You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#41. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 19, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,148
Reputation Power: 52
xBoSS_Liive wrote i just buy AppNET and when I click call of duty advanced warfare it won't open!!stupid idea,most of the the stuff you can get for free
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#42. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 19, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,148
Reputation Power: 52
bch4mp wrote"the shit I make out to be" let's get this straight, you paid $35 for a tool that has free tools all kept together in one window. If you knew your way around Forums and could search for tools then you would agree with me. And also, what I said "isn't shit I made it out to be" it's what my experience was and there was a big post like this a while back and it was full of people saying the same things. The only reason your backing it up is because you aren't actually seeing what the developers are doing. Copying and pasting code pretty muchAxG wrotebch4mp wrote Go with AppNet. Never had any issues with the it myself. I use it quite a bit, mostly for their spoofer, which is amazing, and everything works in the tool.
probably xxModdedWarexx little brother
lol no. I have almost no problems with the tool. Not saying it's the best tool in the world. No, but it's not the shit you make it out to be.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#43. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 14, 201410Year Member
Posts: 1,370
Reputation Power: 115
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 14, 201410Year Member
Posts: 1,370
Reputation Power: 115
AxG wrotebch4mp wrote"the shit I make out to be" let's get this straight, you paid $35 for a tool that has free tools all kept together in one window. If you knew your way around Forums and could search for tools then you would agree with me. And also, what I said "isn't shit I made it out to be" it's what my experience was and there was a big post like this a while back and it was full of people saying the same things. The only reason your backing it up is because you aren't actually seeing what the developers are doing. Copying and pasting code pretty muchAxG wrotebch4mp wrote Go with AppNet. Never had any issues with the it myself. I use it quite a bit, mostly for their spoofer, which is amazing, and everything works in the tool.
probably xxModdedWarexx little brother
lol no. I have almost no problems with the tool. Not saying it's the best tool in the world. No, but it's not the shit you make it out to be.
i just make 50$ already so....
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#44. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 30, 201211Year Member
Posts: 3,778
Reputation Power: 3016
Okay this is ridiculous. They are stealing other peoples work and claiming it as their own. A few minutes ago, I found this on another forum with the release date of Dec 11, 2014...
Guess what it does? If you guessed that it sets the class objecs such as your glasses, gloves, and other things then yes. That is what it is. Isn't it kind of odd that someone else released it and then magically they added it into AppNet? It's amamzing and I wonder how they did it becuase I know that the developer can't do shit on his own.
private void setCustomization(int classnum, uint offset0, uint item)
{
if (classnum < 0)
{
MessageBox.Show("Must select a class first!");
return;
}
uint Stats = 0x83A9E898; // tu5
uint[] offsets = new uint[5];
byte[] costumeID = new byte[];
offsets[0] = offset0;
for (uint i = 1; i < offsets.Length; i++)
offsets[i] = offsets[i - 1] + 0x24;
for (uint i = 0; i < 0x64; i++)
costumeID[i] = (byte)i;
if (classnum == 0)
{
foreach (uint offset in offsets)
{
Jtag.SetMemory(Stats + offset, new byte[] { (byte)item, 0x00 });
}
return;
}
switch (classnum)
{
case 1:
Jtag.SetMemory(Stats + offsets[0], new byte[] { (byte)item, 0x00 });
break;
case 2:
Jtag.SetMemory(Stats + offsets[1], new byte[] { (byte)item, 0x00 });
break;
case 3:
Jtag.SetMemory(Stats + offsets[2], new byte[] { (byte)item, 0x00 });
break;
case 4:
Jtag.SetMemory(Stats+ offsets[3], new byte[] { (byte)item, 0x00 });
break;
case 5:
Jtag.SetMemory(Stats + offsets[4], new byte[] { (byte)item, 0x00 });
break;
default: return;
}
}
Guess what it does? If you guessed that it sets the class objecs such as your glasses, gloves, and other things then yes. That is what it is. Isn't it kind of odd that someone else released it and then magically they added it into AppNet? It's amamzing and I wonder how they did it becuase I know that the developer can't do shit on his own.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#45. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 14, 201410Year Member
Posts: 1,370
Reputation Power: 115
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 14, 201410Year Member
Posts: 1,370
Reputation Power: 115
Liability wrote Okay this is ridiculous. They are stealing other peoples work and claiming it as their own. A few minutes ago, I found this on another forum with the release date of Dec 11, 2014...
