TL:DR

Doesnt like change


---------------------------

Your argument being on IW or Treyarch baffles me when we are with Sledgehammer right now, and they have done a fantastic job of switching it up to bring it back from the damage Ghosts did.

I now play with people who admit they called it wrong on this one and are actually enjoying the new style of play and the challenge of movement and line of sight.

Lets give them more than 2 weeks before we call for their heads

I was totally against the futuristic setting Sledgehammer placed Advanced Warfare in when they first announced it. Now, I find that game pretty awesome. All I know is that I don't think I want to ever touch another WW2 game. Not a fan of old technology.

I like quick-scoping. I don't like how easy it seems to be in Advanced Warfare, but I still enjoy it being able to be done. Treyarch ruined the snipers in my opinion (at least with the first Black Ops.)

I loved Infinity Ward's Call of Duty's until Ghosts. I disliked Teryarch's until Black Ops 2. I am digging what Sledgehammer has done so far with help on MW3 and creating AW.

-African wrote The new CoD is by Seldgehammer alone. It seems to have amazing reviews and amazing gameplay. Treyarch listens to the fans. Infinity Ward does their own thing. I think Infinity Ward is done making CoDs, at least for awhile.

Amazing reviews? IGN be like its CoD 10/10..

Don't get me wrong it's something different but CoDs been going downhill.

Narcissistic wrote

-African wrote The new CoD is by Seldgehammer alone. It seems to have amazing reviews and amazing gameplay. Treyarch listens to the fans. Infinity Ward does their own thing. I think Infinity Ward is done making CoDs, at least for awhile.

Amazing reviews? IGN be like its CoD 10/10..

Don't get me wrong it's something different but CoDs been going downhill.

I don't look at IGN. Reviews from the community. Everyone I ask about the game loves it. Reviews on TTG are all good reviews.

Asymmetrical wrote TL:DR

Doesnt like change


---------------------------

Your argument being on IW or Treyarch baffles me when we are with Sledgehammer right now, and they have done a fantastic job of switching it up to bring it back from the damage Ghosts did.

I now play with people who admit they called it wrong on this one and are actually enjoying the new style of play and the challenge of movement and line of sight.

Lets give them more than 2 weeks before we call for their heads

Once again. I am not talking about sledgehammer in anyway. I'm talking about IW and Treyarch, and as far as I know Sledgehammer are doing alright but i'd give it a few more months and people will be moaning about how its suddenly "shit" as per usual, which is part of the reason of why im waiting to see if its worth buying.

Smithzer980 wrote

Asymmetrical wrote TL:DR

Doesnt like change


---------------------------

Your argument being on IW or Treyarch baffles me when we are with Sledgehammer right now, and they have done a fantastic job of switching it up to bring it back from the damage Ghosts did.

I now play with people who admit they called it wrong on this one and are actually enjoying the new style of play and the challenge of movement and line of sight.

Lets give them more than 2 weeks before we call for their heads

Once again. I am not talking about sledgehammer in anyway. I'm talking about IW and Treyarch, and as far as I know Sledgehammer are doing alright but i'd give it a few more months and people will be moaning about how its suddenly "****" as per usual, which is part of the reason of why im waiting to see if its worth buying.

How can someone elses review say whether YOU will enjoy it?

If you go through life believing what others want you to believe its gonna be a bad life.

You should be talking about SH because its their game, not IW and Treyarch.
Talk about them in the next 2 years.


As for waiting ---

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]