You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
Cure For Cancer?
Posted:
Cure For Cancer?Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 21, 20159Year Member
Posts: 98
Reputation Power: 3
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 21, 20159Year Member
Posts: 98
Reputation Power: 3
So I've been kind of stuck on this for a while and most of my family has died of Cancer and I've had enough of it. As of every American should know, all of our presidents/important people haven't died of Cancer, Aids, e.t.c so I think that they've found a cure for cancer and aids, e.t.c but they won't release it to the public because of all the money they make with cigarettes. Any thoughts?
#2. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 26, 201212Year Member
Posts: 5,304
Reputation Power: 423
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 26, 201212Year Member
Posts: 5,304
Reputation Power: 423
I think there not going to give the cure out if they do have it cause they make a lot of money on some of the cancer treatments
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#3. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 14, 201014Year Member
Posts: 2,645
Reputation Power: 123
Status: Offline
Joined: May 14, 201014Year Member
Posts: 2,645
Reputation Power: 123
Wouldn't they make more money off of cigarettes if there was a cure to cancer?
- 8useful
- 0not useful
#4. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 24, 201212Year Member
Posts: 3,645
Reputation Power: 316
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 24, 201212Year Member
Posts: 3,645
Reputation Power: 316
Also if they release it the population will also boost up a bit. I mean in the UK it is packed everywhere, if they release a cure to cancer it will obviously get worse.
It is not a nice way to look at it but we do have to die eventually, if no one did then it would end up in mass population and lack of resources.
BUT i agree with you, i think they have found the cure but will never release to the public.
It is not a nice way to look at it but we do have to die eventually, if no one did then it would end up in mass population and lack of resources.
BUT i agree with you, i think they have found the cure but will never release to the public.
- 4useful
- 0not useful
#5. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 21, 20159Year Member
Posts: 98
Reputation Power: 3
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 21, 20159Year Member
Posts: 98
Reputation Power: 3
Well Cancer is a slut so I think people would stop smoking because of how bad it is, causing the US to lose money.
- 0useful
- 1not useful
#6. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 12, 201212Year Member
Posts: 4,169
Reputation Power: 170
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 12, 201212Year Member
Posts: 4,169
Reputation Power: 170
Boston-Bruins wrote Wouldn't they make more money off of cigarettes if there was a cure to cancer?
He does have a good solid point here. If there was a cure, then people would probably smoke cigarettes more often and more people would smoke them also. Then they would have to pay for the cancer treatment once they get it. Both end resulting in making lots of money from people.
- 2useful
- 0not useful
#7. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 14, 201014Year Member
Posts: 2,645
Reputation Power: 123
Status: Offline
Joined: May 14, 201014Year Member
Posts: 2,645
Reputation Power: 123
Harmski wrote Well Cancer is a slut so I think people would stop smoking because of how bad it is, causing the US to lose money.
So you're saying that people smoke now knowing that they could die from cancer, but people wouldn't smoke if they knew cancer could be cured? Hmmmmm...
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#8. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 21, 20159Year Member
Posts: 98
Reputation Power: 3
Boston-Bruins wroteI'm saying that smoking is wrong on so many levels and that maybe they wouldn't make the same mistake again after their cancer is "resolved"Harmski wrote Well Cancer is a slut so I think people would stop smoking because of how bad it is, causing the US to lose money.
So you're saying that people smoke now knowing that they could die from cancer, but people wouldn't smoke if they knew cancer could be cured? Hmmmmm...
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#9. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 06, 201113Year Member
Posts: 12,347
Reputation Power: 632
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 06, 201113Year Member
Posts: 12,347
Reputation Power: 632
Harmski wrote As of every American should know, all of our presidents/important people haven't died of Cancer, Aids, e.t.c so I think that they've found a cure for cancer and aids, e.t.c but they won't release it to the public because of all the money they make with cigarettes. Any thoughts?
FDR had Atherosclerosis, coronary artery disease, and congestive heart failure. He died in office.
Those are common, but brutal diseases that would likely be included in some "Cure for everything" package that you're talking about.
The reason that no President has ever had cancer or aids is because the likely hood of that is slim to none.
The chances of becoming the President is even less than 1 in 330 million.
If a cure for cancer was found, without a doubt there would be some scientist who would leak it if he bosses were trying to keep it to themselves.
Not all scientists are sociopaths.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#10. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 14, 201410Year Member
Posts: 1,128
Reputation Power: 54
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 14, 201410Year Member
Posts: 1,128
Reputation Power: 54
I hate to say it but cancer is a 124.6 billion doller industry, If there was a cure.. i doubt it would be released to anyone who isn't 'special'
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.