also where the hand is on the log, as it is atm it seems almost on top of the picture as oppose to on the log, just needs a little more shadow work before it looks like it belongs there.
> The proportion of the breasts seems a little off, not a lot, just enough to look a fraction abnormal.
> The hands and feet need work, but considering they are difficult things to draw you have done a good job.
>Finally, tweak the shape of one of the roses not just the colours, it will hide the fact that it is just a duplication

My criticism is merely constructive: all in all, its a nice composition

-wilkes-

Thank you very much, for all that. It is very appreciated.
I will definitely take it all into consideration for my next one.
Unfortunately, I'm too lazy to go back and fix everything, after I've already uploaded and posted it, haha.

---

@AR-15 I don't use a drawing tablet.

Good job on this one Fine details on the roses.

Illustrated wrote

-Wilkes- wrote Not a bad piece of work (And thats a compliment from me)

Good Points:
> Figure is well done, good proportions, and i love the hair.
> I like the background, while it is blurred, you can see there is still detail in there. Maybe change the amount of blur on areas closer to the front, will give it a bit more depth.
> The colours you used are very well picked, nothing to contrasting, and just enough to draw your eyes where you want them to look.

Criticisms:
> Shadows need to be improved in areas, specifically uder the hair, but also where the hand is on the log, as it is atm it seems almost on top of the picture as oppose to on the log, just needs a little more shadow work before it looks like it belongs there.
> The proportion of the breasts seems a little off, not a lot, just enough to look a fraction abnormal.
> The hands and feet need work, but considering they are difficult things to draw you have done a good job.
>Finally, tweak the shape of one of the roses not just the colours, it will hide the fact that it is just a duplication

My criticism is merely constructive: all in all, its a nice composition

-wilkes-

Thank you very much, for all that. It is very appreciated.
I will definitely take it all into consideration for my next one.
Unfortunately, I'm too lazy to go back and fix everything, after I've already uploaded and posted it, haha.

---

@AR-15 I don't use a drawing tablet.

No trouble bro, when i used to post my work on here was always nice to get some good feedback
And haha didnt expect you to redo it, with exceptions: i think you should always leave a finished piece alone and use the criticism to make a better piece next time

-wilkes-