Saw it on reddit already. I can appreciate his choice of not killing innocent people regardless.

Thats cool maybe its true !

naruck23 wrote

Scizor wrote so a possible 300 dead civilians was not worth it at the time.

300 Civilians would NEVER be worth at any time, sure 9/11 was a horrible incident and many lives were lost but even then 300 INNOCENT civilians would never be worth anything, they are innocent and deserve to live.
I am sure many disagree but I am glad clinton had some honor/respect.

Okay.. Then the same could be said about our 3,000+ we lost.. They were innocent and deserved to live as well.

Who knows? If Clinton did kill Bin Laden, would 9/11 have happened?

Crazy_Horse_RDR wrote Good on him, his choice saved 300 innocent
Peoples lives, but it's a pity, what happened to the twin tower's and the people inside of it.

Well I guess he kinda caused the deaths of what, 3 thousand innocent lives?

i saw this on yahoo was to lazy to post about it lol thank you for someone who actually posted it though!

For all those saying he is bad because he ended up causing the deaths of 3000 innocent people, what would you have done in his situation?

If he didn't know about 9/11 (conspiracies and junk) and didn't know that all that was going to happen, why would he kill Bin Laden and the innocent people. He would be labeled just as bad as Bin Laden.

He was sorta in a lose lose situation. It was a tough decision to make on his part, hell it would have been a hard decision for anyone to make.

You see this is going to lead to other conspiracy's out there. At the end of the day, he was right. He would have been no better than Osama himself.

Destroying a village with innocent children would have been just as disgusting as the 911. No one deserved to die, so no more innocent blood was spilled.

To be honest, if he did kill him before 911 imagine what it would be like right now?