You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
Same Sex Marriage is Now Legal in all 50 States
Posted:

Same Sex Marriage is Now Legal in all 50 StatesPosted:

Nyan
  • Wizard
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 23, 201014Year Member
Posts: 2,685
Reputation Power: 187
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 23, 201014Year Member
Posts: 2,685
Reputation Power: 187
Woah, this happened like overnight! Congrats to the LGBT community.

The Supreme Court has found a constitutional right to same-sex marriage, striking down bans in 14 states and handing a historic victory to the gay rights movement that would have been unthinkable just 10 years ago.

Anthony Kennedy, a conservative justice who has broken with his ideological colleagues to author several decisions expanding rights for LGBT people, again sided with the courts four liberals to strike down the state bans. The 5-4 majority ruled that preventing same-sex people from marrying violated their constitutional right to equal protection under the law and that the states were unable to put forth a compelling reason to withhold that right from people.

The United States is now just the 21st country in the world to allow same-sex marriage in every jurisdiction.

In oral arguments last April, Kennedy expressed reservations about changing the traditional definition of marriage to include LGBT people and seemed to suggest that the court should allow the American public to continue debating the relatively new concept.

The word that keeps coming back to me in this case is millennia, he said then, referencing the amount of time societies had considered marriage to be only between a man and a woman.

But Kennedy was swayed by the fact that hundreds of thousands of married same-sex couples already exist and that they and their children are being treated differently by the law when they move to a state that doesnt recognize their union. The states in the case also had trouble articulating why they had a compelling reason to deny that recognition, saying only that it was in the interest of children to only allow couples of the opposite sex to marry.

The decision came just two years after the Supreme Court ruled that the federal government could no longer refuse to recognize married same-sex couples who lived in the handful of states that had legalized their unions. That decision, also written by Kennedy, caused a cascade of lower court decisions striking down state same-sex marriage bans, and now 36 states allow same-sex marriage. Public opinion on gay marriage has changed at lightning speed as well: 60 percent of Americans support it, compared with just 37 percent 10 years ago.

This transformative opinion will most likely continue the trend toward greater acceptance of LGBT people around the country, as the highest court of the land has ruled that same-sex unions are legitimate and lawful everywhere.

Even with the landmark decision, however, support for gay marriage has been almost nonexistent among elected Republican officials, whose positions on the issue likely will not change overnight. To date, no major Republican presidential candidate has endorsed marriage equality. Many 2016 GOP candidates even struggled with the question of whether or not they would attend a gay wedding.

Despite public opposition, many Republican operatives privately have suggested that court rulings favorable to gay marriage are a blessing in disguise for GOP politicians. With the judicial system expanding gay rights, the courts have eased the burden on the legislative and executive branches, removing pressure for them to act proactively on marriage equality policy.

The opinion is a big win for the Obama administration, which is already flying high after the Supreme Court batted down a potentially fatal challenge to the Affordable Care Act on Thursday. The president came out in favor of same-sex marriage in 2012.

Fridays ruling also could have a big effect on religious institutions that have maintained their opposition to same-sex marriage. Religious schools that refuse to provide housing for same-sex couples could face lawsuits and lose their tax-exempt status, for example. (Religious clergy will not have to marry same-sex couples, however.) Some states will most likely respond to this ruling by attempting to pass legislation to exempt people who oppose same-sex marriage on religious grounds, such as the controversial Indiana law that passed in March.

The gay rights movement, meanwhile, will move on to employment discrimination. Activists want a federal law that forbids discriminating against people based on their sexual orientation.

Gay and lesbian couples will be able to marry immediately in the four states named in the case Kentucky, Ohio, Tennessee and Michigan. There may be a delay of a few days or weeks for same-sex marriage to be legal in the remaining states with bans, since lower courts will have to apply the opinion to them.


Source: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

The following 19 users thanked Nyan for this useful post:

Red (08-05-2015), Establish (06-27-2015), Skittle (06-27-2015), I_Do_MoneyGlitches (06-26-2015), xPhotograph (06-26-2015), pi (06-26-2015), Submissive (06-26-2015), Andy (06-26-2015), Banq (06-26-2015), JonnyUK (06-26-2015), Tiffxny (06-26-2015), imaqtpie (06-26-2015), ProfessorNobody (06-26-2015), Vera (06-26-2015), jush (06-26-2015), nostril (06-26-2015), Yin (06-26-2015), Dusknoir (06-26-2015), Miss (06-26-2015)
#2. Posted:
Hijac
  • Ladder Climber
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 13, 201212Year Member
Posts: 365
Reputation Power: 16
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 13, 201212Year Member
Posts: 365
Reputation Power: 16
Nyan wrote
Woah, this happened like overnight! Congrats to the LGBT community.

The Supreme Court has found a constitutional right to same-sex marriage, striking down bans in 14 states and handing a historic victory to the gay rights movement that would have been unthinkable just 10 years ago.

Anthony Kennedy, a conservative justice who has broken with his ideological colleagues to author several decisions expanding rights for LGBT people, again sided with the courts four liberals to strike down the state bans. The 5-4 majority ruled that preventing same-sex people from marrying violated their constitutional right to equal protection under the law and that the states were unable to put forth a compelling reason to withhold that right from people.

The United States is now just the 21st country in the world to allow same-sex marriage in every jurisdiction.

