You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
Isis "Terrorist" Organization
Posted:
Isis "Terrorist" OrganizationPosted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 19, 201014Year Member
Posts: 3,605
Reputation Power: 153
Has anyone read any recent news about the Isis, and The Jame Foley Wight beheading, second captured US civilian is being threaten to be beheaded also. The jihadist in the video speaks with a British accent, this is for retaliation of the bomb dropped on civilians and casualties. Post your opinion or how you feel about the Isis organization below. Do not ask me for the link to the beheading if you really wish to see it there's a thing called google, I will not send the link out through and pms and such.
I feel this may start another war between US,Iraq, and apparently the british are even stepping in, seeing as this is a site from the UK and most people are from around that area I suspect you guys might have more news on it than I being from Canada.
Links to articles
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
I feel this may start another war between US,Iraq, and apparently the british are even stepping in, seeing as this is a site from the UK and most people are from around that area I suspect you guys might have more news on it than I being from Canada.
Links to articles
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
#2. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 12, 201113Year Member
Posts: 11,617
Reputation Power: 654
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 12, 201113Year Member
Posts: 11,617
Reputation Power: 654
Both the US and UK need to leave that area alone.
The ISIS would not exist if we never went there.
The ISIS would not exist if we never went there.
- 1useful
- 2not useful
#3. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 19, 201014Year Member
Posts: 3,605
Reputation Power: 153
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 19, 201014Year Member
Posts: 3,605
Reputation Power: 153
Miss wrote Both the US and UK need to leave that area alone.
The ISIS would not exist if we never went there.
^ This is probably the best way to end the non existing war.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#4. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 31, 201013Year Member
Posts: 1,255
Reputation Power: 41
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 31, 201013Year Member
Posts: 1,255
Reputation Power: 41
Miss wrote Both the US and UK need to leave that area alone.
The ISIS would not exist if we never went there.
Comments as stupid on the from s they are on news posts.
ISIS/IS may be a product of western intervention, however it's only because we displaced them from government.
If you agree with the genocide of people because of there beliefs, that's fine. We're powerful nations we have a responsibility to help in these kinds of situations.
- 4useful
- 0not useful
#5. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 19, 201014Year Member
Posts: 3,605
Reputation Power: 153
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 19, 201014Year Member
Posts: 3,605
Reputation Power: 153
Linear wroteMiss wrote Both the US and UK need to leave that area alone.
The ISIS would not exist if we never went there.
Comments as stupid on the from s they are on news posts.
ISIS/IS may be a product of western intervention, however it's only because we displaced them from government.
If you agree with the genocide of people because of there beliefs, that's fine. We're powerful nations we have a responsibility to help in these kinds of situations.
The responsibility for the powerful nations isn't to go in and wipe out all civilians just because there was a group of "terrorists" in the area. If they really wanted to help they could approach it with a more fitting manner than going with air drops and such.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#6. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 31, 201013Year Member
Posts: 1,255
Reputation Power: 41
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 31, 201013Year Member
Posts: 1,255
Reputation Power: 41
Haku wroteLinear wroteMiss wrote Both the US and UK need to leave that area alone.
The ISIS would not exist if we never went there.
Comments as stupid on the from s they are on news posts.
ISIS/IS may be a product of western intervention, however it's only because we displaced them from government.
If you agree with the genocide of people because of there beliefs, that's fine. We're powerful nations we have a responsibility to help in these kinds of situations.
The responsibility for the powerful nations isn't to go in and wipe out all civilians just because there was a group of "terrorists" in the area. If they really wanted to help they could approach it with a more fitting manner than going with air drops and such.
What civilians are we killing?
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#7. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 31, 201013Year Member
Posts: 1,255
Reputation Power: 41
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 31, 201013Year Member
Posts: 1,255
Reputation Power: 41
Also, why did you write "terrorists", do you seriously question the fact that IS is a terrorist organization?
Air drops are bad? Yeah, those awful things dropping water kits and housing...****.
If you meant dropping bombs, well, i'd rather we spent a small amount of our GDP killing terrorists than giving idiots benefits in the UK s they spend it on drugs.
Air drops are bad? Yeah, those awful things dropping water kits and housing...****.
If you meant dropping bombs, well, i'd rather we spent a small amount of our GDP killing terrorists than giving idiots benefits in the UK s they spend it on drugs.
- 0useful
- 1not useful
#8. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 19, 201014Year Member
Posts: 3,605
Reputation Power: 153
Linear wroteHaku wroteLinear wroteMiss wrote Both the US and UK need to leave that area alone.
The ISIS would not exist if we never went there.
Comments as stupid on the from s they are on news posts.
ISIS/IS may be a product of western intervention, however it's only because we displaced them from government.
If you agree with the genocide of people because of there beliefs, that's fine. We're powerful nations we have a responsibility to help in these kinds of situations.
The responsibility for the powerful nations isn't to go in and wipe out all civilians just because there was a group of "terrorists" in the area. If they really wanted to help they could approach it with a more fitting manner than going with air drops and such.
What civilians are we killing?
There are bombs being dropped on villages and towns with civillians in them, if UK and USA really wanted to do something put foot soldiers in risk it to actually disrupt the isis and save civillians from getting hurt in bombings, towns and peoples homes and lives are getting destroyed over it.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#9. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 31, 201013Year Member
Posts: 1,255
Reputation Power: 41
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 31, 201013Year Member
Posts: 1,255
Reputation Power: 41
Where's your proof the air raids have hit civilians?
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#10. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 19, 201014Year Member
Posts: 3,605
Reputation Power: 153
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 19, 201014Year Member
Posts: 3,605
Reputation Power: 153
Linear wrote Where's your proof the air raids have hit civilians?
I put "Terrorist" because we're the ones invading they're the ones defending not with the isis i know but the isis wants control of their own country and no to be controlled by the US for oil they want their independence and freedom, but I'll get into this when i get back tomorrow.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.