private void setCustomization(int classnum, uint offset0, uint item)
{
if (classnum < 0)
{
MessageBox.Show("Must select a class first!");
return;
}
uint Stats = 0x83A9E898; // tu5
uint[] offsets = new uint[5];
byte[] costumeID = new byte[];
offsets[0] = offset0;
for (uint i = 1; i < offsets.Length; i++)
offsets[i] = offsets[i - 1] + 0x24;
for (uint i = 0; i < 0x64; i++)
costumeID[i] = (byte)i;
if (classnum == 0)
{
foreach (uint offset in offsets)
{
Jtag.SetMemory(Stats + offset, new byte[] { (byte)item, 0x00 });
}
return;
}
switch (classnum)
{
case 1:
Jtag.SetMemory(Stats + offsets[0], new byte[] { (byte)item, 0x00 });
break;
case 2:
Jtag.SetMemory(Stats + offsets[1], new byte[] { (byte)item, 0x00 });
break;
case 3:
Jtag.SetMemory(Stats + offsets[2], new byte[] { (byte)item, 0x00 });
break;
case 4:
Jtag.SetMemory(Stats+ offsets[3], new byte[] { (byte)item, 0x00 });
break;
case 5:
Jtag.SetMemory(Stats + offsets[4], new byte[] { (byte)item, 0x00 });
break;
default: return;
}
}
Guess what it does? If you guessed that it sets the class objecs such as your glasses, gloves, and other things then yes. That is what it is. Isn't it kind of odd that someone else released it and then magically they added it into AppNet? It's amamzing and I wonder how they did it becuase I know that the developer can't do shit on his own.
you are taking this personal why u say that ? lol
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#46. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 20, 201410Year Member
Posts: 31
Reputation Power: 1
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 20, 201410Year Member
Posts: 31
Reputation Power: 1
Personally wouldn't buy either. You can find free versions of these tools online just by searching for them. I think its a waste of money
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#47. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 14, 201410Year Member
Posts: 1,370
Reputation Power: 115
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 14, 201410Year Member
Posts: 1,370
Reputation Power: 115
Money_Lobby wrote Personally wouldn't buy either. You can find free versions of these tools online just by searching for them. I think its a waste of money
if u find a tool with unlock all for free now i pay you 30$ kid!!
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#48. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 20, 201410Year Member
Posts: 31
Reputation Power: 1
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 20, 201410Year Member
Posts: 31
Reputation Power: 1
xBoSS_Liive wroteMoney_Lobby wrote Personally wouldn't buy either. You can find free versions of these tools online just by searching for them. I think its a waste of money
if u find a tool with unlock all for free now i pay you 30$ kid!!
Your post is asking for opinions so don't get mad when I state mine. Google is a wonderful thing man
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#49. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 14, 201410Year Member
Posts: 1,370
Reputation Power: 115
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 14, 201410Year Member
Posts: 1,370
Reputation Power: 115
Money_Lobby wroteim not mad im just telling you!!xBoSS_Liive wroteMoney_Lobby wrote Personally wouldn't buy either. You can find free versions of these tools online just by searching for them. I think its a waste of money
if u find a tool with unlock all for free now i pay you 30$ kid!!
Your post is asking for opinions so don't get mad when I state mine. Google is a wonderful thing man
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#50. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 05, 201311Year Member
Posts: 2,216
Reputation Power: 98
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 05, 201311Year Member
Posts: 2,216
Reputation Power: 98
xBoSS_Liive wroteAxG wrotebch4mp wrote"the shit I make out to be" let's get this straight, you paid $35 for a tool that has free tools all kept together in one window. If you knew your way around Forums and could search for tools then you would agree with me. And also, what I said "isn't shit I made it out to be" it's what my experience was and there was a big post like this a while back and it was full of people saying the same things. The only reason your backing it up is because you aren't actually seeing what the developers are doing. Copying and pasting code pretty muchAxG wrotebch4mp wrote Go with AppNet. Never had any issues with the it myself. I use it quite a bit, mostly for their spoofer, which is amazing, and everything works in the tool.
probably xxModdedWarexx little brother
lol no. I have almost no problems with the tool. Not saying it's the best tool in the world. No, but it's not the shit you make it out to be.
i just make 50$ already so....
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
You don't make money going online. That statement is a flat out lie.
You'll realize one day buddy.
- 1useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.