You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#11. Posted:
Red
  • Blind Gifter
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 08, 201410Year Member
Posts: 2,019
Reputation Power: 5372
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 08, 201410Year Member
Posts: 2,019
Reputation Power: 5372
What the hell did I just read.... Very mathematical.
#12. Posted:
Imao
  • Rising Star
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 13, 201410Year Member
Posts: 718
Reputation Power: 33
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 13, 201410Year Member
Posts: 718
Reputation Power: 33
What the fck? I'm actually brain **** with this post!
#13. Posted:
Golem-
  • Powerhouse
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 02, 201311Year Member
Posts: 426
Reputation Power: 21
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 02, 201311Year Member
Posts: 426
Reputation Power: 21
So your saying that with a number this large matter could be created?
#14. Posted:
Cuhrismuh
  • Prospect
Status: Offline
Joined: May 21, 201113Year Member
Posts: 643
Reputation Power: 38
Status: Offline
Joined: May 21, 201113Year Member
Posts: 643
Reputation Power: 38
i followed this for the most part and then saw the g to 64 and was like waaaaa
interesting post man! liked it
#15. Posted:
Kramoris
  • New Member
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 18, 201410Year Member
Posts: 20
Reputation Power: 0
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 18, 201410Year Member
Posts: 20
Reputation Power: 0
Golem- wrote
So your saying that with a number this large matter could be created?


What I'm saying is your brain weighs more (nearly untraceable) if you have more information in it. If you are talking hard drives, they also weigh more if they have more memory on them. (also untraceable). Also, what I said about being able to remember/know/store the number is rather hypothetical considering you couldn't the store the number anywhere (in our observable universe) in the first place, considering you would be gaining knowledge faster than the universe could expand.
Jump to:
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.