In oral arguments last April, Kennedy expressed reservations about changing the traditional definition of marriage to include LGBT people and seemed to suggest that the court should allow the American public to continue debating the relatively new concept.

The word that keeps coming back to me in this case is millennia, he said then, referencing the amount of time societies had considered marriage to be only between a man and a woman.

But Kennedy was swayed by the fact that hundreds of thousands of married same-sex couples already exist and that they and their children are being treated differently by the law when they move to a state that doesnt recognize their union. The states in the case also had trouble articulating why they had a compelling reason to deny that recognition, saying only that it was in the interest of children to only allow couples of the opposite sex to marry.

The decision came just two years after the Supreme Court ruled that the federal government could no longer refuse to recognize married same-sex couples who lived in the handful of states that had legalized their unions. That decision, also written by Kennedy, caused a cascade of lower court decisions striking down state same-sex marriage bans, and now 36 states allow same-sex marriage. Public opinion on gay marriage has changed at lightning speed as well: 60 percent of Americans support it, compared with just 37 percent 10 years ago.

This transformative opinion will most likely continue the trend toward greater acceptance of LGBT people around the country, as the highest court of the land has ruled that same-sex unions are legitimate and lawful everywhere.

Even with the landmark decision, however, support for gay marriage has been almost nonexistent among elected Republican officials, whose positions on the issue likely will not change overnight. To date, no major Republican presidential candidate has endorsed marriage equality. Many 2016 GOP candidates even struggled with the question of whether or not they would attend a gay wedding.

Despite public opposition, many Republican operatives privately have suggested that court rulings favorable to gay marriage are a blessing in disguise for GOP politicians. With the judicial system expanding gay rights, the courts have eased the burden on the legislative and executive branches, removing pressure for them to act proactively on marriage equality policy.

The opinion is a big win for the Obama administration, which is already flying high after the Supreme Court batted down a potentially fatal challenge to the Affordable Care Act on Thursday. The president came out in favor of same-sex marriage in 2012.

Fridays ruling also could have a big effect on religious institutions that have maintained their opposition to same-sex marriage. Religious schools that refuse to provide housing for same-sex couples could face lawsuits and lose their tax-exempt status, for example. (Religious clergy will not have to marry same-sex couples, however.) Some states will most likely respond to this ruling by attempting to pass legislation to exempt people who oppose same-sex marriage on religious grounds, such as the controversial Indiana law that passed in March.

The gay rights movement, meanwhile, will move on to employment discrimination. Activists want a federal law that forbids discriminating against people based on their sexual orientation.

Gay and lesbian couples will be able to marry immediately in the four states named in the case Kentucky, Ohio, Tennessee and Michigan. There may be a delay of a few days or weeks for same-sex marriage to be legal in the remaining states with bans, since lower courts will have to apply the opinion to them.


Source: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
I am happy for the LGBT people congrats to them!
#3. Posted:
-Kendrick
  • TTG Senior
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 30, 201013Year Member
Posts: 1,029
Reputation Power: 58
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 30, 201013Year Member
Posts: 1,029
Reputation Power: 58
Although I find homosexuals a little irritating and snobby. However, the constitution should not regulate human emotion, such as love. If you love someone, you should be able to marry them whether you are both men, both women, or one of each.
So I also am happy for them.
#4. Posted:
Ever
  • 1000 Thanks
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 10, 201311Year Member
Posts: 6,134
Reputation Power: 546
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 10, 201311Year Member
Posts: 6,134
Reputation Power: 546
I've always had a neutral view on this. I didn't care if they could or couldn't have legal same sex marriage.
#5. Posted:
Ari_
  • Wise One
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 17, 201410Year Member
Posts: 589
Reputation Power: 25
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 17, 201410Year Member
Posts: 589
Reputation Power: 25
This is a great day for the United States
#6. Posted:
Deftones
  • Winner!
Status: Offline
Joined: May 16, 201311Year Member
Posts: 8,525
Reputation Power: 1554
Status: Offline
Joined: May 16, 201311Year Member
Posts: 8,525
Reputation Power: 1554
Nice to know, pathetic that they weren't allowed in the first place.
#7. Posted:
Yin
  • Christmas!
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 30, 201212Year Member
Posts: 5,468
Reputation Power: 245
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 30, 201212Year Member
Posts: 5,468
Reputation Power: 245
Not only is this just amazing and great news in general, now people can get to work on other important issues. Totally a win-win from where I am standing (or sitting.)
#8. Posted:
Donald_Trump
  • TTG Addict
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 02, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,895
Reputation Power: 824
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 02, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,895
Reputation Power: 824
Sad day for America.

Should have been left up to each individual state to decide wether it should be legal or not. Amendment 10 of the US consitution.
#9. Posted:
Forest
  • Summer 2020
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 13, 200915Year Member
Posts: 7,815
Reputation Power: 3052
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 13, 200915Year Member
Posts: 7,815
Reputation Power: 3052
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Really interesting gif showing the progress over the years.
#10. Posted:
Seer
  • Summer 2021
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 07, 201311Year Member
Posts: 574
Reputation Power: 42
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 07, 201311Year Member
Posts: 574
Reputation Power: 42
Equality is good, I could care either which way. I just get so "Boggled" as to why (-Say person is openly comitted) get married under god when somewhere in the depths of the bible, same sex is frowned upon or so its been emphasized. No flame intended just a genuine question?


Last edited by Seer ; edited 1 time in total
Jump to:
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.