I'd stay away from the "GFX" logo's, there is nothing unique about the logos, just some 3D text, with flares and 1000's of overlays.

I'd follow the 2D route, to create simple logo's.

I dont like it.

But like you said your new to it.

Seems like it's just a text template and a ton of flares and space textures. Way too much going. 0/10.

Hoop wrote I'd stay away from the "GFX" logo's, there is nothing unique about the logos, just some 3D text, with flares and 1000's of overlays.

I'd follow the 2D route, to create simple logo's.

But would simple look good, it just simple ya know? I like abstract and unique things but really clean and smooth are nice also

I don't like it. It's just an overused type of GFX.

I don't want to sound biased but I like images such as my avatar, simple and clean.

But something simple and clean anybody can do, you know what i mean?

Zykai wrote But something simple and clean anybody can do, you know what i mean?

No they cant actually.

And you claimed to like Abstract and Unique, yet you created generic and overdone.

If Clean and Simple is easy...do it....effectively

Zykai wrote But something simple and clean anybody can do, you know what i mean?

But any person that has the ability to watch a YouTube tutorial can do what you have done. So in that sense the point you made counts for your GFX just as much as the clean and simple stuff. And of course anyone with half a brain could do what I have done for my avatar, hence the word "simple".

I don't want to start an argument or anything. I just commented like you asked people to in your post.

Asymmetrical wrote

Zykai wrote But something simple and clean anybody can do, you know what i mean?

No they cant actually.

And you claimed to like Abstract and Unique, yet you created generic and overdone.

If Clean and Simple is easy...do it....effectively

I never claimed to be anything i stated in the whole topic that i am NEW so i don't know where you got that from